16.05.2014 Views

Australia's Gambling Industries - Productivity Commission

Australia's Gambling Industries - Productivity Commission

Australia's Gambling Industries - Productivity Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• post-weighting the sample data for phase 1 (screener questionnaire) and phase 2<br />

(full interview) respondents.<br />

Quotas<br />

The strict quotas for completed screener interviews based on area are those set out<br />

in table F.2. Approximate rather than strict age and gender quotas were used to<br />

ensure sufficient representation of each age/gender group, as a compromise solution<br />

to survey accuracy and cost. This involved setting minimum and maximum bounds<br />

(of ±33 per cent) around the strict quotas, and monitoring the degree to which the<br />

quotas were being met as the survey proceeded. Such an approach means that<br />

modest differences between each age/gender/area cell size in comparison with those<br />

that would apply with strict quotas are acceptable, bringing about a major reduction<br />

in the cost of the survey but only a small reduction in accuracy. The deviations from<br />

ABS age/gender/area population data are then corrected by applying weights to the<br />

sample data.<br />

In relation to the ‘loose’ quotas, it became apparent towards the end of the fieldwork<br />

phase that some of the minimum age/gender quotas would not be met in some of the<br />

smaller States. Hence, in place of the last birthday method — which was used to<br />

complete 10 365 interviews — the approach taken was to ask to speak to the<br />

youngest male aged 18 or older (and then the youngest female) before substituting<br />

for another adult within the household. This enabled all minimum quotas to be met,<br />

but the number of screener interviews needed to be completed slightly exceeded the<br />

original 10 500 — 10 609 participants completed the screener.<br />

Weighting schemes for population estimates<br />

Information for the sample respondents was multiplied by weighting factors to<br />

provide estimates for the whole population. Because of the selective (random)<br />

interview strategy used in phase 2 of the questionnaire, separate weights are<br />

appropriate for the screener respondents and the full interview respondents.<br />

Phase 1 weights — Screener respondents<br />

As noted in section F.5, the sample was stratified across 120 area/age/gender cells.<br />

The weight for each screener respondent in a given cell was calculated as:<br />

WTSCR = (HHSize) * [cell population / ΣHHSize].<br />

NATIONAL GAMBLING<br />

SURVEY<br />

F.21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!