16.05.2014 Views

Australia's Gambling Industries - Productivity Commission

Australia's Gambling Industries - Productivity Commission

Australia's Gambling Industries - Productivity Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for an explanation of how the alternative level of spending was derived).<br />

Recreational gamblers are estimated to spend only $645 each in a year.<br />

This results in an estimated annual expenditure by all problem gamblers of $438<br />

million, less than 15 per cent of their current spending of $3.6 billion.<br />

The demand condition for problem and recreational gamblers is illustrated in figure<br />

C.3. Two demand schedules are drawn for problem gamblers. The first is their<br />

observed demand (D p ), representing current consumption and the assumption that<br />

their demand is less sensitive to price changes than that of recreational gamblers.<br />

Their demand schedule in the absence of their compulsion is depicted as Dpa,<br />

representing the assumption that problem gamblers would consume considerably<br />

less in the absence of their compulsion.<br />

For problem gamblers in the absence of the compulsion, there is an element of<br />

consumer surplus indicated by area b, where the value they receive is more than the<br />

price. As the quantity of gambling they would undertake in the absence of the<br />

compulsion is small (typically problem gamblers spend almost 20 times the amount<br />

per annum as recreational gamblers and 5 times the amount per annum than regular<br />

recreational gamblers), this surplus is likely to be small.<br />

Importantly, spending in excess of the ‘recreational’ level is not all ‘lost’ to the<br />

problem gambler. It does have some value, even if this value is less than the amount<br />

of money paid. The value is represented by the area under the demand schedule in<br />

excess of the ‘recreational’ level of consumption. The loss that they face is<br />

represented by the area d. This area can be seen as representing ‘negative’ consumer<br />

surplus in that the real benefit (represented by D pa in the absence of the compulsion)<br />

is less than the price they are paying. This may exceed the amount of ‘true’<br />

consumer surplus (area b) that they derive from the activity.<br />

For recreational gamblers, their consumer surplus is indicated by the area c.<br />

ESTIMATING<br />

CONSUMER SURPLUS<br />

C.11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!