RIVM report xxxxxx xxx
RIVM report xxxxxx xxx
RIVM report xxxxxx xxx
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>RIVM</strong> <strong>report</strong> 773301 001 / NRP <strong>report</strong> 410200 051 page 63 of 142<br />
7DEOH+LVWRULFDOWUHQGLQUHJLRQDOVDYDQQDKEXUQLQJLQGH[ <br />
Region 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995<br />
Latin America 1.11 1.08 1.06 1.03 1.00 0.98<br />
Africa 1.02 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93<br />
South Asia 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.94<br />
East Asia 3.69 2.82 2.04 1.58 1.00 0.50<br />
Southeast Asia 1.12 1.07 1.06 1.03 1.00 0.97<br />
Oceania 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00<br />
World 1.07 1.05 1.03 1.02 1.00 0.94<br />
Source: simulation of IMAGE 2.1 (Baseline A), except underlined values for 1995, where IMAGE values were<br />
considered unrealistically low (own estimate).<br />
Source of activity data: FAO (1993).<br />
For DJULFXOWXUDO ZDVWH EXUQLQJ (on-site), the fractions burned on-site have been changed<br />
substantially, based on analysis made for the GEIA ammonia inventory for non-OECD'90 countries<br />
(Bouwman, 1997) and data <strong>report</strong>ed in National Communications of OECD countries (i.e. of USA,<br />
Japan, Australia). For both developed and developing countries the fractions burned are now<br />
estimated considerably lower than in EDGAR 2.0. We assume 5% in OECD regions, 20% in EIT<br />
(Eastern Europe and former USSR) and 40% in developing regions, except for Oceania where we<br />
used a percentage of 30% (Nat. Com. Australia) and for OECD Europe where we assumed a<br />
decreasing trend from 40% in 1980, 20% in 1990 to 5% in 1995 based on data for the UK in Lee and<br />
Adkins (1994). Also the fractions of agricultural waste associated with the net crop production have<br />
been modified (Smill, 1999). The resulting trend in amounts burned on site is presented in Fig 4.2.<br />
The 40% for less developed countries includes the amounts used as biofuel; for OECD and EIT the<br />
fractions are assumed to refer to field burning only. The resulting fractions of agricultural waste<br />
assumed to be burned on the field is presented in Table 4.3, where these are presented per<br />
EDGAR3/IMAGE2 region for the period 1970-1995. Due to varying % of amounts used as biofuel in<br />
LDC regions, the effective fraction of field burning also varies in these regions. For OECD regions<br />
the fractions are assumed to refer to field burning only, and are assumed to remain constant, except<br />
for OECD Europe as discussed above.<br />
7DEOH5HJLRQDOIUDFWLRQVRIDJULFXOWXUHZDVWHEXUQLQJRQVLWHLQ('*$5H[FOXGLQJSHU/'&FRXQWU\WKH<br />
DPRXQWXVHGDVELRIXHOXQLWILHOGEXUQLQJRIWRWDODJULFXOWXUDOUHVLGXHV<br />
EDGAR 3 IM 2 1970 1975 1980 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995<br />
01: Canada 1 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%<br />
02: USA 2 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%<br />
03: OECD Europe 9 40% 40% 40% 30% 28% 26% 24% 22% 20% 15% 10% 8% 7% 5%<br />
04: Japan 17 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%<br />
05: Oceania 16 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30%<br />
06: Eastern Europe 10 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%<br />
07: Former USSR 11 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%<br />
08: Latin America 3 17% 17% 19% 21% 19% 20% 19% 19% 21% 21% 21% 20% 21% 21%<br />
08: Latin America 4 22% 21% 18% 16% 16% 15% 16% 16% 15% 16% 16% 18% 17% 17%<br />
09: Africa 5 25% 20% 22% 21% 23% 17% 24% 24% 19% 20% 14% 14% 22% 13%<br />
09: Africa 6 23% 24% 24% 23% 22% 22% 22% 23% 22% 23% 23% 23% 23% 23%<br />
09: Africa 7 24% 24% 20% 21% 20% 21% 20% 21% 22% 21% 20% 27% 26% 27%<br />
09: Africa 8 21% 21% 24% 22% 22% 21% 22% 24% 22% 21% 23% 26% 24% 22%<br />
10: Middle East 12 31% 31% 32% 31% 31% 31% 32% 31% 31% 31% 30% 30% 31% 31%<br />
11: South Asia 13 0% 0% 2% 3% 3% 1% 3% 4% 3% 2% 3% 4% 5% 4%<br />
12: East Asia 14 5% 7% 5% 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%<br />
13: Southeast Asia 15 23% 22% 23% 22% 23% 23% 23% 22% 22% 21% 21% 20% 21% 21%<br />
Note: IM 2 = IMAGE 2 region (see Appendix A.4.4).