16.05.2014 Views

RIVM report xxxxxx xxx

RIVM report xxxxxx xxx

RIVM report xxxxxx xxx

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

page 42 of 142 <strong>RIVM</strong> <strong>report</strong> 773301 001 / NRP <strong>report</strong> 410200 051<br />

Global emissions of the direct greenhouse gases CO 2 ,CH 4 and N 2 O have increased by 16% since<br />

1970. The economic decline in the former USSR and Eastern European countries brought the total<br />

global CO 2 emissions to an almost constant level in the 1990-1995 period; however, in 1996 they<br />

increased by 3%. The 4% decrease in CO 2 emissions from the former USSR in 1996 seems to be the<br />

lowest level in the decline. In 1995 and 1996 the emissions in the Eastern European countries were<br />

already increasing again by a few per cent annually. In the rest of the world, CO 2 emissions increased<br />

by 15% compared to 1990, in particular, in developing countries (+30%).<br />

In the European Union, USA, Canada and Japan, CO 2 emissions increased in 1996 by 2, 3, 1 and<br />

2%, respectively. Total growth in these countries since 1990 has been 1, 6, 9 and 13%, respectively.<br />

While fossil fuel consumption increased by 4%, the minor increase in the EU in the last six years was<br />

mainly due to a shift in the fossil-fuel mix from coal to gas. The share of coal decreased from 27% to<br />

20%, while that of gas increased from 20% to 26%. Similar large shifts did not occur in other OECD<br />

countries.<br />

Global emissions of direct greenhouse gases decreased by 7% since 1990 mainly due to the sharp<br />

decrease in CFC emissions since 1988. HFC emissions are, however, increasing fast and may start to<br />

contribute significantly to total trends from 2000 onwards, in particular, in OECD countries. In 1995,<br />

for example, the consumption of HFC-134a increased by 45%. At present, no control policies exist<br />

for HFCs at the international level.<br />

&RXSOLQJWRHFRQRPLFWUHQGV<br />

In the 1990-1995 period, global GDP increased by about 9%, while global CO 2 emissions from fossilfuel<br />

use increased by 2%. This partial ‘decoupling’ was caused by a shift of the fossil-fuel mix to<br />

more gas and (a bit) less coal, in particular in OECD countries (e.g. in the EU and the USA, but not in<br />

Japan), as well as a general trend towards a less energy-intensive economy. In the EU the share of<br />

coal decreased from 27% to 21%. Between 1990 and 1995, the GDP of the EU-15 increased by 6%,<br />

fossil fuel use increased by 1%, while CO2 emissions decreased by 2%, mainly due to a decrease in<br />

coal consumption in Germany, the United Kingdom and Italy. In the USA and Australia, the increase<br />

in CO2 emissions was about half of the increase in GDP.<br />

Other parts of the world with a relatively low GDP growth, such as Japan, Canada, Middle East<br />

(or even a drop in GDP, as in the former Soviet Union, Eastern Europe and Africa), do not show a<br />

partial ‘decoupling’ but rather the opposite. This also applies to Latin America. In Eastern Europe the<br />

CO2 trend is -12% vs. a GDP trend of -6%; in the former USSR, CO 2 emissions dropped less (-35%)<br />

than GDP (-40%).<br />

In China CO 2 emissions increased by about 23%, while GDP increased almost 70%. In other Asian<br />

countries, including the so-called ‘economic tigers’, the increase in CO 2 emissions is similar to the<br />

development of GDP. It should be noted, though, that due to the quality and limited comparability of<br />

available statistics, trends analyses particularly for GDP, but also for CO 2 , are less reliable for<br />

countries like the former USSR and China than for most others.<br />

(PLVVLRQLQWHQVLW\<br />

Per capita emissions of CO 2 for countries within the European Union are 2 to 3 times as high as the<br />

global average. In 1990 the EU average was about 20% lower than for the Netherlands, whereas the<br />

OECD average was about 6% higher. Per capita emissions are the highest in the USA. In 1990 per<br />

capita emissions in the former USSR were comparable with the OECD average and stood at 35%<br />

above the EU average (Fig. 2.3).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!