15.05.2014 Views

Nepal Clean Home Delivery Kit: Evaluation of the Health Impact - Path

Nepal Clean Home Delivery Kit: Evaluation of the Health Impact - Path

Nepal Clean Home Delivery Kit: Evaluation of the Health Impact - Path

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

egardless <strong>of</strong> what <strong>the</strong> absolute rate is in <strong>the</strong> specific setting is. The relative risk is more<br />

useful for general analysis, since <strong>the</strong> underlying rates may be affected by many o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

factors and vary widely from one setting to ano<strong>the</strong>r. All factors which had a significant<br />

relationship with both kit use and cord infection were initially included in <strong>the</strong> logistic<br />

regression models. Only those factors which had significant independent risks in <strong>the</strong><br />

model (i.e., whose 95% confidence intervals did not include 1.0) were retained in <strong>the</strong><br />

final model. For example, DISTRICT was no longer significant when INTERVIEWER was<br />

included in <strong>the</strong> model and was, <strong>the</strong>refore, dropped from <strong>the</strong> model. Similarly, a variable<br />

that grouped birth attendants into four categories (trained TBA, untrained TBA, family or<br />

neighbor, health worker) was initially included in <strong>the</strong> model. There were no real<br />

differences among <strong>the</strong> first three groups (once o<strong>the</strong>r more specific variables were<br />

accounted for), and <strong>the</strong> elevated infection risk associated with health workers (RR=1.6,<br />

95% C.I. <strong>of</strong> 0.78-3.4) was not statistically significant. The relative risks, as adjusted for<br />

<strong>the</strong> confounding factors <strong>of</strong> week <strong>of</strong> interview, month, and interviewer, are shown in Table<br />

11.<br />

Table 11. <strong>Kit</strong> use and o<strong>the</strong>r risk factors for cord infection<br />

Risk Factor Relative Risk 1 95% Confidence Interval<br />

<strong>Kit</strong> vs. new blade, coin/nothing 1.3 (0.81, 1.9)<br />

<strong>Kit</strong> vs. new blade, o<strong>the</strong>r surface 0.74 (0.22, 2.5)<br />

<strong>Kit</strong> vs. boiled blade, coin/nothing 0.96 (0.63, 1.5)<br />

<strong>Kit</strong> vs. boiled blade, o<strong>the</strong>r surface; o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

2<br />

blade, any surface<br />

0.45 (0.25, 0.81)<br />

Put on cord just after (vs. nothing):<br />

Mustard oil 0.31 (0.07, 1.3)<br />

Ash 1.4 (0.90, 2.2)<br />

Herbals 0.78 (0.22, 2.8)<br />

Dettol 0.67 (0.35, 1.3)<br />

Antibiotic 0.93 (0.25, 3.4)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 3.8 (0.96, 15.1)<br />

Don’t know 0.56 (0.24, 1.3)<br />

<strong>Clean</strong> or no cloth vs. Dirty one 2 0.60 (0.43, 0.82)<br />

Hands washed with soap before cutting<br />

2<br />

cord vs. not washed<br />

0.58 (0.40, 0.84)<br />

Hands washed with water before cutting<br />

cord vs. not washed<br />

0.78 (0.44, 1.4)<br />

1<br />

Adjusted for interview week, month, and interviewer.<br />

2<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!