Zoological Parks Authority - Parliament of Western Australia - The ...
Zoological Parks Authority - Parliament of Western Australia - The ... Zoological Parks Authority - Parliament of Western Australia - The ...
Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL REPORT 2012 Agency Performance – Report on Operations Outcomes, Services and Performance Information Actual Results versus Budget Targets The following information details results against the targets contained in the Authority’s annual Resource Agreement with the Minister and the Treasurer. The Resource Agreement contains financial and non-financial performance targets. Explanations of material variations between actual results and targets are also provided. Financial Targets Total cost of services (expense limit) (details from Income Statement) Net cost of services (details from Income Statement) Total equity (details from Statement of Financial Position) Net increase/(decrease) in cash held (details from Statement of Cash Flows) Target $000’s Actual $000’s Variation $000’s 21,832 21,942 110 9,053 8,494 (559) 50,814 48,679 (2,135) 34 476 442 Approved full time equivalent (FTE) staff level 166 166 – Explanation of significant variations against financial targets Total cost of services Costs were in line with original targets and were well managed during 2011‐12. Net cost of services The decrease in the net cost of services was due to higher than expected revenue during 2011‐12. This included a 9.5% increase in revenue from admissions due to the record attendance levels of 640,642 and a 10.1% increase in retail shop sales. Revenue for the year also included insurance claims proceeds of over $277,000 relating to the March 2010 hail storm and the reversal of a previously recorded asset impairment loss of $200,000 for the Australian wetlands exhibit. 30
Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL REPORT 2012 Agency Performance – Report on Operations Outcomes, Services and Performance Information Actual Results versus Budget Targets continued Total Equity The lower than targeted equity figure was due to building asset revaluations being significantly lower than originally expected. Net increase/(decrease) in cash held Cash increases in excess of the target were due to the higher than expected revenue during 2011‐12. The record attendance levels and increases in some areas of commercial revenue contributed to the overall increase in revenue. 31
- Page 1 and 2: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 3 and 4: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 5 and 6: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 7 and 8: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 9 and 10: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 11 and 12: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 13 and 14: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 15 and 16: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 17 and 18: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 19 and 20: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 21 and 22: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 23 and 24: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 25 and 26: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 27 and 28: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 29: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 33 and 34: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 35 and 36: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 37 and 38: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 39 and 40: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 41 and 42: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 43 and 44: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 45 and 46: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 47 and 48: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 49 and 50: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 51 and 52: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 53 and 54: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 55 and 56: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 57 and 58: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 59 and 60: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 61 and 62: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 63 and 64: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 65 and 66: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 67 and 68: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 69 and 70: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 71 and 72: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 73 and 74: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 75 and 76: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 77 and 78: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
- Page 79 and 80: Zoological Parks Authority ANNUAL R
<strong>Zoological</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> ANNUAL REPORT 2012<br />
Agency Performance – Report on Operations<br />
Outcomes, Services and Performance Information<br />
Actual Results versus Budget Targets<br />
<strong>The</strong> following information details results against<br />
the targets contained in the <strong>Authority</strong>’s annual<br />
Resource Agreement with the Minister and the<br />
Treasurer. <strong>The</strong> Resource Agreement contains<br />
financial and non-financial performance targets.<br />
Explanations <strong>of</strong> material variations between<br />
actual results and targets are also provided.<br />
Financial Targets<br />
Total cost <strong>of</strong> services (expense limit)<br />
(details from Income Statement)<br />
Net cost <strong>of</strong> services<br />
(details from Income Statement)<br />
Total equity<br />
(details from Statement <strong>of</strong> Financial Position)<br />
Net increase/(decrease) in cash held<br />
(details from Statement <strong>of</strong> Cash Flows)<br />
Target<br />
$000’s<br />
Actual<br />
$000’s<br />
Variation<br />
$000’s<br />
21,832 21,942 110<br />
9,053 8,494 (559)<br />
50,814 48,679 (2,135)<br />
34 476 442<br />
Approved full time equivalent (FTE) staff level 166 166 –<br />
Explanation <strong>of</strong> significant variations against financial targets<br />
Total cost <strong>of</strong> services<br />
Costs were in line with original targets and were well managed during 2011‐12.<br />
Net cost <strong>of</strong> services<br />
<strong>The</strong> decrease in the net cost <strong>of</strong> services was due to higher than expected revenue during 2011‐12.<br />
This included a 9.5% increase in revenue from admissions due to the record attendance levels <strong>of</strong><br />
640,642 and a 10.1% increase in retail shop sales. Revenue for the year also included insurance<br />
claims proceeds <strong>of</strong> over $277,000 relating to the March 2010 hail storm and the reversal <strong>of</strong> a<br />
previously recorded asset impairment loss <strong>of</strong> $200,000 for the <strong>Australia</strong>n wetlands exhibit.<br />
30