1904 - 1913 - Parliament of New South Wales
1904 - 1913 - Parliament of New South Wales
1904 - 1913 - Parliament of New South Wales
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IMERIKNIDES T6 TIIE VOTES AND rROCFEDINGS, 6L ."1~22-.,D rARLIAAIFNT- SESSION 19 13- VoU 'VOLUMES.<br />
P<br />
FOINTS OF ORDER :-<br />
OF SPEAKER :-<br />
Thatillotiontoatriend the CrownLandsConsolidation Act, <strong>1913</strong>,-an Act which was not yet in'<br />
indicated the Bill proposed to be brought in, and wag in order, 41 .<br />
That debate oil motior for adjournment to discuss the action .<strong>of</strong> the.Mh ister for Lands in not<br />
uiaking z4vailable" sufficient ;area, <strong>of</strong>',Crown lands foe Additional'1401(IiDgS, Would 1101<br />
anticipate . debate oil Notice. <strong>of</strong> Motion for leave to bring ina .Bill to amend the iaw relating<br />
to agricultural holdings, 46 .<br />
That de0ato on motion for adjournment to discuss the necessity for the Premier to give this<br />
House forthwith the opportu ity~ to deal with Motion No . 6, standing in his name, anticipates<br />
discussion on a motion alreadY oil tbeBusinoss Paper, 50 .<br />
That tile motion to amend the Crown - Lands Consolidation Act, <strong>1913</strong>,-an Act which was not<br />
ypt in existence-thoroughly described the Bill to be brought in, and was in order, 51 .<br />
That . motion for the establishn~cnt <strong>of</strong> a State Lottery being referred to tile electors by way<br />
. <strong>of</strong> referendum, did not come within the operation <strong>of</strong> Standing Order No . 133, and did not,<br />
originate any appropriation <strong>of</strong> public money, 54 .<br />
That amendment to motion <strong>of</strong> consure, condenining tile Government for entering into agreenient<br />
witly Griffiths & Co ., Limited, for the financing and construction <strong>of</strong> certain public<br />
worksi went too far, and could not be accepted, 64.<br />
That debate oil motion <strong>of</strong> adjournniant to discuss, the necessity for immediate steps being<br />
taken by the Government to stamp out the epidemic <strong>of</strong> smallpox would not anticipate<br />
discussion on motion for 2nd September, for the appointment <strong>of</strong> a Select ConnPittee, 73 .<br />
That the Closer Settlement (Amendment) Pill was in o rder ; although it proposed that pureliase~<br />
or resumptions <strong>of</strong>, land should be paid for by cash, Inscribed Stoetc, or Treasury bills, 74 .<br />
That the name <strong>of</strong> the'llonorable Member for Darlinghtirst', hav'inIg been strUel- out in con-inection<br />
with tile election <strong>of</strong> the representative <strong>of</strong> the Legislative Assembly on. the Senate <strong>of</strong> tile<br />
Oniversity <strong>of</strong> Sydney, it was competent to move, as an amendment, that the Honorable<br />
'Member be again nominated for . the position, 81 .,<br />
That motion for adjournment to discuss the recent taking away <strong>of</strong> the power to give certificates<br />
<strong>of</strong> successful Vaccination froin the local authorities at <strong>New</strong>ca'stic was essentially different .<br />
from the motion moved to disconis the necessity for immediate steps being taken by tile<br />
Government to stamp out the epidemic <strong>of</strong> -.i-nallpox, 84.<br />
That motion for adjournment to discuss the recent taking away <strong>of</strong> the power to give certificates<br />
<strong>of</strong> successful vaccination from the local authorities at <strong>New</strong>castle,was practically aip~otest<br />
ag, inst certain action which hall deprived the local authorities <strong>of</strong> power to issue cert ficates,<br />
aud-could be redressed by this House, 84.<br />
That it was competent for this House to discuss the 'recent taking away <strong>of</strong> the power to give<br />
certificates <strong>of</strong> successful Vaccination from the local authoritiesat <strong>New</strong>castle, although tile<br />
question <strong>of</strong> quarantine was amongst tile powers handed over to the Federal Governri cut, 81 .<br />
That the Crown Lands Consolidation Bill w*as ithin the Order <strong>of</strong> Leave 3'nol in co'nfo.%r-nian--c-e<br />
with the Title, and any objection should w have been taken before the second reading<br />
stage, 85-6 .<br />
That Nurses Registration Bill, which originated in the Legislative Council, ald notinvolve<br />
expenditure <strong>of</strong> publie money and was in order, 97.<br />
That motion for adjournment dealing with imprisonment <strong>of</strong> scanlen for . refusing to be<br />
vaccinated had not been discussed oil previous motions, 100 .<br />
That motion for adjournment dealing with imprisonmer<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> seamen for refusing to be<br />
vaccinated did not: anticipate discussion on Vaccination Bill, notice <strong>of</strong> which had .licen<br />
given, 100.<br />
That tile action <strong>of</strong> the leader <strong>of</strong> the Opposition in agreeing to waive <strong>Parliament</strong>ary Privilele<br />
i~! respect to anticipated legal proceedings by the Al inister for Works for statements ma(le<br />
in this House had not suddenly arisen and could not be considered as a matter <strong>of</strong> privilege<br />
.-rule*(I'against 6~ Mr. Speaker, 111 .<br />
Thatthe' action <strong>of</strong> the leader 61 the Opposition in tigree;n~ to -waive <strong>Parliament</strong>ary Privileg<br />
-respect to ancicip_~ted legal proceedings by the Alinister for Works for statements made. ȯ in<br />
in<br />
o this 146~iiWe would constitute a ])reach <strong>of</strong> privilege -and could be discussed by. the House, I 11 .<br />
That the House having negative(I We proposal to fill the blank for the reconsideratio n, <strong>of</strong> a<br />
certain clause on recommital, it was competent to move to fecommit for the reconsideration<br />
'<br />
-<strong>of</strong> another clause, 132 .<br />
ThliA it was-r~6t neces'iary to fix thc-tbird'rcadin~ <strong>of</strong> a Bill for a future" day at tile clo So -0<br />
f the<br />
Ses.'sio 132 .<br />
That motion approving <strong>of</strong> agreement between the Minister for Public Works and Griffit]<br />
Co . Contractors, Australia (Ltd .), was an abstract motion, and did not involve expenditure<br />
<strong>of</strong> ~nblic money, 136.<br />
That amendment to motiou approving <strong>of</strong> agreellient lietwep-n the ~Nlini%tcr lor Public Works and<br />
GIriffiths & Co ., Contractors, Australia (Ltd.), whichlomitted tile words " be approved " an(]<br />
inserted the words "be submitted in the form <strong>of</strong>-a Bill " was not a direct negative <strong>of</strong><br />
motion under consideration, 136 .<br />
That lie could not accept the Public Worlzs Act as governing the proceedings or limiting the<br />
powers <strong>of</strong> this House, 137.<br />
That the proposal to construct the City Railway was covered by the Ilessage about to be read .<br />
137 .<br />
That Message from the Governor could intercept any business, 137.<br />
RIJI,IX(,:S OF I)ErUTY-SI'EAKER :-<br />
That motion for adjournment to discuss the neglect <strong>of</strong> the Gove).-nniont to extend sewerage to<br />
the crowded suburbs <strong>of</strong> the oitv was <strong>of</strong> a sufficiently definit-- ellaxacter, 36 .<br />
That d* crepancy in resolution indicatin, that Earl y Olosing and. Saturo.ay, Half-Holiday Bill<br />
i astead IS <strong>of</strong> Early Closing Bill, bad been forwarded to tL6 Legislative Council during -,9<br />
previous Session, I~as technical and"could be remedied by amendment, 111 .<br />
Thatamendment to omit words from resolution requ~nting Leg~slative Coir. :icil to proceed with<br />
Early Closing Bill was in order, 9 .1 .<br />
That every resolution <strong>of</strong> the Legislati ve Assembly declaring that it is expe(li*ent or not expedient<br />
to carry out any proposed work as recommended by the .1arliamentary Standing Committee<br />
on Pdbli'6 Works' shovId be notified in. the Oazrtle before . th .e Bill is,dntroduced,-ruled<br />
against by Mr . Deputy-Speaker, 121 .,<br />
That he would not rule the City Railway Bill out <strong>of</strong> order on thc)'g~ound "~bat . ianol~ had been<br />
resumed in connection with tile proposed City . Railway,, aml. no Proviq~Lon mad'e, in the Bill<br />
to'amend-the Public Works'Act in relation to the acquisition. <strong>of</strong> the Nod, 14 :3 .<br />
That the measures covered bv a moti,)a for the su :31tonsion . <strong>of</strong> the b ta'' ndiL .i;~Ordcrs u~qd not e<br />
similar in character, 144 .<br />
VOL . PACE . VOL . PAGE .