1904 - 1913 - Parliament of New South Wales
1904 - 1913 - Parliament of New South Wales
1904 - 1913 - Parliament of New South Wales
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
'<br />
INDEX .<br />
xxxii<br />
REFERENCES TO T1 IE VOTES 'A -ND VEUCZEDING~-il VOL., 1--22-N D PARLIAMPNT-SESSION 19 1 1-1912 .<br />
- Assriirn,y JOINT, - ~<br />
VOLUMES . VOLUXES.<br />
Vol. . I PAGE. VOL. I PAGIS .<br />
SPEAKER (conihated) :-<br />
llur,iNas~ov (coatinu~d)<br />
That lie would riot at1that stiige direct a member, in reference to whom a Charge was beingi<br />
considere(l, to withdraw from the Chamber, although a precedent was being create([ by his'<br />
reinaining, 124 .<br />
That tho. PLII,li(. \V01-kS and Closer Settlement Funds (Amendment) Bill Nvin3 pr6perly before the<br />
House, although ro"Qrring to the Sinking Fund Reneivals J~ill, riot then pasocd and<br />
effecting the Guverninunt Railways Act without inention in the Title, 161.<br />
That, the rucognised lewier <strong>of</strong> the House controlled the business <strong>of</strong> tire house, and could at<br />
any time direct th4t a motion be taken, 167.<br />
That the Stalul)'DutieE5 (Aul,ndniunt) Bill was strictly in accordance with the Message, and wab<br />
in m-der, 174.<br />
That the res-lation suspending portion <strong>of</strong> it Sessional Order to permit <strong>of</strong> the discuasion <strong>of</strong> -I<br />
Notice A <strong>of</strong> TNI~)tion <strong>of</strong> General Business continuing after half-pasc 7 u'eloch, did not prevent<br />
dier b~isiness being procceded with, 201 .<br />
Thatua motion niuved toy a front bencher needed no seconder, 203 .<br />
That inotion to) cen6ui,c the Speaker would andeipate debate oil a similar motion, notice <strong>of</strong><br />
which had beuri -given-that one motion should be 'V.,ithdrawn and the Other gi<br />
precedence <strong>of</strong> otho,r business, 207 .<br />
That the practiec estaZilished might lie continued <strong>of</strong> bringing in a Public Works Bill oil<br />
ve'll<br />
the<br />
same day as the Eesolution that the work be carried out was passed, 222 .<br />
That the I-Iousirn, Bill was not it variance with the Public Works Act, and the Public Service<br />
Act, and was not out <strong>of</strong> order, 2-26 .<br />
That the action <strong>of</strong> the Speaker could not be questioned at any time except s by specific motion,<br />
but any 11unorable Member might move to dissent from the tSpf-ak- er' ruling, '231 .<br />
That it motion to dissent from the Speaker's action in removing the Honorab!e Morriber for<br />
Darling Harbour was in order, .23l .<br />
That the docision as to file, urgency <strong>of</strong> a motion for the adjournment <strong>of</strong> the House under the<br />
49th Standing order (lid riot resCon the Speaker, 237 .<br />
That the State Coal-mines Bill was riou inconsistent with the Government Railways Act, was<br />
within tire 0rder <strong>of</strong> Leave, and in order, 246 . 1<br />
That the State Coal-iiiines Bill Ali(I not arriend or contravene the Public Works'Act, and was<br />
properly before the House, 246 .<br />
That the <strong>Parliament</strong>ary Itepre§entatives. Allowance Bill, was in order, and the point raised,<br />
that it proposed a pecuniary benefit to each Member, which could riot bu held to be a<br />
matter <strong>of</strong> State policy, was riot tonable, 277 .<br />
That the motion, "That the Honorable member be not further heard," could be moved on a<br />
Member speaking in reply, 295 .<br />
That the Parliarneritaxy Privile'ges Bill wits an exercise ef the powers conferred by Clause 5 ol<br />
thb Constitution Act and was in order, 290 .<br />
That it wits in order to include many bills in a motion for suspension <strong>of</strong> Standing Orders'to<br />
enable them to pass through'all their stages in one (lay, 301 .<br />
ON INIOTIONS FOR Anjoui,.NMENT UNDEn 49TI-I STANDING ORDE11-:-<br />
That motion in referenee to the agreement between the Acting Premier and the I-lonorable<br />
Member for the Upper Ifuriter, referred to oil 23rd AU .~Llsti was out <strong>of</strong> order, as the<br />
proposal to discuss the subject was in opposition to repeated iulingti, :.J .<br />
That subject <strong>of</strong> motion was sabju-Aice, 38 .<br />
That motion respecting the neeessity for providing more rolling-utock on the Railways, and<br />
the more expoditious conveyance <strong>of</strong> wheat, &c ., froni country diStri,CtS, was out <strong>of</strong> order,<br />
as it anticipated discussion <strong>of</strong> a motion on the Notice Paper, .67.<br />
That motion to discuss necessity for protecting witnesses befvre Royal Commission on shorta.-c<br />
<strong>of</strong> labour, &c ., was in order, 73 .<br />
That inotion in reference to the release <strong>of</strong> John Dixon, convicted <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>relice uoderAlic<br />
Industrial Disputes Law, naticipated discussion oil Order <strong>of</strong> the Day, fur repeal <strong>of</strong><br />
Industrial Disputes (Ainendnient) Act, 1909, and was therefore out <strong>of</strong> Order, A 9 .<br />
That motion respecting the attitudL <strong>of</strong> the Chief Commissioner for Railways towards<br />
Deputations wa8 out <strong>of</strong>. order ; it notice <strong>of</strong> inotion referring to this subject being oil the<br />
Paper, a notice could riot be withdrawn and a motion moved oil thu subject <strong>of</strong> that<br />
motion on the same day 94 . 1<br />
That motion, respecting shortage <strong>of</strong> railway trucks, was ill order, 97.<br />
That motion to discuss the furtiier encroachment on thu Botanic Gardens by-the widening o!<br />
~lacqnaric-street was ill oi der, 112 .<br />
That motion in reference to the riecessit3i <strong>of</strong> making representation to the Federal<br />
Government in connection with the operation <strong>of</strong> the old Age and Invalid Peusions<br />
Act, was not one <strong>of</strong> urgerto public importance, and could riot be entortaitied ; the inatter<br />
could,be dealt with in Ways and Means, 174 .<br />
That motion regarding die.closing <strong>of</strong> country refreshment shops oil Sundays, was definite<br />
and in order, 212.<br />
That Friday being a day on-which Government -business only muld be taken, it motion was<br />
out <strong>of</strong> order, 212 .<br />
That a motion regarding congestion <strong>of</strong> traffic in Sydney streets anticipated discussion oil<br />
it motion <strong>of</strong> which notice had been given, and'was out <strong>of</strong> oider, 220.<br />
That motion to discuss the electrification <strong>of</strong> the Illawaira Tramway system was iridefiriite<br />
'I and out <strong>of</strong> order, 233 .<br />
fiat the -foolinister accused ha%,ing iinreservfdly withdrawn the allegation complained <strong>of</strong>,<br />
motion was out <strong>of</strong> order, 239.<br />
That no motion being in tire box no division could be had on motion that second* motion<br />
be entertained, 239 .<br />
That motion to discuss file granting <strong>of</strong> reduced railway fares to Police anticipated discussion<br />
on a inotion <strong>of</strong> which notice had been given, and was, therefore, out <strong>of</strong> order, 276 .<br />
That inotion to discuss the management <strong>of</strong> tire StatL Brickworks, was definite and in order,<br />
although the subject bad recently been discussed in Connifittee <strong>of</strong> Supply, 282.<br />
That motion to discuss the necessity for expediting the construction <strong>of</strong> the North Coast<br />
Railway did not anticipate discussion .on the Government Railways (Duplication Board)<br />
Bill, nor on the1oan Bill, 307 .<br />
RULINGS OF DEPUTY<br />
That the Income Tax (Management) P~ffyas,in,order, although it raferred ;<br />
toan Act which was<br />
not yet passed, 240.