Final Mitigated Negative Declaration and Response to Comments
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration and Response to Comments Final Mitigated Negative Declaration and Response to Comments
present day boat-in campground) from the Graves in an effort to expand the newly opened Emerald Bay Resort/Camp. By 1924 the camp/resort included two and three room cottages, tents, butcher shop, express deport, post office, dance pavilion and steamer landing. Salter sold the Emerald Bay Resort/Camp to Joseph Watson in 1947, who in turn sold the property to the State of California in 1953, but Watson leased back some of the land and continued to operate the resort/camp for a few more years. In 1959, the resort officially closed and the buildings were removed. In 1961 the State of California approved plans for a boat-in campground in the area where the Emerald Bay Resort/Camp once existed and construction began a year later. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Three historic era cultural resource complexes have been recorded in Emerald Bay SP and include Vikingsholm, Emerald Bay Camp/Resort and Emerald Bay Underwater Park. As early as 1868 there were reports of vernacular Victorian residential structures near the site of the present-day pier and on the west end of Fannette Island. Several other residential structures are known from archival data and the photographic record. One of the developments was the Emerald Bay Resort which existed in the area (now occupied by the Vikingsholm complex) from the 1880s to the early 20 th century. No surface evidence of any of these structures has been discovered. Standing structures in the Vikingsholm complex include Vikingsholm, the duplex, the warehouse, the gardener’s cottage, the powerhouse, remains of the boat slip near the duplex, and the remains of the Teahouse on Fannette Island. The Comyn/Law property is a 2.2-acre residential parcel immediately west of the boat camp area. The property was developed as a residence from the 1890s until purchased by Realtor Moisey Matuchansky in 1949. The property was then leased to the adjacent Emerald Bay Camp, and the combined properties were renamed Emerald Bay Resort (not to be confused with the Emerald Bay Resort at the west end of the bay of the late 19 th century). This portion of the park includes numerous archaeological features consisting of rock walls, retaining walls, stairs/steps, concrete foundations, earthen pads, garden borders, paths, roads, jetties and a dump. The Emerald Bay Camp/Resort consists of the foundations of a former lake-side cabin resort on the shore of Lake Tahoe, about ¾-mile from Vikingsholm. Numerous dry-laid and mortared stone features remain, including structure footings, paths and water channels. The site was officially recorded in 2003, with a subsequent update, to document 116 historic archaeological features that made up the camp/resort in 2004. Several submerged cultural resources have been recorded in the Emerald Bay Underwater Park and include two barges located off the western shore of Eagle Point, several small recreation boats identified near Emerald Bay Camp/Resort, an underwater electric cable (dating to 1929) that traverses across the mouth of Emerald Bay, and several refuse deposits. In 2004, Panamerican Consultants, Inc. conducted a submerged cultural resources survey of Emerald Bay using remote sensing technology which resulted in the identification of 51 additional unknown targets, possibly representing additional underwater cultural resources. Asian Clam Control Project IS/MND Emerald Bay State Park California Department of Parks and Recreation 38
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND PUBLIC RESOURCE CODE The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that projects financed by, or requiring the discretionary approval of public agencies in California, must consider the effects that a project has on historical and unique archaeological resources (Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21083.2). Historical resources are defined as buildings, sites, structures, or objects, each of which may have historical, architectural, archaeological, cultural or scientific importance (PRC Section 50201). The CEQA Guidelines (Section 15064.5) define three cases in which a property may qualify as a historical resource for the purpose of CEQA review (A through C): A. The resources are listed in or determined eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). The CRHR is a statewide list of Historical Resources with qualities assessed significant in the context of the state’s heritage. The CRHR functions as an authoritative guide that is intended to be used by state and local agencies to indicate types of cultural resources that require protection, to a prudent and feasible extent, from project-related substantial adverse changes. Properties that are listed in the NRHP, or are eligible for listing, are considered eligible for listing in the CRHR, and thus are significant historical resources for the purpose of CEQA (PRC Section 5024.1(d)(1)). PRC Section 5024.1 defines eligibility requirements and states that a resource may be eligible for inclusion in the CRHR if it: 1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; 2. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; 3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or 4. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Properties must retain integrity to be eligible for listing on the CRHR. B. The resource is included in a local register of historic resources, as defined in Section 5020.1(k) of the PRC, or is identified as significant in a historical resources survey that meets the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the PRC (unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that the resource is not historically or culturally significant). C. The lead agency determines that the resource may be a historical resource as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(j), 5024.1, or significant as supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. Asian Clam Control Project IS/MND Emerald Bay State Park California Department of Parks and Recreation 39
- Page 13 and 14: the infestation is 600 feet. The ba
- Page 15 and 16: 15 Asian Clam Control Project Final
- Page 17 and 18: 17 Asian Clam Control Project Final
- Page 19 and 20: 19 Asian Clam Control Project Final
- Page 21 and 22: More detail on the range of lake bo
- Page 23 and 24: The MND states that there will be n
- Page 25 and 26: arriers have not been secured with
- Page 27 and 28: INITIAL STUDY MITIGATED NEGATIVE DE
- Page 29 and 30: Pursuant to Section 21082.1 of the
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUC
- Page 33 and 34: This chapter provides a list of tho
- Page 35 and 36: The invasion and establishment of A
- Page 37 and 38: the edges of the rubber sheets for
- Page 39 and 40: 2.10 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS DPR re
- Page 41 and 42: 1. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALL
- Page 43 and 44: and receives approval from the Cali
- Page 45 and 46: DISCUSSION a-e) As noted in the Env
- Page 47 and 48: for six criteria pollutants after t
- Page 49 and 50: IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. ENVIRONME
- Page 51 and 52: Water Plant Community are not expec
- Page 53 and 54: (Helisoma newberryi) creeks. Lake T
- Page 55 and 56: mouth of Emerald Bay. Creating nois
- Page 57 and 58: ecosystems as wetlands, meadows, an
- Page 59 and 60: V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. ENVIRONMENTA
- Page 61 and 62: and prolonged droughts (Lindström
- Page 63: Roads expanded and upgraded the roa
- Page 67 and 68: esources in consultation with the O
- Page 69 and 70: Liquefaction and Landslide Hazards
- Page 71 and 72: would not increase as a result of t
- Page 73 and 74: • Carbon Dioxide - The natural pr
- Page 75 and 76: VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIA
- Page 77 and 78: emergencies and activities would al
- Page 79 and 80: WOULD THE PROJECT: a) Violate any w
- Page 81 and 82: Mitigation Measure Hydro-1: Water Q
- Page 83 and 84: DISCUSSION a) The proposed project
- Page 85 and 86: XII. NOISE. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING T
- Page 87 and 88: DISCUSSION a) Project activities re
- Page 89 and 90: DISCUSSION a-c) The project does no
- Page 91 and 92: WOULD THE PROJECT: a) Result in sig
- Page 93 and 94: implemented to inform the public, s
- Page 95 and 96: D E F convenience decreasing as den
- Page 97 and 98: c) This project will not will not i
- Page 99 and 100: significant environmental effects?
- Page 101 and 102: d) Most project-related environment
- Page 103 and 104: GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS No project
- Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER 6 REFERENCES Chapter 2 Univ
- Page 107 and 108: Cultural Resources Barrett, S. A.,
- Page 109 and 110: Murphy and C.M. Knopp. Report prepa
- Page 111 and 112: Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRP
- Page 113 and 114: Report Preparation CALIFORNIA DEPAR
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND PUBLIC RESOURCE CODE<br />
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that projects financed by, or<br />
requiring the discretionary approval of public agencies in California, must consider the effects<br />
that a project has on his<strong>to</strong>rical <strong>and</strong> unique archaeological resources (Public Resources Code<br />
[PRC] Section 21083.2). His<strong>to</strong>rical resources are defined as buildings, sites, structures, or<br />
objects, each of which may have his<strong>to</strong>rical, architectural, archaeological, cultural or scientific<br />
importance (PRC Section 50201).<br />
The CEQA Guidelines (Section 15064.5) define three cases in which a property may qualify as<br />
a his<strong>to</strong>rical resource for the purpose of CEQA review (A through C):<br />
A. The resources are listed in or determined eligible for listing in the California<br />
Register of His<strong>to</strong>rical Resources (CRHR). The CRHR is a statewide list of<br />
His<strong>to</strong>rical Resources with qualities assessed significant in the context of the<br />
state’s heritage. The CRHR functions as an authoritative guide that is intended<br />
<strong>to</strong> be used by state <strong>and</strong> local agencies <strong>to</strong> indicate types of cultural resources that<br />
require protection, <strong>to</strong> a prudent <strong>and</strong> feasible extent, from project-related<br />
substantial adverse changes. Properties that are listed in the NRHP, or are<br />
eligible for listing, are considered eligible for listing in the CRHR, <strong>and</strong> thus are<br />
significant his<strong>to</strong>rical resources for the purpose of CEQA (PRC Section<br />
5024.1(d)(1)).<br />
PRC Section 5024.1 defines eligibility requirements <strong>and</strong> states that a resource may be eligible<br />
for inclusion in the CRHR if it:<br />
1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution <strong>to</strong> the<br />
broad patterns of California’s his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>and</strong> cultural heritage;<br />
2. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past;<br />
3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or<br />
method of construction, represents the work of an important creative<br />
individual, or possesses high artistic values; or<br />
4. Has yielded, or may be likely <strong>to</strong> yield, information important in prehis<strong>to</strong>ry or<br />
his<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />
Properties must retain integrity <strong>to</strong> be eligible for listing on the CRHR.<br />
B. The resource is included in a local register of his<strong>to</strong>ric resources, as defined in<br />
Section 5020.1(k) of the PRC, or is identified as significant in a his<strong>to</strong>rical<br />
resources survey that meets the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the PRC<br />
(unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that the resource is not<br />
his<strong>to</strong>rically or culturally significant).<br />
C. The lead agency determines that the resource may be a his<strong>to</strong>rical resource as<br />
defined in PRC Section 5020.1(j), 5024.1, or significant as supported by<br />
substantial evidence in light of the whole record.<br />
Asian Clam Control Project IS/MND<br />
Emerald Bay State Park<br />
California Department of Parks <strong>and</strong> Recreation<br />
39