- Page 1 and 2: FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIO
- Page 3 and 4: 2009. Initial surveys estimated thi
- Page 5 and 6: Emerald Bay will require traffic co
- Page 7 and 8: 7 Asian Clam Control Project Final
- Page 9 and 10: 9 Asian Clam Control Project Final
- Page 11 and 12: LAHONTAN REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CON
- Page 13: the infestation is 600 feet. The ba
- Page 17 and 18: 17 Asian Clam Control Project Final
- Page 19 and 20: 19 Asian Clam Control Project Final
- Page 21 and 22: More detail on the range of lake bo
- Page 23 and 24: The MND states that there will be n
- Page 25 and 26: arriers have not been secured with
- Page 27 and 28: INITIAL STUDY MITIGATED NEGATIVE DE
- Page 29 and 30: Pursuant to Section 21082.1 of the
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUC
- Page 33 and 34: This chapter provides a list of tho
- Page 35 and 36: The invasion and establishment of A
- Page 37 and 38: the edges of the rubber sheets for
- Page 39 and 40: 2.10 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS DPR re
- Page 41 and 42: 1. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALL
- Page 43 and 44: and receives approval from the Cali
- Page 45 and 46: DISCUSSION a-e) As noted in the Env
- Page 47 and 48: for six criteria pollutants after t
- Page 49 and 50: IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. ENVIRONME
- Page 51 and 52: Water Plant Community are not expec
- Page 53 and 54: (Helisoma newberryi) creeks. Lake T
- Page 55 and 56: mouth of Emerald Bay. Creating nois
- Page 57 and 58: ecosystems as wetlands, meadows, an
- Page 59 and 60: V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. ENVIRONMENTA
- Page 61 and 62: and prolonged droughts (Lindström
- Page 63 and 64: Roads expanded and upgraded the roa
- Page 65 and 66:
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AC
- Page 67 and 68:
esources in consultation with the O
- Page 69 and 70:
Liquefaction and Landslide Hazards
- Page 71 and 72:
would not increase as a result of t
- Page 73 and 74:
• Carbon Dioxide - The natural pr
- Page 75 and 76:
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIA
- Page 77 and 78:
emergencies and activities would al
- Page 79 and 80:
WOULD THE PROJECT: a) Violate any w
- Page 81 and 82:
Mitigation Measure Hydro-1: Water Q
- Page 83 and 84:
DISCUSSION a) The proposed project
- Page 85 and 86:
XII. NOISE. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING T
- Page 87 and 88:
DISCUSSION a) Project activities re
- Page 89 and 90:
DISCUSSION a-c) The project does no
- Page 91 and 92:
WOULD THE PROJECT: a) Result in sig
- Page 93 and 94:
implemented to inform the public, s
- Page 95 and 96:
D E F convenience decreasing as den
- Page 97 and 98:
c) This project will not will not i
- Page 99 and 100:
significant environmental effects?
- Page 101 and 102:
d) Most project-related environment
- Page 103 and 104:
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS No project
- Page 105 and 106:
CHAPTER 6 REFERENCES Chapter 2 Univ
- Page 107 and 108:
Cultural Resources Barrett, S. A.,
- Page 109 and 110:
Murphy and C.M. Knopp. Report prepa
- Page 111 and 112:
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRP
- Page 113 and 114:
Report Preparation CALIFORNIA DEPAR
- Page 115 and 116:
APPENDIX B SENSITIVE SPECIES LIST _
- Page 117 and 118:
Martes pennanti o fisher (C) Plants
- Page 119 and 120:
If a Federal agency is involved wit
- Page 121 and 122:
APPENDIX C ACRONYMS _______________