- Page 1 and 2:
FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIO
- Page 3 and 4:
2009. Initial surveys estimated thi
- Page 5 and 6:
Emerald Bay will require traffic co
- Page 7 and 8:
7 Asian Clam Control Project Final
- Page 9 and 10:
9 Asian Clam Control Project Final
- Page 11 and 12:
LAHONTAN REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CON
- Page 13 and 14:
the infestation is 600 feet. The ba
- Page 15 and 16:
15 Asian Clam Control Project Final
- Page 17 and 18:
17 Asian Clam Control Project Final
- Page 19 and 20:
19 Asian Clam Control Project Final
- Page 21 and 22:
More detail on the range of lake bo
- Page 23 and 24:
The MND states that there will be n
- Page 25 and 26:
arriers have not been secured with
- Page 27 and 28:
INITIAL STUDY MITIGATED NEGATIVE DE
- Page 29 and 30:
Pursuant to Section 21082.1 of the
- Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUC
- Page 33 and 34:
This chapter provides a list of tho
- Page 35 and 36:
The invasion and establishment of A
- Page 37 and 38:
the edges of the rubber sheets for
- Page 39 and 40:
2.10 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS DPR re
- Page 41 and 42:
1. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALL
- Page 43 and 44:
and receives approval from the Cali
- Page 45 and 46:
DISCUSSION a-e) As noted in the Env
- Page 47 and 48:
for six criteria pollutants after t
- Page 49 and 50:
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. ENVIRONME
- Page 51 and 52:
Water Plant Community are not expec
- Page 53 and 54:
(Helisoma newberryi) creeks. Lake T
- Page 55 and 56:
mouth of Emerald Bay. Creating nois
- Page 57 and 58:
ecosystems as wetlands, meadows, an
- Page 59 and 60:
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. ENVIRONMENTA
- Page 61 and 62:
and prolonged droughts (Lindström
- Page 63 and 64: Roads expanded and upgraded the roa
- Page 65 and 66: CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AC
- Page 67 and 68: esources in consultation with the O
- Page 69 and 70: Liquefaction and Landslide Hazards
- Page 71 and 72: would not increase as a result of t
- Page 73 and 74: • Carbon Dioxide - The natural pr
- Page 75 and 76: VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIA
- Page 77 and 78: emergencies and activities would al
- Page 79 and 80: WOULD THE PROJECT: a) Violate any w
- Page 81 and 82: Mitigation Measure Hydro-1: Water Q
- Page 83 and 84: DISCUSSION a) The proposed project
- Page 85 and 86: XII. NOISE. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING T
- Page 87 and 88: DISCUSSION a) Project activities re
- Page 89 and 90: DISCUSSION a-c) The project does no
- Page 91 and 92: WOULD THE PROJECT: a) Result in sig
- Page 93 and 94: implemented to inform the public, s
- Page 95 and 96: D E F convenience decreasing as den
- Page 97 and 98: c) This project will not will not i
- Page 99 and 100: significant environmental effects?
- Page 101 and 102: d) Most project-related environment
- Page 103 and 104: GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS No project
- Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER 6 REFERENCES Chapter 2 Univ
- Page 107 and 108: Cultural Resources Barrett, S. A.,
- Page 109 and 110: Murphy and C.M. Knopp. Report prepa
- Page 111 and 112: Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRP
- Page 113: Report Preparation CALIFORNIA DEPAR
- Page 117 and 118: Martes pennanti o fisher (C) Plants
- Page 119 and 120: If a Federal agency is involved wit
- Page 121 and 122: APPENDIX C ACRONYMS _______________