14.05.2014 Views

Report Card on Wait Times in Canada

Report Card on Wait Times in Canada

Report Card on Wait Times in Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Card</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Wait</strong> <strong>Times</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> 2012<br />

Treatment/service/procedure<br />

Plastic surgery<br />

NL PE NS NB QC ON MB SK AB BC<br />

Breast cancer rec<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> 4 weeks ? ? ? ? ? F ? " ? F<br />

Carpal tunnel release 2 m<strong>on</strong>ths ? ? " B ? ? ? C D ?<br />

Sk<strong>in</strong> cancer treatment 4 m<strong>on</strong>ths ? ? " ? ? ? ? " ? ?<br />

Pediatric surgery*<br />

Advanced Dental Caries: carious lesi<strong>on</strong>s/ pa<strong>in</strong> 90 days ? ? " ? ? " ? ? ? ?<br />

Cleft Lip/Palate 21 days ? ? " ? ? " ? ? ? ?<br />

Strabismus: 2–6 years old 90 days ? ? " ? ? " ? ? ? ?<br />

Psychiatry (scheduled)<br />

Early psychosis 2 weeks ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?<br />

Postpartum severe mood disorders 4 weeks ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?<br />

Acute/urgent mental health c<strong>on</strong>cerns 1 week ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?<br />

Sight restorati<strong>on</strong> ! ! ! ! ! !<br />

Cataract surgery 16 weeks B C C A A A D C B B<br />

Methodology<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial websites from April–May 2012:<br />

A: 80–100% of populati<strong>on</strong> treated with<strong>in</strong> benchmark<br />

B: 70–79% of populati<strong>on</strong> treated with<strong>in</strong> benchmark<br />

C: 60–69% of populati<strong>on</strong> treated with<strong>in</strong> benchmark<br />

D: 50–59% of populati<strong>on</strong> treated with<strong>in</strong> benchmark<br />

F: Less than 50% of populati<strong>on</strong> treated with<strong>in</strong> benchmark<br />

na: no data are provided or data do not lend themselves to estimates of performance. The diag<strong>on</strong>al l<strong>in</strong>e " ⁄ " <strong>in</strong> white squares <strong>in</strong>dicates that the<br />

service is not provided i.e., CABGs <strong>in</strong> PEI.<br />

nb (no benchmarks) — pan-Canadian benchmarks for diagnostic imag<strong>in</strong>g have not yet been established by governments. Where prov<strong>in</strong>ces have reported<br />

wait times a colour grade is assigned to note progress made over the last 12 m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />

† Nati<strong>on</strong>al grades are based <strong>on</strong> a weighted average of prov<strong>in</strong>cial letter grades.<br />

! The category of bypass surgery (CABG) above represents <strong>on</strong>ly a small part of the full c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>uum of cardiac care to patients. Please refer to the<br />

Canadian <str<strong>on</strong>g>Card</str<strong>on</strong>g>iovascular Society website at www.ccs.ca for a full range of benchmarks for cardiovascular services and procedures. All of these<br />

benchmarks need to be adopted to mean<strong>in</strong>gfully address wait times.<br />

! Cancer radiotherapy. <strong>Wait</strong> times currently reflect <strong>on</strong>ly waits for external beam radiotherapy, while waits for brachytherapy (implanted radiati<strong>on</strong><br />

treatment, e.g., for prostate and cervical cancers) go unreported.<br />

? Symbol is assigned if the prov<strong>in</strong>ce does not report wait times for the treatment.<br />

" The prov<strong>in</strong>ce reports wait times for this specialty but not for the specific procedure <strong>in</strong> a manner that would permit it to be graded by WTA measures.<br />

% The prov<strong>in</strong>ce reports <strong>on</strong> procedures for this specialty.<br />

* These benchmarks enable pediatric <strong>in</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>s to compare with peers and share learn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Colour Grad<strong>in</strong>g Methodology<br />

This table identifies the change <strong>in</strong> wait times us<strong>in</strong>g the most recent publicly available data for each of the five priorities by prov<strong>in</strong>ce as follows:<br />

" decrease <strong>in</strong> wait times over the previous year<br />

# <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> wait times over the previous year<br />

$ no significant change (i.e., less than 5% <strong>in</strong>crease or less than 10% decrease) over the previous year<br />

? <strong>in</strong>sufficient data to make determ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong><br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!