13.05.2014 Views

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

338<br />

accredited utility training programs as part of the normal plant<br />

evaluation process, and reaccreditation is required every four<br />

years.<br />

Question: You have shown the Committee graphs that indicate overall<br />

industry performance appears to be improving and you have also<br />

discussed the long-term 1990 goals. Yet 1985 appeared to be one<br />

of the worst years yet for nuclear power with the Davis-Besse and<br />

Rancho Seco events and with the problems at TVA. How can you say<br />

that significant improvements have been made in light of the<br />

above problems? What did INPO do to prevent the above problems?<br />

Answer: An important aspect of the TVA situation that is often overlooked<br />

is the following: TVA management took the action to shut down<br />

the Brown's Ferry plant and later the Sequoyah plant. TVA<br />

managers were certainly mindful of interactions with the NRC and<br />

input from INPO, but it was TVA management that took that<br />

initiative; and management action to shut down the plants is a<br />

far better situation for TVA, and for the industry, than<br />

continuing to operate until a serious event occurs. So in that<br />

sense, the management action at TVA was healthy.<br />

In the case of Rancho Seco and Davis Besse, both the NRC and INPO<br />

had recognized developing potential problems, and from my own<br />

personal knowledge I can report that both organizations were<br />

working with the senior management of both utilities to bring<br />

about improvements in the way the plants were operated. In<br />

retrospect, we weren't early enough and perhaps we weren't<br />

aggressive enough.<br />

In early Fall of 1985, INPO did take action to request that the<br />

Rancho Seco plant remain shut down until certain corrective<br />

actions were taken, and improvements or upgrades of certain<br />

operational activities were put in place before the plant started<br />

up some five weeks later.<br />

We have strengthened our evaluation program as a result of<br />

lessons learned at TVA, Rancho Seco, and Davis-Besse, and will do<br />

everything we can to assist utilities and the government in<br />

heading off those kinds of problems in the future. Just as you<br />

do, we regret the situation faced by all three utilities<br />

involved.<br />

Nevertheless, as indicated in my testimony, the overall industry<br />

record has been one of improving performance during recent years.<br />

Question: INPO's mission is to promote the highest levels of safety and<br />

reliability -- to promote excellence -- in the operation of<br />

nuclear electric generating plants. How well qualified is the<br />

INPO staff to set and enforce standards of excellence?<br />

2-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!