13.05.2014 Views

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

315<br />

-2-<br />

Answer 17<br />

(continued): forced cooling. As predicted, the fuel and sodium coolant<br />

temperatures initially increased until the combined effects<br />

of thermal expansion and natural coolant circulation shut the<br />

reactor down.<br />

In the loss-of-heat-sink test, power to the secondary cooling<br />

system was turned off while the reactor continued operating.<br />

Again, the reactor shutdown without operator action as a<br />

result of the self-generated negative reactivity feedback<br />

characteristics of the system. Further analyses and<br />

confirmatory testing will be conducted to assure that<br />

operator action, if attempted, could not defeat the safe,<br />

inherent self-shutdown capability of the system. The strong<br />

negative reactivity feedback exhibited in these tests are due<br />

to a combination of the high heat conductivity of the metal<br />

fuel and the thermal inertia of the large volume of pool<br />

sodium in the EBR-II.<br />

Advanced LMR's being developed by DOE are utilizing these<br />

features. Work is also continuing in support of these<br />

advanced concepts to develop an improved metal fuel and to<br />

demonstrate new, simpler processes for the metal fuel cycle.<br />

The EBR-II tests demonstrated that liquid metal reactors can<br />

be designed to be self-regulating in protecting operators,<br />

the public, and the financial investment. The properties

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!