13.05.2014 Views

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

267<br />

QUESTION 10. (Continued) 3 -<br />

indications that taken together serve as the basis for any<br />

estimate of the likelihood of a core melt accident.<br />

With regard to quantitative indications, the Commission has<br />

previously stated that the most complete and recent PRAs suggest<br />

.3<br />

core-melt frequencies in the range of 10 per reactor year to<br />

4 -4<br />

10 per reactor year, with a typical value of 3x10 per reactor<br />

year. Based on this latter value as an industry average and given<br />

a population of 100 reactors operating over a period of 20 years,<br />

the Commission has estimated the likelihood of a severe core melt<br />

accident in the next 20 years to be 45 percent. (See the<br />

Commission's response to Question 21(a) in the April 16, 1985<br />

letter to Congressman Markey from Chairman Palladino.) The value<br />

of 45 percent has been estimated by the Commission through the<br />

- X t<br />

formula P=l-e , where P is the cumulative probability of an<br />

event occurring over time t, and x is the likelihood of the event.<br />

-4<br />

In this case, t equals 20 years and x equals 3x10 per reactor<br />

year times 100 reactors.<br />

The PRA estimates given above have substantial uncertainties that<br />

span a factor of about 10 above and below the reported values. I<br />

believe it is mandatory that consideration of these uncertainties<br />

be factored into any application of such point estimates. Thus,<br />

the cumulative probability of a core meltdown accident in the next<br />

/ /

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!