13.05.2014 Views

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

185<br />

utility writes a comprehensive report, which is provided to<br />

INPO, that describes how the accreditation criteria are<br />

being met.<br />

o Second, an accreditation team, composed of training experts<br />

from INPO and other utilities, visits the plant and<br />

evaluates the training programs. After the utility corrects<br />

identified weaknesses, the team's recommendations, along<br />

with the utility's responses and corrective actions, are<br />

presented to the National <strong>Nuclear</strong> Accrediting Board in a<br />

written report.<br />

o Third, the decision to award or defer accreditation is made<br />

by the National <strong>Nuclear</strong> Accrediting Board.<br />

The National <strong>Nuclear</strong> Accrediting Board is the independent<br />

decision-making body that awards or defers accreditation of<br />

utility training programs. The Board operates under the auspices<br />

of INPO, but it is totally independent in its deliberations and<br />

decision-making process.<br />

When training programs are presented to the Board, members<br />

examine the report of the accreditation team and the utility's<br />

responses, as well as the utility self-evaluation report. The<br />

Board's final decision comes only after its meeting with<br />

representatives from the plant and training staffs. This is a<br />

meeting that involves page-by-page review of the written report,<br />

and it is followed by private deliberations by the Board to<br />

determine whether the training programs meet the accreditation<br />

objectives and criteria.<br />

To maintain accreditation, INPO requires a status report two<br />

years after training programs are accredited. Further, each<br />

program must be fully reaccredited every four years.<br />

The National <strong>Nuclear</strong> Accrediting Board includes four categories<br />

of membership: senior utility representatives, non-nuclear<br />

training experts, representatives from the post-secondary<br />

educational community, and individuals nominated by the U.S.<br />

<strong>Nuclear</strong> Regulatory Commission (NRC).<br />

A working board of five individuals meets to consider<br />

accreditation for each nuclear plant's training programs. This<br />

working board includes one or more individuals from each of the<br />

classifications listed above and must have a majority of<br />

representatives from outside the nuclear utility industry.<br />

• 12-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!