13.05.2014 Views

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Congressional Hearings Transcript

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

no<br />

speculation in the press that it was the same type reactor that was<br />

at <strong>Chernobyl</strong>, other speculation that it is not.<br />

The question is, Do we know what types of reactors are being<br />

built and are we faced with the same casual attitude toward safety<br />

that apparently triggered the <strong>Chernobyl</strong> accident?<br />

Dr. Bunch. It is my understanding that the reactors in Cuba are<br />

what are called VVER-400; namely, 400 megawatt class, pressurized<br />

water reactors. It is also my understanding that the particular<br />

designs are the Soviet export models, with containments, somewhat<br />

analogous to U.S. PWR's of that size.<br />

I am finally given to understand that the particular concept<br />

chosen is one similar to that already being operated in Hungary.<br />

The Soviets claim that it has substantial safety features not found<br />

in the RBMK, the <strong>Chernobyl</strong> type of design. Whether or not its<br />

construction quality and the details of the safety systems are what<br />

we would expect in this country I think is doubtful, but I don't<br />

have the details of the Cuban design at this point.<br />

Senator Wallop. Have we ever had any access to the Soviet reactors<br />

and their buildings and design so we have some confidence in<br />

how<br />

Dr. Bunch. There have been a number of United States citizens<br />

who have been granted tours of Soviet reactors in the past. There<br />

have been extensive discussions, for example, with the Fins, who<br />

have a Soviet style machine. The Fins, and the Germans have had<br />

full access to many of the design documents of some of these systems<br />

and have been asked to evaluate them.<br />

One of the benefits of a multinational, international nuclear society<br />

is that we do in fact, have broad access to information about<br />

these systems.<br />

Senator Wallop. Do we have broad access yet to the information<br />

of all the details of the <strong>Chernobyl</strong> accident?<br />

Dr. Bunch. As Mr. Denton and I both were trying to convey, we<br />

have exhaustively examined the Soviet literature that has been<br />

published. There is much that we don't have.<br />

Senator Wallop. That is not precisely mv question.<br />

Dr. Bunch. I was giving you a long "no,' sir.<br />

Senator Wallop. That is what I was afraid you were giving me.<br />

Mr. Denton. Senator, we have attempted to carry on a dialog on<br />

safety with all countries, but when they invaded Afghanistan, as a<br />

matter of national policy, we terminated that discussion with the<br />

Soviets. We have not had a safety discussion with them since that<br />

time.<br />

Senator Wallop. Has anyone?<br />

Mr. Denton. I can only speak for the NEC. We were in the process<br />

of trying to reestablish that communication link when <strong>Chernobyl</strong><br />

occurred.<br />

Senator Wallop. Mr. Meyers, can you add anything to that? Presumably<br />

if they are not talking to us—not presumably at all, but<br />

maybe me if they are not talking to us they are talking to somebody<br />

else and presumably we could have access to that information.<br />

Mr. Meyers. Well, they clearly have spoken to the IAEA management<br />

who, as you know, have been there. They apparently have<br />

made certain agreements with them to release information. We

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!