Tanzania Multi Stakeholder Map - WebNG

More documents

Recommendations

Info

1.0 INTRODUCTION A three days workshop of stakeholders for the Pesticides and Poverty project was organised by AGENDA for Environment and Responsible Development (AGENDA) and Tanzania Plantation and Agricultural Workers Union (TPAWU). The workshop was held at the Centre for Continuing Education, University of Dar es Salaam from 03 – 05 August 2005. The main aim of the workshop was to build capacity and raise awareness among key stakeholders, and bringing them together into a dialogue and action so as to assist the effective implementation of the Chemical Conventions and Processes in Tanzania. This will help to integrate an environmental dimension into national development priorities and promote sustainable livelihoods in rural areas. This workshop is the initial activity in the implementation of the Pesticide and poverty project. The workshop was attended by 28 participants from government departments and agencies, academia, research institutions, NGOs and CBOs. The objectives of the first multistakeholders’ workshop were to: Disseminate the aims, objectives and activities of the project; Gather stakeholders’ inputs and to plan activities for three years; Present information on the current level of national implementation of the Chemical Conventions; Review needs of the participants and stakeholders for implementation of Chemical Conventions; Identify ways that Chemical Conventions and Processes could benefit stakeholders’ work and responsibilities; Identify areas of overlap at the level of national implementation for resource sharing; Identify possible joint initiatives between stakeholders; and Review and further develop the national stakeholders map. The workshop was structured into plenary session (paper presentation and discussion) and group work (refer to the workshop programme in appendix I). 2.0 OPENING 2.1 Welcome Remarks The welcome remarks were delivered by the Projects Manager of the AGENDA, Ms Saada K. Juma. In her remarks, she thanked the participants for availing time to attend the workshop and share their views on such important event. 1
Initially, she gave a brief history of AGENDA, which started as a DANIDA project and reconstituted to become an NGO on completion of the project to focus on the environment areas at national level, and as it grew it engage itself in International fora. AGENDA became member of the International POPS Elimination Network (IPEN) in the course of negations that led to adoption of the Stockholm Convention. AGENDA has organised a number of workshops on POPs and it is participating as an Anglophone Africa hub for the Global NGOs project: “International POPs Elimination Project (IPEP)” that promote active and effective CSOs/NGOs participation in implementation of the Stockholm Convention. She also outlined that the development of chemical conventions was brought about by the increasing global chemical problems, and the key problem is persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety (IFCS) conducted in depth study on POPs the result of which was the initiation of negotiation for a legally binding instrument, the Stockholm Convention, which was spearheaded by UNEP. International POPs Elimination Network (IPEN) was developed in 1998 by a group of NGOs around the world for lobbying for a strong Convention. Ms Saada emphasized further that, it is for the above reasons AGENDA came to know Pesticide Action Network (which is also a participating organisation in IPEN) and together they are now working on this project Pesticide and Poverty with the main objective of assisting developing countries to effectively implement International Chemical Conventions and Processes in order to integrate an environmental dimension into their development priorities and to promote sustainable livelihoods in rural areas. She pointing out that the expected outputs of the workshop are: increased stakeholders awareness on the project; current status of convention implementation at national level; plan of activities and stakeholder roles and responsibility in the project; complete National Stakeholders Map; capacity building needed for stakeholders and potential case studies identified. She concluded by expressing her sincere appreciation for the financial and technical support from PAN UK, PAN Africa, PAN AP, GEF and European Union. 2.2 Opening Speech The director general of the National Environment Management Council (NEMC), Dr. Magnus Ngoile on behalf of the Senior Permanent Secretary, Vice Presidents office, officiated the opening ceremony of the workshop. In his opening speech, he started by recognised the presence of the media and praised the role played by AGENDA and TPAWU in issues related to environmental protection. He also highlighted the magnitude of the obsolete stocks of pesticides from the inventory carried out in 1997 and current efforts to clean up the stocks i.e. the African 2
Page 1 and 2: PESTICIDES AND POVERTY Implementing
Page 3 and 4: 3.4 THEME IV: PROJECT DETAILS......
Page 5: MoH Ministry of Health MT Metric To
Page 9 and 10: iii. Rotterdam Convention - Mr. A.
Page 11 and 12: this project are aware of this trai
Page 13 and 14: On in implementation part the prese
Page 15 and 16: to that effect, however, EMA requir
Page 17 and 18: decision to prohibit transboundary
Page 19 and 20: Mr. Akhabuhaya - Registrar of Pesti
Page 21 and 22: over a broad range of sectors, havi
Page 23 and 24: laws, approved codes of conduct, et
Page 25 and 26: work plan preparation, there is a n
Page 27 and 28: After the presentation it was asked
Page 29 and 30: 4.0 GROUP WORK AND PRESENTATIONS 4.
Page 31 and 32: 2.2. Training individuals with trai
Page 33 and 34: 4.4 To introduce and promote new st
Page 35 and 36: 7.1. Identify effective ways to pro
Page 37 and 38: 8.1. Production and dissemination o
Page 39 and 40: GROUP 1 PROVISION OF INPUTS TO THE
Page 41 and 42: - misuse of pesticides as obstacle
Page 43 and 44: • Mapping of supply chain for pes
Page 45 and 46: 6.0. CLOSING REMARKS The closing re
Page 47 and 48: APPENDIX I WORKSHOP PROGRAMME 42
Page 49 and 50: 17.00 End Day 1 Day 2: Thursday 4 t
Page 51 and 52: APPENDIX II LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 46
Page 53 and 54: 7 Dr. Enock Masanja University of D
Page 55: 18 Dr. Ruth Minja Tanzania Associat
Page 58 and 59:
Pesticides and Poverty Implementing
Page 60 and 61:
Activity 6 - CASE STUDIES - Documen
Page 62 and 63:
CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ST
Page 64 and 65:
In recent decades, the risks posed
Page 66 and 67:
exemptions granted should minimize
Page 68 and 69:
c) Report to the Conference of the
Page 70 and 71:
and dissemination of available alte
Page 72 and 73:
The issue of management of POPs fal
Page 74 and 75:
Table 1: List of stakeholders and t
Page 76 and 77:
Institution xxiv) TANESCO xxv) Seed
Page 78 and 79:
5.0 CHALLENGES AND PLANNED EFFORTS
Page 80 and 81:
5.2 Planned Efforts Some of the pla
Page 82 and 83:
7.0 CONCLUDING REMARKS The Stockhol
Page 84 and 85:
Reviews notifications from parties
Page 86 and 87:
4.3 Roles of stakeholders: Provisio
Page 88 and 89:
provides early warning for developi
Page 90 and 91:
TABLE 1: CHEMICALS SUBJECT TO THE P
Page 92 and 93:
Chemical Category Registration Stat
Page 94 and 95:
PAPER ON BASEL AND BAMAKO CONVENTIO
Page 96 and 97:
1.0 Introduction 1.1 History of the
Page 98 and 99:
⇒ The prevention and monitoring o
Page 100 and 101:
need to be disposed of. Hence trans
Page 102 and 103:
(i) Ban amendment (1995) During its
Page 104 and 105:
⇒ To encourage treatment and disp
Page 106 and 107:
9.0 Implementation status of the Ba
Page 108 and 109:
(iii) (iv) Disposal of DNOC at Ceme
Page 110 and 111:
(i) (ii) (vii) Management of hazard
Page 112 and 113:
BRIEF HISTORY INTERNATIONAL CODE OF
Page 114 and 115:
CTD B)Defficient Laws and Regulatio
Page 116 and 117:
2025. Examples of broader goals emb
Page 118 and 119:
particular focus on food security n
Page 120 and 121:
spraying with pesticides, including
Page 122 and 123:
4.2 How do the MDGs link to Pestici
Page 124 and 125:
• Impacts on certain populations,
Page 126 and 127:
and sociological issues (“mainstr
Page 128 and 129:
6.3 Non-Income Poverty 6.3.1 Educat
Page 130 and 131:
7.2 Least-Toxic Controls In this ap
Page 132 and 133:
8.2 Rotterdam Convention Article 3:
Page 134 and 135:
coordination. Most important some C
Page 136 and 137:
Introduction PESTICIDE AND POVERTY:
Page 138 and 139:
Registration and Control • Respon
Page 140 and 141:
THE ASP AND CIVIL SOCIETY • The A
Page 142 and 143:
Coordination of NGOs • Use existi
Page 144 and 145:
How International Agreements Can Pr
Page 146 and 147:
4. Implementing the Codes & Convent
Page 148 and 149:
CPAM MONITORING TOOLS 1. Community
Page 150 and 151:
AGENDA Experience • Visits the vi
Page 152 and 153:
DESIGNING AN ECOLOGICAL MONITORING
Page 154:
PESTICIDES AND POVERTY CASE STUDIES
show all

Tanzania Multi Stakeholder Map - WebNG

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?