Tanzania Multi Stakeholder Map - WebNG

More documents

Recommendations

Info

an isolated area. The GCLA do coordinate with different stakeholders who have knowledge of incinerators for which type of incinerator fits for specific type of chemicals to be incinerated. It was further contributed that for construction of incinerators, there is adequate considerations to be made because, we can not live without them due to the reason that we can not reach a stage that we are well developed and well equipped for destruction of hazardous chemicals. It takes time for us to reach that stage and we still have the wastes to dispose. However, initiatives are underway worldwide to develop non-combustion destruction methods. 3.4 THEME IV: PROJECT DETAILS 3.4.1 Pesticide and Poverty: Multistakeholder Mapping Mr. Bashiru Abdul, Pesticides and Poverty project coordinator- AGENDA The presentation highlighted that stakeholder mapping was a first crucial activity for the Pesticide and poverty project and the involvement of each and every stakeholder is clearly connected with roles they play in respect to the implementation of the Chemical Conventions in Tanzania. Stakeholders were identified from their involvement in other national activities such as Stockholm Convention-National Implementation Plans (NIPs), the ASP, National Chemical Profiles of IFCS, and others. Stakeholders included Conventions’ Focal Points, regulators and other relevant government authorities, representatives of NGOs and civil society organisations working in rural areas or public health, representatives of key industries. The main aim of the mapping exercise is to identify all actors involved in pesticide use and management, including obsolete pesticides. Specific objectives of the mapping are to details ongoing relevant initiatives in Tanzania: what is working positively and what is preventing change; to identify different activities implemented by stakeholders, to devise means how the project could assist the stakeholder’s interests; to identify gaps and who could be taking responsibility; to enhance collaboration and ensure maximum value for core stakeholders; and to provide possible synergies between different national activities. The initial mapping exercise has identified major concerns regarding pesticides use. These include lack of an appropriate pesticide control legislation and lack of a modern pesticides approval/registration procedure; high rates of illiteracy and inability to read complex label instructions; use of foreign languages on labels; lack of monitoring of pollutants; easy access to acutely toxic substances; lack of capacity (manpower and financial resources) to advise on and enforce national 17
laws, approved codes of conduct, etc; lack of information provision and awareness raising aiming at the small enterprise level on rational storage, handling, use of pesticides and disposal of waste pesticides and empty containers and virtual impossibility of wearing protective clothing in hot & humid climates. Also absence of medical facilities and lack of antidotes; poor information provisions leading to a lack of knowledge about risks involved; use of cheap, often more dangerous substances and faulty equipment, Inadequate management and storage of obsolete stocks and used packaging materials and lack of facilities for proper waste management. Mr. Abdul gave a long list of stakeholders and their roles (Refer to the paper on Appendix III). 3.4.2 The African Stockpiles Project and Civil Society Mr. Yahya Msangi – TPAWU and Silvani Mng’anya - AGENDA The presentation gave a brief account of the African Stockpile Project (ASP). The project aims at clearing obsolete stocks (estimated to be 50,000 tonnes) and put in place preventive measures. Guiding principles of ASP are attainment of basic sustainable development criteria, to be country driven process, conjunction with existing activities, prevention of future accumulation, compliancy with international standards, destruction technologies and multi - stakeholder approach. The project will be implemented over 12 – 15 years and to be implemented through strategic partnership involving multiple stakeholders. Phase one involves Botswana, Cameroon, Cote d’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Morocco, Mali, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, South Africa, Swaziland, Tunisia and Tanzania. The presenters informed workshop participants that the participating country should demonstrate ownership and commitment to the objectives of the programme, collaboration with other stakeholders, preparation: assessment or inventory of the scale and scope of the problem, prevention – regulation, extension advice, policies, import controls, participation in international initiatives – POPs, PIC, Basel, International Dangerous Goods Maritime Code, Bamako. The implementation process of ASP will involve three major stages, namely Inventorying, Removal / Disposal, Preventive Measures. After the presentation, one participant asked whether the stockpile inventory were conducted involving different stakeholders supervised by NEMC. Isn’t true that the planned inventory under ASP will be reinventing the wheel, and the reaction was that the planned inventory is to validate the data and to correct the 18
Page 1 and 2: PESTICIDES AND POVERTY Implementing
Page 3 and 4: 3.4 THEME IV: PROJECT DETAILS......
Page 5 and 6: MoH Ministry of Health MT Metric To
Page 7 and 8: Initially, she gave a brief history
Page 9 and 10: iii. Rotterdam Convention - Mr. A.
Page 11 and 12: this project are aware of this trai
Page 13 and 14: On in implementation part the prese
Page 15 and 16: to that effect, however, EMA requir
Page 17 and 18: decision to prohibit transboundary
Page 19 and 20: Mr. Akhabuhaya - Registrar of Pesti
Page 21: over a broad range of sectors, havi
Page 25 and 26: work plan preparation, there is a n
Page 27 and 28: After the presentation it was asked
Page 29 and 30: 4.0 GROUP WORK AND PRESENTATIONS 4.
Page 31 and 32: 2.2. Training individuals with trai
Page 33 and 34: 4.4 To introduce and promote new st
Page 35 and 36: 7.1. Identify effective ways to pro
Page 37 and 38: 8.1. Production and dissemination o
Page 39 and 40: GROUP 1 PROVISION OF INPUTS TO THE
Page 41 and 42: - misuse of pesticides as obstacle
Page 43 and 44: • Mapping of supply chain for pes
Page 45 and 46: 6.0. CLOSING REMARKS The closing re
Page 47 and 48: APPENDIX I WORKSHOP PROGRAMME 42
Page 49 and 50: 17.00 End Day 1 Day 2: Thursday 4 t
Page 51 and 52: APPENDIX II LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 46
Page 53 and 54: 7 Dr. Enock Masanja University of D
Page 55: 18 Dr. Ruth Minja Tanzania Associat
Page 58 and 59: Pesticides and Poverty Implementing
Page 60 and 61: Activity 6 - CASE STUDIES - Documen
Page 62 and 63: CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ST
Page 64 and 65: In recent decades, the risks posed
Page 66 and 67: exemptions granted should minimize
Page 68 and 69: c) Report to the Conference of the
Page 70 and 71: and dissemination of available alte
Page 72 and 73:
The issue of management of POPs fal
Page 74 and 75:
Table 1: List of stakeholders and t
Page 76 and 77:
Institution xxiv) TANESCO xxv) Seed
Page 78 and 79:
5.0 CHALLENGES AND PLANNED EFFORTS
Page 80 and 81:
5.2 Planned Efforts Some of the pla
Page 82 and 83:
7.0 CONCLUDING REMARKS The Stockhol
Page 84 and 85:
Reviews notifications from parties
Page 86 and 87:
4.3 Roles of stakeholders: Provisio
Page 88 and 89:
provides early warning for developi
Page 90 and 91:
TABLE 1: CHEMICALS SUBJECT TO THE P
Page 92 and 93:
Chemical Category Registration Stat
Page 94 and 95:
PAPER ON BASEL AND BAMAKO CONVENTIO
Page 96 and 97:
1.0 Introduction 1.1 History of the
Page 98 and 99:
⇒ The prevention and monitoring o
Page 100 and 101:
need to be disposed of. Hence trans
Page 102 and 103:
(i) Ban amendment (1995) During its
Page 104 and 105:
⇒ To encourage treatment and disp
Page 106 and 107:
9.0 Implementation status of the Ba
Page 108 and 109:
(iii) (iv) Disposal of DNOC at Ceme
Page 110 and 111:
(i) (ii) (vii) Management of hazard
Page 112 and 113:
BRIEF HISTORY INTERNATIONAL CODE OF
Page 114 and 115:
CTD B)Defficient Laws and Regulatio
Page 116 and 117:
2025. Examples of broader goals emb
Page 118 and 119:
particular focus on food security n
Page 120 and 121:
spraying with pesticides, including
Page 122 and 123:
4.2 How do the MDGs link to Pestici
Page 124 and 125:
• Impacts on certain populations,
Page 126 and 127:
and sociological issues (“mainstr
Page 128 and 129:
6.3 Non-Income Poverty 6.3.1 Educat
Page 130 and 131:
7.2 Least-Toxic Controls In this ap
Page 132 and 133:
8.2 Rotterdam Convention Article 3:
Page 134 and 135:
coordination. Most important some C
Page 136 and 137:
Introduction PESTICIDE AND POVERTY:
Page 138 and 139:
Registration and Control • Respon
Page 140 and 141:
THE ASP AND CIVIL SOCIETY • The A
Page 142 and 143:
Coordination of NGOs • Use existi
Page 144 and 145:
How International Agreements Can Pr
Page 146 and 147:
4. Implementing the Codes & Convent
Page 148 and 149:
CPAM MONITORING TOOLS 1. Community
Page 150 and 151:
AGENDA Experience • Visits the vi
Page 152 and 153:
DESIGNING AN ECOLOGICAL MONITORING
Page 154:
PESTICIDES AND POVERTY CASE STUDIES
show all

Tanzania Multi Stakeholder Map - WebNG

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?