Tanzania Multi Stakeholder Map - WebNG

More documents

Recommendations

Info

e legally binding which is not possible. Visibly it seems voluntary but in real life it is not voluntary. It has assisted developing countries, which did not have institutional framework for controlling the use of pesticides and other chemicals. It was voluntary but did a great job and brought responsibility to other players such as industries and marketing companies. A sense of voluntarism is a good thing in a sense that there will be commitment from parties. 3.3 THEME III: LINK OF CONVENTIONS TO NATIONAL PRIORITIES 3.3.1 Mainstreaming of Chemical Conventions in the Implementation of National Poverty Reduction Strategies Prof. J. H.Y. Katima and Ms. Saada Juma- AGENDA The presentation started by highlighting poverty levels in <strong>Tanzania</strong> and that it is highest among household, which depend on agriculture. Initiatives to address the poverty problem undertaken include: structural adjustment programmes; Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRS), which was linked to debt relief under the enhanced High Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative; National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) (MKUKUTA), which was designed using “outcomes-approach”. These are guided by the National Vision 2025. Currently there is also Mini-Tiger initiative, which is aimed at emulating the successes of the Asian Tigers. Internationally there is the Millennium Development Goals (WSSD 2002), which reinforces the aspirations of the NSGRP. From that point it could be seen that there is strong linkage between the NSGRP, MDGs and the Vision 2025. The presenters elaborated on broader goals of development which are protection of human health; economic benefits of a cleaner environment for attracting investment within the country; fostering sustainable agriculture for the internal market and complying with agricultural and other export requirements for external markets; and contribution that the sound management of chemicals can make to reinforce the legislative and policy framework of a country. The NSGRP, MDGs and the Vision 2025 may provide indication on how chemical safety in general and pesticide use in particular might be linked to the general development picture. Challenges for linking pesticide use and NSGRP, vision 2025 and MDGS are The NSGRP, Vision 2025 and MDGs are very general and overriding. National chemical safety or pesticide use and control planners tend to look at their activities in isolation and not identifying synergies with other areas of chemical safety or pesticide use and control. Also, national sector planners or politicians tend to look at one sector at a time and miss that chemical safety issues occur 15
over a broad range of sectors, having a combined impact far beyond the impact for any one sector. Challenges may be reduced by integral implementation of the NSGRP, Vision 2025 and MDG Goals by mainstreaming their implementation in national action plan for economic development. It is repeated in world fora, that donors are not providing financial assistance for chemical safety because this is not seen as a priority to recipient countries. This is attributed to the fact that chemicals safety is not integrated in requests for development assistance. The presenter recommended that there is a need for capacity building with the following key elements: Ownership involving stakeholders from the beginning; Integration and taking full account of ongoing actions; Cross-sectoral harmonization between donors and recipients; Increased use of modern technology and communication; and Development of new forms of cooperation such as decentralized cooperation among local authorities. It was further recommended that activities addressing chemical safety should be mainstreamed more readily with ongoing development assistance programmes and projects. After presentation of all papers of theme two, there was a general panel discussion which involved the following; One participant asked that we have one project linking three acts of PPA, EMA and Chemicals & Consumer products, therefore three players coordinating one project, how will the implementation be then. The reaction was that in government system there is no conflict, there is partition for facilitation. The aim of this project is to find linkages in effective implementation of chemical conventions and these Acts. It was commended that this project will help build capacity to the implementers of the Conventions and the Acts for proper implementation of the Acts and Conventions. The project’s first activity was stakeholders’ mapping to see how we can work with different stakeholders with different responsibilities and to assess synergies that can be used in proper implementation of Chemical Conventions. Under POPs Convention, there is a requirement to prepare the NIP. <strong>Stakeholder</strong>s should look at what they can offer for an efficient implementation of the NIP, consequently the Convention within the specified timelines. There was a general challenge that linkage between poverty and environment shows that poor people are mostly affected but also are the source of pollution due to the fact that they can afford cheap technologies, chemicals, objects which are near to their expiry dates, and crude methods. It was asked that lack of enough incinerators lead to open burning of materials and chemicals. What are the government initiatives to address the problem generation of dioxins and furans from open burning and the incinerators we have which are not very effective according to the studies already conducted, and the reaction was that before permit for construction of incinerators, there must be some consideration to be made which include its size and it should be located in 16
Page 1 and 2: PESTICIDES AND POVERTY Implementing
Page 3 and 4: 3.4 THEME IV: PROJECT DETAILS......
Page 5 and 6: MoH Ministry of Health MT Metric To
Page 7 and 8: Initially, she gave a brief history
Page 9 and 10: iii. Rotterdam Convention - Mr. A.
Page 11 and 12: this project are aware of this trai
Page 13 and 14: On in implementation part the prese
Page 15 and 16: to that effect, however, EMA requir
Page 17 and 18: decision to prohibit transboundary
Page 19: Mr. Akhabuhaya - Registrar of Pesti
Page 23 and 24: laws, approved codes of conduct, et
Page 25 and 26: work plan preparation, there is a n
Page 27 and 28: After the presentation it was asked
Page 29 and 30: 4.0 GROUP WORK AND PRESENTATIONS 4.
Page 31 and 32: 2.2. Training individuals with trai
Page 33 and 34: 4.4 To introduce and promote new st
Page 35 and 36: 7.1. Identify effective ways to pro
Page 37 and 38: 8.1. Production and dissemination o
Page 39 and 40: GROUP 1 PROVISION OF INPUTS TO THE
Page 41 and 42: - misuse of pesticides as obstacle
Page 43 and 44: • Mapping of supply chain for pes
Page 45 and 46: 6.0. CLOSING REMARKS The closing re
Page 47 and 48: APPENDIX I WORKSHOP PROGRAMME 42
Page 49 and 50: 17.00 End Day 1 Day 2: Thursday 4 t
Page 51 and 52: APPENDIX II LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 46
Page 53 and 54: 7 Dr. Enock Masanja University of D
Page 55: 18 Dr. Ruth Minja Tanzania Associat
Page 58 and 59: Pesticides and Poverty Implementing
Page 60 and 61: Activity 6 - CASE STUDIES - Documen
Page 62 and 63: CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ST
Page 64 and 65: In recent decades, the risks posed
Page 66 and 67: exemptions granted should minimize
Page 68 and 69: c) Report to the Conference of the
Page 70 and 71:
and dissemination of available alte
Page 72 and 73:
The issue of management of POPs fal
Page 74 and 75:
Table 1: List of stakeholders and t
Page 76 and 77:
Institution xxiv) TANESCO xxv) Seed
Page 78 and 79:
5.0 CHALLENGES AND PLANNED EFFORTS
Page 80 and 81:
5.2 Planned Efforts Some of the pla
Page 82 and 83:
7.0 CONCLUDING REMARKS The Stockhol
Page 84 and 85:
Reviews notifications from parties
Page 86 and 87:
4.3 Roles of stakeholders: Provisio
Page 88 and 89:
provides early warning for developi
Page 90 and 91:
TABLE 1: CHEMICALS SUBJECT TO THE P
Page 92 and 93:
Chemical Category Registration Stat
Page 94 and 95:
PAPER ON BASEL AND BAMAKO CONVENTIO
Page 96 and 97:
1.0 Introduction 1.1 History of the
Page 98 and 99:
⇒ The prevention and monitoring o
Page 100 and 101:
need to be disposed of. Hence trans
Page 102 and 103:
(i) Ban amendment (1995) During its
Page 104 and 105:
⇒ To encourage treatment and disp
Page 106 and 107:
9.0 Implementation status of the Ba
Page 108 and 109:
(iii) (iv) Disposal of DNOC at Ceme
Page 110 and 111:
(i) (ii) (vii) Management of hazard
Page 112 and 113:
BRIEF HISTORY INTERNATIONAL CODE OF
Page 114 and 115:
CTD B)Defficient Laws and Regulatio
Page 116 and 117:
2025. Examples of broader goals emb
Page 118 and 119:
particular focus on food security n
Page 120 and 121:
spraying with pesticides, including
Page 122 and 123:
4.2 How do the MDGs link to Pestici
Page 124 and 125:
• Impacts on certain populations,
Page 126 and 127:
and sociological issues (“mainstr
Page 128 and 129:
6.3 Non-Income Poverty 6.3.1 Educat
Page 130 and 131:
7.2 Least-Toxic Controls In this ap
Page 132 and 133:
8.2 Rotterdam Convention Article 3:
Page 134 and 135:
coordination. Most important some C
Page 136 and 137:
Introduction PESTICIDE AND POVERTY:
Page 138 and 139:
Registration and Control • Respon
Page 140 and 141:
THE ASP AND CIVIL SOCIETY • The A
Page 142 and 143:
Coordination of NGOs • Use existi
Page 144 and 145:
How International Agreements Can Pr
Page 146 and 147:
4. Implementing the Codes & Convent
Page 148 and 149:
CPAM MONITORING TOOLS 1. Community
Page 150 and 151:
AGENDA Experience • Visits the vi
Page 152 and 153:
DESIGNING AN ECOLOGICAL MONITORING
Page 154:
PESTICIDES AND POVERTY CASE STUDIES
show all

Tanzania Multi Stakeholder Map - WebNG

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?