Tanzania Multi Stakeholder Map - WebNG

More documents

Recommendations

Info

DESIGNING AN ECOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAMME Cont’d • The ecology of the area - identification of affected species - ecological importance (keystone, significant, less significant), population status (i.e. endemic, rare, or protected), cultural importance (Flagship, valued, not significant to any cultural group), Economic importance (Imperative, High, Moderate, Low) • The ecotoxicology of the pesticide in the same or similar type of environments – background ecotoxicology studies • The magnitude of exposure - dose/rate, duration, timing 7 8 Factors for consideration in assessing the need to monitor potential tial impacts on wildlife Population Status Ecological Cultural Economic Potential importance Importance Importance Impact Critically endangered facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild in the immediate future Endangered facing high risk of extinction in the wild in the near future Vulnerable likely to move into endangered category in the medium term future Near – threatened close to qualifying as vulnerable Rare not at present vulnerable, but with small world populations, therefore at risk Unthreatened, at no risk of extension in the medium term Keystone species important to the ecology of many other species OR crucial to key eco processes Significant, important to a number of other species OR to eco functions Unimportant, less significant to species composition of habitat & to ecological functions Unknown Flagship - species which are well known & of high cultural values Valuedimportant to some aspects of human culture Unimportant – of no significance to any major group Imperative High Moderate Low Extinction Population decline Adult deaths, Immature Deaths, Breeding Failure Health impairment, Growth retarded Physiological charge, Behavioural change Risk of acute toxicity: 0 = No risk, + = Low risk, ++ = Moderate risk, +++ = High risk, ? = Unknown risks Pesticide Group Organochlori ne Organophos phate Carbamate Pyrethroid IGR –Insect growth regulator Phenyl pyrazoles Biologicals Herbicide Fungicide Aquatic Invertebra tes + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + 0 - + + 0 - + Amphibians/ Chelonians + + 0 - + + + + - + + + + + + 0 ++ + 0 + - + + + + - + + Fish + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + 0 0 - + + + + - + + + Soil Processe s + + + + - + + + 0 - + + + + - + + + + - + + + + + - + + + + - + + + - + + + - + + Terrestrial invertebrates + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + - + + + + + - + + + 0 - + + 0 - + + Lizards + + 0 - + + + ? + + - + + + 0? + + + 0 0 - + + ? Birds + - + + + - + + + 0 - + + + 0 - + 0 0 - + + + 0 0 - + 0 - + + Mammals + + + - + + + + - + + + + 0 + + 0 0 - + 0 - + Abundant widespread & common 9 10 Risk by application method Application method Aerial – exhaust Aquati c invert ebrate + + + Amphibian s / Chelonians + + + Fish + + + Soil process es + + Terrestrial invertebrate s + + + Reptile s + + + Birds + + + Mammal s + + + DESIGNING AN ECOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAMME Cont’d Aerial – ULV + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + FORMULATING THE HYPOTHESIS Ground conventional Ground – ULV Fogging Dusting Baiting Granules + + + + + + + 0 - + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Formulate the hypothesis based on knowledge obtained via desk review – it should state the possible (perceived) impact of the pesticide(s). This hypothesis should then be turned ‘upside down’ to produce the ‘null hypothesis’ . Before planning the fieldwork double check your analysis of the problem, this may save you from collecting useless data. Dips/pour-ons + 0 0 + + + + 0 0 - + + 0 - + 11 12 147
PHASE II: IMPLEMENTATION PHASE (FIELD WORK) • Study design & Site Selection : Use assembled maps, operational & biological info to position comparable untreated plots. Consider scale / size, homogenity of habitat, subject of interest i.e species of interest (bioindicators), influence of spraying technique, replication. 13 PHASE III: ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT PHASE •Presentation of results ? Measuring specie abundance (population of a particular species) & richness (number of species) ? Use of ecological yardsticks to determine if significant findings are biologically consequential, acceptable or critical. • Results interpretation & Drawing of conclusions ? Need to have professional advice from experienced Ecotoxicologists 14 THANK YOU 15 148
Page 1 and 2:
PESTICIDES AND POVERTY Implementing
Page 3 and 4:
3.4 THEME IV: PROJECT DETAILS......
Page 5 and 6:
MoH Ministry of Health MT Metric To
Page 7 and 8:
Initially, she gave a brief history
Page 9 and 10:
iii. Rotterdam Convention - Mr. A.
Page 11 and 12:
this project are aware of this trai
Page 13 and 14:
On in implementation part the prese
Page 15 and 16:
to that effect, however, EMA requir
Page 17 and 18:
decision to prohibit transboundary
Page 19 and 20:
Mr. Akhabuhaya - Registrar of Pesti
Page 21 and 22:
over a broad range of sectors, havi
Page 23 and 24:
laws, approved codes of conduct, et
Page 25 and 26:
work plan preparation, there is a n
Page 27 and 28:
After the presentation it was asked
Page 29 and 30:
4.0 GROUP WORK AND PRESENTATIONS 4.
Page 31 and 32:
2.2. Training individuals with trai
Page 33 and 34:
4.4 To introduce and promote new st
Page 35 and 36:
7.1. Identify effective ways to pro
Page 37 and 38:
8.1. Production and dissemination o
Page 39 and 40:
GROUP 1 PROVISION OF INPUTS TO THE
Page 41 and 42:
- misuse of pesticides as obstacle
Page 43 and 44:
• Mapping of supply chain for pes
Page 45 and 46:
6.0. CLOSING REMARKS The closing re
Page 47 and 48:
APPENDIX I WORKSHOP PROGRAMME 42
Page 49 and 50:
17.00 End Day 1 Day 2: Thursday 4 t
Page 51 and 52:
APPENDIX II LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 46
Page 53 and 54:
7 Dr. Enock Masanja University of D
Page 55:
18 Dr. Ruth Minja Tanzania Associat
Page 58 and 59:
Pesticides and Poverty Implementing
Page 60 and 61:
Activity 6 - CASE STUDIES - Documen
Page 62 and 63:
CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ST
Page 64 and 65:
In recent decades, the risks posed
Page 66 and 67:
exemptions granted should minimize
Page 68 and 69:
c) Report to the Conference of the
Page 70 and 71:
and dissemination of available alte
Page 72 and 73:
The issue of management of POPs fal
Page 74 and 75:
Table 1: List of stakeholders and t
Page 76 and 77:
Institution xxiv) TANESCO xxv) Seed
Page 78 and 79:
5.0 CHALLENGES AND PLANNED EFFORTS
Page 80 and 81:
5.2 Planned Efforts Some of the pla
Page 82 and 83:
7.0 CONCLUDING REMARKS The Stockhol
Page 84 and 85:
Reviews notifications from parties
Page 86 and 87:
4.3 Roles of stakeholders: Provisio
Page 88 and 89:
provides early warning for developi
Page 90 and 91:
TABLE 1: CHEMICALS SUBJECT TO THE P
Page 92 and 93:
Chemical Category Registration Stat
Page 94 and 95:
PAPER ON BASEL AND BAMAKO CONVENTIO
Page 96 and 97:
1.0 Introduction 1.1 History of the
Page 98 and 99:
⇒ The prevention and monitoring o
Page 100 and 101:
need to be disposed of. Hence trans
Page 102 and 103: (i) Ban amendment (1995) During its
Page 104 and 105: ⇒ To encourage treatment and disp
Page 106 and 107: 9.0 Implementation status of the Ba
Page 108 and 109: (iii) (iv) Disposal of DNOC at Ceme
Page 110 and 111: (i) (ii) (vii) Management of hazard
Page 112 and 113: BRIEF HISTORY INTERNATIONAL CODE OF
Page 114 and 115: CTD B)Defficient Laws and Regulatio
Page 116 and 117: 2025. Examples of broader goals emb
Page 118 and 119: particular focus on food security n
Page 120 and 121: spraying with pesticides, including
Page 122 and 123: 4.2 How do the MDGs link to Pestici
Page 124 and 125: • Impacts on certain populations,
Page 126 and 127: and sociological issues (“mainstr
Page 128 and 129: 6.3 Non-Income Poverty 6.3.1 Educat
Page 130 and 131: 7.2 Least-Toxic Controls In this ap
Page 132 and 133: 8.2 Rotterdam Convention Article 3:
Page 134 and 135: coordination. Most important some C
Page 136 and 137: Introduction PESTICIDE AND POVERTY:
Page 138 and 139: Registration and Control • Respon
Page 140 and 141: THE ASP AND CIVIL SOCIETY • The A
Page 142 and 143: Coordination of NGOs • Use existi
Page 144 and 145: How International Agreements Can Pr
Page 146 and 147: 4. Implementing the Codes & Convent
Page 148 and 149: CPAM MONITORING TOOLS 1. Community
Page 150 and 151: AGENDA Experience • Visits the vi
Page 154: PESTICIDES AND POVERTY CASE STUDIES
show all

Tanzania Multi Stakeholder Map - WebNG

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?