Tanzania Multi Stakeholder Map - WebNG

More documents

Recommendations

Info

expertise. It was then commended that during carrying out case studies proposition we should not focus on this one project only but we can link it to other projects and activities of other projects that are ongoing and therefore let us open our minds to open other links that will provide funds. Let us bear in mind that the project has timeline and we should make sure that we deliver and meet the obligations of the funders. We should also think on the sustainability of the project after its completion. 3.2 THEME II: INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL CONVENTIONS AND PROCESSES 3.2.1 The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs): Overview and Implementation Status in <strong>Tanzania</strong> Ms. A. E. Madete and Mr. J. Enock -Division of Environment – Vice President’s Office The presentation highlighted that the Stockholm Convention negotiation process started in 1992, during the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro where it was agreed to address the problem of POPs and their associated problems. On May 23, 2001 a global, legally binding instrument called the “Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)” was adopted in Stockholm Sweden. As of June 2005, the Stockholm Convention had 151 signatories and 102 Parties. The Convention entered into force on May 17, 2004. The objectives of the convention are to protect human health and the environment from the adverse effects of POPs, to reduce or eliminate releases from international production and use which is to prohibit or take legal and administrative measures necessary to eliminate the production and use of POPs listed in Annex A, restrict the production and use of DDT for disease vector control in accordance with WHO guidelines, to reduce or eliminate releases from unintentional production of chemicals listed in Annex C (PCBs, Dioxins and Furans and Hexachlorobenzene), to develop and endeavour to implement a plan for the implementation for POPs management. The presenters elaborated on articles 3,4,5,6,7,8, which are specifically focusing on the use of pesticides, which includes stockpiles chemicals, implementations plans, review and update, procedure for adding POPs in the list etc. 7
On in implementation part the presenters reported that currently the POP Pesticides are controlled by the Plant Protection Act (1997) and Plant Protection Regulations (1999). The Plant Protection Act (1997) controls all plant protection substances including POP Pesticides throughout their life cycle. The Plant Protection Regulations (1999) provides for restricted use of pesticides that are highly toxic including those which are controlled by the Rotterdam Convention. Implementation of the Stockholm Convention in <strong>Tanzania</strong> Development of the National Implementation Plan (NIP) for the Stockholm Convention (2005-2020). The NIP is in the final stages of fine-tuning prior to endorsement by stakeholders. Strengthening Regulatory Regime (Enactment of Principal Environmental Legislation) Section 77 of the Environmental Management Act (EMA) (2004) deals with the issues of POPs in detail. The NIP elaborates on roles of different stakeholders. The key stakeholders include Government: Ministries, agencies (policy development and implementation, planning and coordination). Public Sector and Media (training and research) public awareness, and technical backstopping). Private sector (Public-private partnership) NGOs and CBOs (Promoting wider public participation and awareness and advocacy). Local Government Authorities (promoting local level (bottom-up) participation). Farmers and Consumers (participate in the production of food and agricultural produce). Development partners (Provide financial and technical assistance and may assist in planning and implementation of relevant programmes). On the institutional arrangement, The Vice President’s Office is responsible for environment management in the country. The Environmental Management Act (2004) empowers the Director of Environment to prepare and oversee implementation of the National Implementation Plan (NIP) for the Stockholm Convention. National Environment Management Council (NEMC) is responsible for enforcement, compliance. The Environmental Management Act (EMA) (2004) establishes environmental sections in each sector Ministry whose function include to ensure all environmental matters falling under sector Ministry are implemented and submit annual reports on implementation of the NIP. Local Government Authorities: The Environmental Management Act (2004) requires local authorities to mainstream respective parts of the NIP into their policies, legislation, plans and programmes and submit annual reporting to VPO on the implementation progress. Challenges in Implementation of the Stockholm Convention include limited scope of the legislation governing POPs and waste management, there is Weak enforcement of the existing legislation, environmental pollution by POPs chemicals through spillage, improper storage and disposal, and illegal use, there is also very low awareness by the general public on environmental and human health effects when exposed to POPs, inadequate technical and financial 8
Page 1 and 2: PESTICIDES AND POVERTY Implementing
Page 3 and 4: 3.4 THEME IV: PROJECT DETAILS......
Page 5 and 6: MoH Ministry of Health MT Metric To
Page 7 and 8: Initially, she gave a brief history
Page 9 and 10: iii. Rotterdam Convention - Mr. A.
Page 11: this project are aware of this trai
Page 15 and 16: to that effect, however, EMA requir
Page 17 and 18: decision to prohibit transboundary
Page 19 and 20: Mr. Akhabuhaya - Registrar of Pesti
Page 21 and 22: over a broad range of sectors, havi
Page 23 and 24: laws, approved codes of conduct, et
Page 25 and 26: work plan preparation, there is a n
Page 27 and 28: After the presentation it was asked
Page 29 and 30: 4.0 GROUP WORK AND PRESENTATIONS 4.
Page 31 and 32: 2.2. Training individuals with trai
Page 33 and 34: 4.4 To introduce and promote new st
Page 35 and 36: 7.1. Identify effective ways to pro
Page 37 and 38: 8.1. Production and dissemination o
Page 39 and 40: GROUP 1 PROVISION OF INPUTS TO THE
Page 41 and 42: - misuse of pesticides as obstacle
Page 43 and 44: • Mapping of supply chain for pes
Page 45 and 46: 6.0. CLOSING REMARKS The closing re
Page 47 and 48: APPENDIX I WORKSHOP PROGRAMME 42
Page 49 and 50: 17.00 End Day 1 Day 2: Thursday 4 t
Page 51 and 52: APPENDIX II LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 46
Page 53 and 54: 7 Dr. Enock Masanja University of D
Page 55: 18 Dr. Ruth Minja Tanzania Associat
Page 58 and 59: Pesticides and Poverty Implementing
Page 60 and 61: Activity 6 - CASE STUDIES - Documen
Page 62 and 63:
CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ST
Page 64 and 65:
In recent decades, the risks posed
Page 66 and 67:
exemptions granted should minimize
Page 68 and 69:
c) Report to the Conference of the
Page 70 and 71:
and dissemination of available alte
Page 72 and 73:
The issue of management of POPs fal
Page 74 and 75:
Table 1: List of stakeholders and t
Page 76 and 77:
Institution xxiv) TANESCO xxv) Seed
Page 78 and 79:
5.0 CHALLENGES AND PLANNED EFFORTS
Page 80 and 81:
5.2 Planned Efforts Some of the pla
Page 82 and 83:
7.0 CONCLUDING REMARKS The Stockhol
Page 84 and 85:
Reviews notifications from parties
Page 86 and 87:
4.3 Roles of stakeholders: Provisio
Page 88 and 89:
provides early warning for developi
Page 90 and 91:
TABLE 1: CHEMICALS SUBJECT TO THE P
Page 92 and 93:
Chemical Category Registration Stat
Page 94 and 95:
PAPER ON BASEL AND BAMAKO CONVENTIO
Page 96 and 97:
1.0 Introduction 1.1 History of the
Page 98 and 99:
⇒ The prevention and monitoring o
Page 100 and 101:
need to be disposed of. Hence trans
Page 102 and 103:
(i) Ban amendment (1995) During its
Page 104 and 105:
⇒ To encourage treatment and disp
Page 106 and 107:
9.0 Implementation status of the Ba
Page 108 and 109:
(iii) (iv) Disposal of DNOC at Ceme
Page 110 and 111:
(i) (ii) (vii) Management of hazard
Page 112 and 113:
BRIEF HISTORY INTERNATIONAL CODE OF
Page 114 and 115:
CTD B)Defficient Laws and Regulatio
Page 116 and 117:
2025. Examples of broader goals emb
Page 118 and 119:
particular focus on food security n
Page 120 and 121:
spraying with pesticides, including
Page 122 and 123:
4.2 How do the MDGs link to Pestici
Page 124 and 125:
• Impacts on certain populations,
Page 126 and 127:
and sociological issues (“mainstr
Page 128 and 129:
6.3 Non-Income Poverty 6.3.1 Educat
Page 130 and 131:
7.2 Least-Toxic Controls In this ap
Page 132 and 133:
8.2 Rotterdam Convention Article 3:
Page 134 and 135:
coordination. Most important some C
Page 136 and 137:
Introduction PESTICIDE AND POVERTY:
Page 138 and 139:
Registration and Control • Respon
Page 140 and 141:
THE ASP AND CIVIL SOCIETY • The A
Page 142 and 143:
Coordination of NGOs • Use existi
Page 144 and 145:
How International Agreements Can Pr
Page 146 and 147:
4. Implementing the Codes & Convent
Page 148 and 149:
CPAM MONITORING TOOLS 1. Community
Page 150 and 151:
AGENDA Experience • Visits the vi
Page 152 and 153:
DESIGNING AN ECOLOGICAL MONITORING
Page 154:
PESTICIDES AND POVERTY CASE STUDIES
show all

Tanzania Multi Stakeholder Map - WebNG

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?