12.05.2014 Views

ASIPP Practice Guidelines - Pain Physician

ASIPP Practice Guidelines - Pain Physician

ASIPP Practice Guidelines - Pain Physician

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Manchikanti et al • <strong>ASIPP</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />

30<br />

12%<br />

Children and<br />

adolescents<br />

15%<br />

Adults<br />

27%<br />

Elderly<br />

Fig. 1. Estimated average of age related prevalence of<br />

low back pain<br />

Reproduced with permission from Manchikanti (103)<br />

pain intensity with moderate or severe disability, whereas<br />

an additional 12% suffer with high pain intensity but with<br />

a low disability. In a similar study, Cote et al (119, 120),<br />

evaluating neck pain and its related disability, reported that<br />

overall, 39% of the sample experienced grade I neck pain,<br />

whereas 9% experienced grade II neck pain, and 5% had<br />

grade III and IV neck pain (Table 2). Almost 16% of the<br />

respondents reported having previously injured the neck<br />

in a motor vehicle collision (119, 120).<br />

Duration of back pain and its chronicity have been a topic<br />

of controversy. It is believed that most of these episodes<br />

will be short-lived, with 80% to 90% of attacks resolving<br />

in about 6 weeks irrespective of the administration or type<br />

of treatment; and 5% to 10% of patients developing persistent<br />

back pain (121, 122). However, this concept has<br />

been questioned, as the condition tends to relapse, so most<br />

patients will experience multiple episodes. As shown in<br />

Table 3, prevalence of low back pain ranged from 35% to<br />

79% at 3 months and 35% to 75% at 12 months (123-127).<br />

The studies evaluating the chronicity of low back pain estimated<br />

the average of age related prevalence of persistent<br />

low back pain as 12% in children and adolescents, 15% in<br />

adults, and 27% in the elderly (Fig. 1). Bressler and colleagues<br />

(101), in a systematic review of the literature determined<br />

that overall prevalence of low back pain in the<br />

elderly was 27% derived from a total elderly population<br />

base of 17,173 with reports from 12 studies from community<br />

population, primary care settings and from the nursing<br />

homes with prevalence ranging from 13% to 51% (101,<br />

109, 128-138).<br />

Chronic <strong>Pain</strong> vs Chronic <strong>Pain</strong> Syndrome<br />

Two major and controversial terms in today’s pain medicine<br />

are “chronic pain,” also known as persistent pain, and<br />

a second category known as “chronic pain syndrome,”<br />

which is a separate and distinct condition (139-142).<br />

Chronic pain or persistent pain persists beyond the expected<br />

healing time of an injury or an illness, usually considered<br />

beyond 6 months. Chronic pain may be associated with<br />

psychological problems such as depression, generalized<br />

anxiety disorder, and some behavioral problems. However,<br />

chronic pain improperly diagnosed or inadequately<br />

treated can result in deteriorating coping skills and limitations<br />

and reduction in functional capacity. In contrast,<br />

chronic pain syndrome is a complex condition with physical,<br />

psychological, emotional, and social components (141,<br />

142). Both chronic pain and chronic pain syndrome can<br />

be defined in terms of duration and persistence of the sensation<br />

of pain, and presence or absence of psychological<br />

and emotional components. However, chronic pain syndrome,<br />

as opposed to chronic pain, has the added component<br />

of certain recognizable psychological and socioeconomic<br />

influences, with characteristic psychological and<br />

sociological behavior patterns inherent in chronic pain syndrome<br />

that distinguish the two conditions (141). According<br />

to the fifth edition of Guides to Evaluation of Permanent<br />

Impairment published in 2000 (142), the term chronic<br />

pain syndrome even though not official nomenclature, is<br />

frequently used to describe an individual who is markedly<br />

impaired by chronic pain with substantial psychological<br />

overlay. The guides (142) also state that chronic pain syndrome<br />

is largely a behavioral syndrome that affects a minority<br />

of those with chronic pain. It may best be understood<br />

as a form of an abnormal illness behavior that consists<br />

mainly of excessive adoption of the sick role. The<br />

guides also caution that while the term is useful in certain<br />

situations, it does not, however, substitute for a careful diagnosis<br />

of physiologic, psychological, and conditioning<br />

components that comprise the syndrome. The term chronic<br />

pain syndrome must be used with caution, as grouping pain<br />

problems together under a general disorder may mask and<br />

leave untreated important physiologic differences (142).<br />

Thus, chronic pain may exist in the absence of chronic<br />

pain syndrome, but chronic pain syndrome always presumes<br />

the presence of chronic pain. The terminology recommended<br />

by IASP has eliminated chronic pain syndrome<br />

from the glossary (140). The IASP Task Force on Taxonomy<br />

on classification of chronic pain describing definitions<br />

of pain terms described that it is common in North<br />

America to find patients as having “chronic pain syndrome”<br />

(140). In this case, the Task Force believed that the words<br />

<strong>Pain</strong> <strong>Physician</strong> Vol. 4, No. 1, 2001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!