12.05.2014 Views

Tuvalu Island Courts Bench Book - Federal Court of Australia

Tuvalu Island Courts Bench Book - Federal Court of Australia

Tuvalu Island Courts Bench Book - Federal Court of Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.1 The Tort <strong>of</strong> Negligence<br />

The most common type <strong>of</strong> tort is negligence. As a tort, negligence is defined as the defendant’s<br />

breach <strong>of</strong> their legal duty to take care <strong>of</strong> the plaintiff, either by:<br />

• doing an action which causes harm to the plaintiff; or<br />

• failing do something which prevents harm to the plaintiff.<br />

In order to determine whether the tort <strong>of</strong> negligence exists, three elements must be presen:.<br />

1 The first element is that the defendant must owe the plaintiff a duty <strong>of</strong> care.<br />

2 The second element is that the defendant must breach the duty <strong>of</strong> care that he or she owes<br />

to the plaintiff.<br />

3 The third element is that the plaintiff must suffer damage or harm as a result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

defendant’s breach <strong>of</strong> the duty <strong>of</strong> care.<br />

1. Duty <strong>of</strong> care<br />

The test for whether there is a duty <strong>of</strong> care is whether a person can reasonably foresee that his or<br />

her behaviour will cause damage or harm to someone.<br />

If the answer is yes, then a duty <strong>of</strong> care exists towards that person or other people who fall in the<br />

same category as that person.<br />

Example:<br />

A driver <strong>of</strong> a vehicle would have a duty to take care for other vehicle users, people walking on<br />

the road, and children playing near the road not to hit those people with their vehicle.<br />

2. Breach <strong>of</strong> the duty <strong>of</strong> care<br />

In determining whether there has been a breach <strong>of</strong> a duty <strong>of</strong> care, you must ask:<br />

• “Would a reasonable person recognise that their actions (or failure to act) may cause<br />

some damage and therefore take care to avoid doing (or not doing) it?”; and<br />

• “Did the defendant fail to take the precautions a reasonable person would in the<br />

circumstances?”<br />

It is important to remember that:<br />

• the greater the potential harm to someone, the greater the precautions that are required;<br />

and<br />

• it is not necessary that a reasonable person would foresee the exact type or the<br />

seriousness <strong>of</strong> the damage. It is enough that they recognise the risk that some damage<br />

may occur as a result <strong>of</strong> their actions (or failure to act).<br />

<strong>Tuvalu</strong> <strong>Island</strong> <strong><strong>Court</strong>s</strong> <strong>Bench</strong> <strong>Book</strong> June 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!