Fiji Magistrates Bench Book - Federal Court of Australia

Identification
In Court, the prosecution should identify the person charged by
clearly pointing out that person in Court.
The prosecution must provide evidence to prove that it was the
defendant who falsely pretended.
False pretence
False pretence is defined in the Penal Code as any “representation
made by words, writing or conduct, of a matter of fact, either past or
present, which representation is false in fact, and which the person
making it knows it to be false, or does not believe to be true”: s308
Penal Code.
Intent to defraud
See general rules on intent in s9 of the Penal Code.
The intent to defraud may be inferred from the facts of the case.
A fraud is complete once a false statement is made by a defendant
who knows the statement is false and the victim parts with his or her
property on the basis of that statement: See Denning [1962]
NSWLR 175.
Use or benefit of
The prosecution must show that the defendant took the property for
him or herself or for someone else.
Induces any other person
The false pretence must induce the victim to part with his or her
property.
Case law
See Panjubol v DPP [1985] SILR 122,
Fred Reynolds v R [1986] Fj Cr App. 26/86.
Defences
If the prosecution has proved the elements of the offence, beyond
reasonable doubt, the defendant may still have a legal defence. The
defendant will have to establish any defence to your satisfaction, on
the balance of probabilities (i.e. more likely than not).
Sentence
Maximum five years imprisonment.
Fiji Magistrates Bench Book April 2004