11.05.2014 Views

Biology And Management Of White-tailed Deer In Alabama

Biology And Management Of White-tailed Deer In Alabama

Biology And Management Of White-tailed Deer In Alabama

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Deer</strong> populations respond to varying mortality rates by decreasing,<br />

increasing, or remaining stable. A deer herd will continue to grow<br />

with annual mortality rates of less than 35 percent. The rate of growth<br />

will depend on how far below 35 percent the annual mortality rate actually<br />

is. For example, an annual mortality rate of 20 percent allows<br />

for rapid population growth while at 30 percent, population growth may<br />

be more gradual. With approximately 35 percent annual mortality, a<br />

population will generally remain stable. With a 40 percent annual<br />

mortality rate, the total population will decline; at rates greater than<br />

40 percent this decline becomes more pronounced. The effect annual<br />

mortality has on a population also depends on how the population is<br />

structured with respect to adult sex ratio and on how the annual mortality<br />

is distributed between both sexes. Reproductive output and<br />

recruitment also influences the net effect of annual mortality rates.<br />

Population models have shown deer herds produce the greatest<br />

sustained yields when maintained at approximately 40 to 80 percent of<br />

the estimated carrying capacity (Downing and Guynn 1985). At these<br />

herd densities, the highest harvest rates may be achieved without compromising<br />

habitat integrity. Reproduction and recruitment will exceed<br />

natural mortality significantly at these levels, thereby providing the<br />

optimum range for a sustained annual harvest of deer. Studies have<br />

shown peak harvest rates are achieved at deer densities of 50 to 60<br />

percent of carrying capacity (Downing and Guynn 1985). At this level,<br />

allocation of resources in habitat and fawn production/recruitment is<br />

maximized. All deer in the herd will develop to the potential of the<br />

habitat’s nutritional ceiling. <strong>In</strong> areas of suboptimal habitats with inherently<br />

lower carrying capacities, this level may be too low to provide<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!