11.05.2014 Views

A Study of Microcontrollers in Finnish Comprehensive Schools - Oulu

A Study of Microcontrollers in Finnish Comprehensive Schools - Oulu

A Study of Microcontrollers in Finnish Comprehensive Schools - Oulu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Journal <strong>of</strong> Technology Education Vol. 18 No. 2, Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2007<br />

Figure 2. The project board be<strong>in</strong>g assembled<br />

(right).<br />

(left) and be<strong>in</strong>g tested<br />

<strong>Study</strong> Participants<br />

Twelve comprehensive (primary and secondary) school classes <strong>of</strong> grades 5-<br />

8 (ages 11-14 years) participated <strong>in</strong> the study. The number <strong>of</strong> children <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

was 230. The participat<strong>in</strong>g schools were located <strong>in</strong> <strong>Oulu</strong> Prov<strong>in</strong>ce: Järvikylä<br />

School <strong>in</strong> Nivala, Oksava and Mart<strong>in</strong>mäki <strong>Schools</strong> <strong>in</strong> Haapajärvi, Vattukylä,<br />

Hyttikallio and Karhukangas <strong>Schools</strong> <strong>in</strong> Haapavesi, Ruukki School <strong>in</strong> Ruukki,<br />

Kestilä Central School <strong>in</strong> Kestilä, Matkaniva and Petäjäskoski <strong>Schools</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

Oula<strong>in</strong>en, L<strong>in</strong>tulampi School <strong>in</strong> <strong>Oulu</strong> and Kärsämäki Central School <strong>in</strong><br />

Kärsämäki. All the participat<strong>in</strong>g schools were state schools, which is the<br />

predom<strong>in</strong>ant comprehensive school system <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land.<br />

Data collection<br />

True to the qualitative data collection methods, multiple data sources and<br />

strategies were employed, apply<strong>in</strong>g the concept <strong>of</strong> triangulation (Miles &<br />

Hubermann, 1994: 266). Data were collected <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g ways: Pictures<br />

taken <strong>of</strong> the children work<strong>in</strong>g while mak<strong>in</strong>g the Picaxe applications, teacher’s<br />

written reports, researcher’s notes <strong>of</strong> the process and applications, children’s<br />

written and drawn sketches <strong>of</strong> their applications, photographs and video clips <strong>of</strong><br />

the children’s f<strong>in</strong>al outcomes, as well as <strong>in</strong>terviews <strong>of</strong> children documented on<br />

video record<strong>in</strong>gs. The <strong>in</strong>terviews were carried out <strong>in</strong> authentic situations where<br />

children expla<strong>in</strong>ed their applications. The questions asked from the children<br />

emerged spontaneously from the situation. Thus, the <strong>in</strong>terviews were not prestructured<br />

and, consequently, there was no “standard” time that they lasted<br />

either. Moreover, not every child was <strong>in</strong>terviewed. Some <strong>of</strong> the children’s<br />

applications called for more explanation than others. For example if the teacher<br />

told the researchers that not all the essential <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>of</strong> the child’s<br />

application were to be found <strong>in</strong> the sketches, draw<strong>in</strong>gs, etc., an <strong>in</strong>terview session<br />

was arranged to deepen the understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> what the child had actually done<br />

and accomplished.<br />

-40-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!