Best Practices for Project Management, Design, and Construction of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Organization and Approach On small projects the amount of equipment and anchorage details may be limited enough for direct reference of plan-noted equipment to the detail drawings. On larger or more complex projects, it is recommended that significant equipment be listed in a table or chart with detail references, equipment, descriptions, and OSHPD pre-approval numbers provided for each appropriate item. The sample equipment schedule in the Appendix identifies the minimum amount of information needed for review. Additional information may include room locations, manufacturer’s name and model numbers, responsibilities for supply and installation, and utility connection information. Since anchorage details are specific to products and even particular manufacturers, a numbering system, either provided by the owner or created for the project, is important for tracking equipment and changes throughout the construction. When any object needs to be bolted to the floor, the owner should be asking questions about cleaning, maintenance access, etc. EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE EQUIP NO. DESCRIPTION MANUF. ATTACHED TO EQUIPMENT PROPERTIES WT W D H DETAIL NO. OSHPD PRE-APPROVAL (OSHPD Best Practices) Page 40 DRAFT FINAL, Sept. 2011
Drawing Content Equipment may include medical, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, food service, or accessory items such as shelving and appliances. Equipment may be installed by the contractor, the owner, or special vendors. Regardless of who performs the installation, for the purposes of construction, all items need information on the drawings to describe their installation. Anchorage of standard items, such as ceilings and casework, is best covered in the drawings by typical details. These may include typical backing-plate requirements for wall framing and clip attachments to walls, counters, and floors for miscellaneous items found throughout the project in toilets, kitchens, treatment and exam rooms, etc. Drawings may also cover the anchorage of items exempt from plan review (discussed in the preceding section). However, such details are subject to plan review, and changes from the approved drawings may generate a post approval document review. For those pieces of equipment that exceed the criteria for exemptions, specific details designed by the EOR or provided by the manufacturer's (California-registered) engineer are required on the drawings. Some manufacturers have engineered anchorage systems that have been submitted to OSHPD under its Anchorage Pre-Approval Program. Pre-approval is for anchorage only and does not include product approval. This program allows the use of drawings for equipment anchorage, in most cases, to show just the pre-approval number. However, in some cases, the actual details submitted by the manufacturer should be reproduced on the drawings for the reviewer to verify that the anchorage design is correctly applied to the project. If this is required, it will be stated in the pre-approval documents. The list of pre-approved anchorage for equipment is maintained by OSHPD and provided on its Website for use by design professionals. If a pre-approved product or system is specified, it is vital that the design team review the actual pro-approval documents to confirm that they conform to the project requirements. The acceptability of proprietary fastening systems should be confirmed with OSHPD. For attachment to concrete, Title 24 covers expansion-type and adhesive-type anchor systems. Other types of fasteners are subject to OSHPD approval. The use of some fasteners, such as shot pins and screw-type anchors, is limited by OSHPD FDD. Additional information in the form of CANs is available on the OSHPD Website. When equipment cannot be specified at the time of submittal, the design team may request that the item be deferred. Deferred items are to be listed in a schedule on the cover sheet of the drawings. However, assumptions should be made for equipment weights, location, and utility connections to allow the reviewers to check related items (such as the supporting structural framing) and to permit tracking of follow-up Amended Construction Documents for anchorage details. The drawings and specifications must fully describe the performance and loading criteria for the deferred item. (OSHPD Best Practices) Page 41 DRAFT FINAL, Sept. 2011
Page 1 and 2: [On inside Title Page: Many of the
Page 3 and 4: • Part 1 of Title 24 is the Calif
Page 5 and 6: Rapid Review Unit The Rapid Review
Page 7 and 8: Section 2: Geologic Hazards Investi
Page 9 and 10: equested, CGS will review the suppl
Page 11 and 12: under OSHPD regulations. Please see
Page 13 and 14: Another approach to creating better
Page 15 and 16: create confusion. The discipline ha
Page 17 and 18: applicable phasing must be clearly
Page 19 and 20: addresses, and project Websites, ma
Page 21 and 22: • Plumbing fixture counts for pub
Page 23 and 24: (OSHPD Best Practices) Page 23 DRAF
Page 25 and 26: • Treatment of listed floor slab
Page 27 and 28: • References to the prescriptive
Page 29 and 30: Provisions of California Fire Code
Page 31 and 32: Existing Special Conditions The sam
Page 33 and 34: Enlarged Drawings Provide enlarged
Page 35 and 36: 3.6 Door Schedule Purpose The door
Page 37 and 38: Existing or Special Conditions Exis
Page 39: approved “shake table testing.”
Page 43 and 44: Drawing Content For details that pr
Page 45 and 46: Details that provide information on
Page 47 and 48: Early in the design process, it is
Page 49 and 50: • Identify any equipment that req
Page 51 and 52: • Identify any equipment that req
Page 53 and 54: Several drawings contain essential
Page 55 and 56: o o o o o o o o Floor Plan - Lighti
Page 57 and 58: Section 4: Inspector of Record Best
Page 59 and 60: • Approved program flexes; • Ra
Page 61 and 62: 9. The IOR shall submit verified co
Page 63 and 64: • Log and record areas that by de
Page 65 and 66: • Inspections completed by the us
Page 67 and 68: Logging Inspection Requests 1. When
Page 69 and 70: Preconstruction Meetings A preconst
Page 71 and 72: • Explain code requirements for s
Page 73 and 74: Concluding Remarks An IOR needs to
Page 75 and 76: Although including the TIO Program
Page 77 and 78: Owner The Owner is responsible for
Page 79 and 80: Inspections The TIO Program should
Page 81 and 82: The construction of hospitals in Ca
Page 83 and 84: Instruction Bulletins (IBs), prepar
Page 85 and 86: Changes will undoubtedly be require
Page 87 and 88: Proper execution of these and the o
Page 89 and 90: contingencies, that concur with def
Page 91 and 92:
and help in determining the cause o
Page 93 and 94:
have discovered that bids only cove
Page 95 and 96:
Best Practice 7: Determine whether
Page 97 and 98:
OSHPD believes the key to receiving
Page 99 and 100:
the design assistance from the manu
Page 101 and 102:
Permit Phase Best Practice 15: Keep
Page 103 and 104:
Comment and Process Review The deci
Page 105 and 106:
See Section 4 of this volume for a
Page 107 and 108:
• OSHPD shall schedule a final st
Page 109 and 110:
CPC CPR DD Deferred Submittals DSE
Page 111:
(OSHPD Best Practices) Page 111 DRA
show all

Best Practices for Project Management, Design, and Construction of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?