Download Report - Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences

eing conducted at the Warner Bros' studio, I take
pleasure in stating that the demonstrations are progressing
with remarkable success, and the spirit of
co-operation and genuine interest has developed beyond
anything anticipated.
The General Electric Company, through its variows
organizations, has contributed lamps {or special
tests to the amount of $4,500 in cost, and has sent
four of its most outstanding representatives in this
department of electrical illumination to participate.
The Society of Motion Picture Engineers, which
will hold its semi-annual convention in the headquarters
of the Academy the week o{ April 9 to 14,
1928, will be represented by several of its members
at the final week of incandescent demonstrations.
Keese Engineering Company, through its manager,
J. T. Shannon, has contributed for experiment
in the demonstrations a new Cooper-Hewitt red
tube lamp developed by the company to be used in
conjunction with its blue-white tubes.
The Make-Up Artists' Association is co-operating
in experiments with make-up.
Max Factor, make-up manufacturer, is contributing
a make-up artist and material for constant use
during both the day and night demonstrations.
Mole-Richardson, Inc., manufacturers o{ equipment,
have contributed their entire supply of equipment
to the demonstrations and are actively developing
new models as required.
The Eastman Company, the Agfa Company and
the Dupont Company are contributing all the necessary
negative free of charge.
The developing laboratories are doing the developing
of negative and printing of positive prints
free o{ charge.
The Jacobsmeyer Co. is printing titles for the
test shots free of charge.
The Association of Motion Picture Producers is
furnishing the funds for the payment o{ labor and
extra. people and such other incidental expenses as
may De necessafy.
The American Society of Cinematographers,
working in co-operalion v'ith the Academy, has undertaken
the direct management of the demonstrations
and is doing splendid work. The demonstrations
are being attended by an average of 150 cameramen
on each Friday and Wednesday night, and
by many other technicians and persons interested.
The special committee appointed by the Academy
in charge of demonstrations, headed by Mr, Murphy
o{ Warner Bros., has been working six days a
week, eight hours a day, and also two nights in each
week, until one or two o'clock in the morning, constantly
engaged in conducting and promoting these
demonstrations.
QUESTIONNAIRES TO STUDIOS
For the purpose o{ ascertaining studio conditions
and the results of their operations with relation to
the use of incandescent illumination, for the information
of the industry and the Academy Committees
having in charge investigation of the subject, the
Secretary of the Academy sent to each studio operating
in Hollywood and vicinity two questionnaires,
one dated January 5, when the enquiries were commencing,
and the second, dated March 22, when the
investigations had been in active progress {or more
than two months.
Replies to these two questionnaires were received
promptly from all studios. Answers to the first
questionnaire revealed that only five studios had
been operating with incandescent illumination to a
sufficient extent to justify replies based on extended
experience. Five other studios, however, reported
the results of partial experiments and investigations.
Replies to the second questionnaire showed that
nine studios had operated in actual production, an
increase in two months of 80 per cent.
Following are enquiries made in the two questionnaires:
QUESTIONNAIRE No. l.
1. Labor cost of electric operation by incandescent
lights as compared with what hard lighting
would have been, giving figures,
tel
2. Cost of current consumption compared in
same way.
3. Expense of replacements, such as globes, etc.,
as compared with hard lighting replacements.
4. Estimates as to how incandescent lighting
speeded up production, as compared to hard lightitrg.
5. Limitations of incandescent lighting, stating
why such limitations exist and if due to insufficient
equipment or to undeveloped improvements.
6. Adaptability of incandescent lighting, as compared
to hard lighting, explaining where soft lighting
can be used to better advantage.
7. What kinds of film were used and comparative
results as to difierent kinds.
QUESTIONNAIRE No. 2.
1. Labor Cost: What have been your electrical
labor costs with incandescent lamps, as compared
to arc lighting since January 11,7928?
2. Current Cost: What has been the relative
cost of electrical current for the two forms of illumination
since January 11 ? I{ this information is
not available, what has been the relative amperages
of incandescent and arc sets of similar size and
character ?
3. Replacements: What has been your experience
since January 11 with regard to the cost of