DOS BULLETIN - Dansk Ortopædisk Selskab
DOS BULLETIN - Dansk Ortopædisk Selskab
DOS BULLETIN - Dansk Ortopædisk Selskab
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2010-378_<strong>DOS</strong> nr. 3 2010 29/09/10 10:08 Side 86<br />
Follow-up after four minor hand surgery operations –<br />
general practitioner or hand clinic?<br />
A randomized prospective study<br />
N. Søe, N. Vendel-Jensen, J. Dahl, B. Cumberland,<br />
L. Munch, S. Jørring<br />
Hand Section in Gentofte, Department of Orthopaedic, Herlev Hospital;<br />
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Operations,<br />
Gentofte Hospital; General Practioner, Region Hovedstaden;<br />
Planned Surgery Ward Z, Gentofte Hospital; Hand Section,<br />
Department of Orthopaedic, Hillerød Hospital<br />
Background: This study was designed to access the safety and effectiveness of<br />
transferring the 3-4 day and 2 weeks postoperative assessment to the general<br />
practioner ( GP) after operation for carpal tunnel syndrome, ganglion cyst, Quervain´s<br />
disease and trigger finger.<br />
Purpose: An increasing number of patients are visiting hand clinics. Postoperative<br />
follow-up after minor hand operations are increasing and can be expensive in<br />
terms of time consuming for patients and transport. If the patients could be transfer<br />
safety and with effectiveness to the general practioner, time could be used otherwise.<br />
Methods: Fifty two patients undergoing one of four hand-operations ( CTR 35 ;<br />
ganglion cyst 8 ; pulley release 9) were randomized on a block basis for the 3-4<br />
day and 2-week postoperative wound inspection and removal of stitches to either<br />
their GP or the hospital outpatient clinic. All patients were reviewed at hospital 6<br />
weeks postoperative when a simple questionnaire was completed. The questionnaire<br />
asked whether a wound infection had been diagnosed and if so, whether any<br />
antibiotics were prescribed . Wrist-TAM, finger-TAM, grip-strength, time consuming<br />
and VAS-pain before and 6 week after operation ,were assessed.<br />
Findings: Two of 29 patients followed up at a GP were considered to be infected<br />
and one patient were prescribed antibiotics. None of the 23 wounds assessed in<br />
the hospital clinic were considered to be infected or having antibiotics . Both<br />
groups had a mean treatment time of 9 minutes ( 3-30 ). VAS pain was reduced<br />
in GP group with 65 % and in clinic group 72 % ( not significant). Preoperative<br />
grip strength were reduced 20 % in both groups. At the 6-week assessment all 52<br />
wounds had healed satisfactorily and none showed any evidence of infection. 6<br />
patients were referred for hand therapy in the GP group and none in the hospital<br />
group. Finger-TAM was reduced 0.8 % in the GP group and increased 0.8 % in<br />
the clinic group.<br />
Conclusion: Patients were assessed safely in the GP group but wound infections<br />
were probably over- diagnosed. Six out of 29 patients were referred to hand therapy<br />
in the GP group and none in the hospital group. VAS pain and grip strength<br />
were the same in both groups.<br />
86