10.05.2014 Views

DOS BULLETIN - Dansk Ortopædisk Selskab

DOS BULLETIN - Dansk Ortopædisk Selskab

DOS BULLETIN - Dansk Ortopædisk Selskab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2010-378_<strong>DOS</strong> nr. 3 2010 29/09/10 10:08 Side 111<br />

Effect of standing position and weight-bearing on<br />

joint space width and pelvic tilt in radiographs of<br />

patients with dysplasia of the hip<br />

Anna Katrine Sundgaard, Maria Grevit, Trine Torfing,<br />

Ole Ovesen, Søren Overgaard<br />

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University<br />

Hospital; Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital<br />

Background: It is generally accepted that the radiographs of the hip are<br />

taken in supine position. It is of interest how radiographic measures differ<br />

in patients with hip dysplasia when changing positioned from supine<br />

to standing knowing that the patient’s functional problem mostly occurs<br />

during weight-bearing.<br />

Purpose: The primary aim of the present study was to determine if<br />

pelvic tilt (represented by the distance between the symphysis and the<br />

sacrococcygeal joint), center edge angle, acetabular index angle, joint<br />

space width, approximated acetabular index of depth to width, femoral<br />

head coverage, posterior wall sign, and cross-over sign differ between<br />

supine and standing weight-bearing position in patients with hip dysplasia.<br />

The secondary aim was to estimate interobserver agreement.<br />

Methods: 23 patients with clinically diagnosed hip dysplasia from the<br />

waiting list for periacetabular osteotomy were included and had supine<br />

and standing weight-bearing standardized anteroposterior pelvic radiographs.<br />

Two readers independently assessed all the radiographs.<br />

Findings: The distance between the symphysis and the sacrococcygeal<br />

joint and center edger angle were reduced in females and males, respectively.<br />

Acetabular index angle increased overall. Minimum joint space<br />

width increased in females. We found no change in acetabular index of<br />

depth to width and femoral head coverage. Posterior wall sign increased<br />

and cross-over sign decreased in the females.<br />

Conclusion: Several of our key-measures changed significantly from<br />

supine to standing position and especially those for evaluation of acetabular<br />

version.Preoperative planning of surgery for reorientation of a retroverted<br />

acetabulum has to be done on both supine and standing weightbearing<br />

radiographs of the pelvis.<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!