LGCDP M&E Framework

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Indicators Indicator Baseline Indicator Target Means of Verification Responsibility Frequency Output 1: Communities and community organizations participate actively in local governance processes (17.0m USD) • Social Mobilization Guidelines drafted No Yes Social Mobilization M&E Section of MLD One-off (04/2009) (2010) Guidelines • DAG mapping by households completed No Yes DAG mapping report M&E Section of MLD One-off (04/2009) (2010) • No. of VCDs covered by social mobilization through LGCDP 0 3,915 LGCDP administrative LGCDP PCU Trimesterly (04/2009) (2012) records • No. of municipalities covered by social mobilization through LGCDP 0 58 LGCDP administrative LGCDP PCU Trimesterly (04/2009) (2012) records • Performance system for social mobilizers in place No Yes Performance system LGCDP PCU One-off (04/2009) (2010) guidelines • % of citizens who say that they are satisfied with the performance of the local social mobilizer Social Mobilizers Performance system LGCDP PCU annually pending design of performance system pending design of performance system • % of citizens from DAG households who say that they are satisfied with the performance of the local social mobilizer pending design of performance system Pending first PM TBD after sample survey Social Mobilizers Performance system LGCDP PCU annually • Number of Ward Citizen’s Committees meetings functional in VDCs and municipalities (at least 2 meetings per year) pending first data collection pending first data collection Administrative data in MLD M&E Section in MLD annually • Number of Integrated Planning Formulation Committees (IPFC) (at least 1 meeting(s) per year) pending first data collection pending first data collection Administrative data in MLD M&E Section in MLD annually • % of 75 DDCs that conduct a Public/community Audit per year pending first data collection • % of 75 DDCs that conduct a Social Audit per year pending first data collection pending first data collection pending first data collection Administrative data in MLD M&E Section in MLD annually Administrative data in MLD M&E Section in MLD annually Output 2: Increased capacity of citizens, communities and marginalized groups to assert their rights and hold local governments accountable (8.7m USD) indicators to be defined once key activities are better defined (e.g. information, education and communication activities; Local Governance and Accountability Facility) 32
Indicators Indicator Baseline Indicator Target Means of Verification Responsibility Frequency Outcome 2: Increased capacity of Local Governments to manage resources and deliver basic services in an inclusive and equitable manner (150.8m) a.) MANAGING RESOURCES (DDCs) • % of all 75 DDCs that meet all 15 5 minimum conditions (as defined in 12/2008 by the MLD based on LSGA 1999) per fiscal year 63% (06/2008) 100% (12/2012) National Synthesis Report by LBFC LBFC annually • % of DDCs that score above 50 points in all 62 6 performance measurements and meet the minimum score in all 8 functional areas • % of all 75 DDCs that spend more than 80% of planned capital development budget 7 per year • % of all 75 DDCs that spend more than 10% of internal income explicitly on women, children, DAGs, disabled and old people per fiscal year 41% (06/2008) TBD after analysis of LBFC financial records in 2009 29% (06/2008) 90% (12/2012) TBD after analysis of LBFC financial records in 2009 75% (12/2012) National Synthesis Report by LBFC LBFC annually LBFC financial records LBFC annually Annual MC/PM assessment report for DDCs • % of all 75 DDCs that have less then 2% irregular expenditure 8 9% 80% Annual MC/PM assessment report LBFC annually (06/2008) (12/2012) for DDCs MANAGING RESOURCES (MUNICIPALITIES) • % of all 58 municipalities that meet the Minimum Conditions (as MC/PM 100% National Synthesis Report LBFC LBFC annually defined by MLD based on LSGA in 1999) per fiscal year assessment.2009 (2012) Indicator(s) on performance measurements to be defined pending the finalization of the municipality MC/PM guidelines MANAGING RESOURCES (VDCs) • % of all 3915 VDCs that meet the Minimum Conditions (as defined by MLD based on LSGA in 1999) MC/PM assessment 2009 100% (2012) National Synthesis Report by LBFC LBFC annually MONITORING AND REPORTING • % of outcome indicators for which data supposed to be available are updated per year • % of DDCs that submit to MLD an annual report based on a template designed by MLD which includes a synthesized report on VDCs within August 15 th b.) BASIC SOCIAL SERVICES • % of citizens who say that the infrastructure (roads, drinking water, electricity) offered by the local governments better meet their needs than last year • % of DDCs which increase their internal revenues (excludes revenue sharing and central grants) by at least 15% compared to the previous fiscal year • Number of LGCDP pilot projects which were scaled up with government or development partner funds outside the LGCDP budget TBD after assessment in 2009 template not yet designed TBD by LGCDP BLS 2009 TBD by LGCDP BLS 2009 0 (04/2009) LBFC 100% (2012) LGCDP indicator tracking sheets M&E Section of MLD 100% (2012) Reports from DDCs submitted to MLD TBD after LGCDP BLS TBD after LGCDP BLS 3 (04/2012) Sample surveys M&E Section of MLD M&E Section of MLD annually annually annually annually Financial records of LBFC LBFC annually MLD reports M&E Section of MLD annually 5 currently only 12 out of 15 minimum conditions are in use 6 currently only 57 out of 62 performance measurements are in use 7 this refers to budget line 6.4., 6.5., 6.6. 8 as defined by the final audit report per fiscal year 33
Page 1 and 2: Ains Local Government and Community
Page 3 and 4: 1. LGCDP Monitoring and Evaluation
Page 5 and 6: Access to public goods/general Indi
Page 7 and 8: 1.3. OUTCOMES OUTCOME 1 LGCDP Outco
Page 9 and 10: Indicators: • % of participants a
Page 11 and 12: ) ACCOUNTABILITY The following indi
Page 13 and 14: a.) MANAGING RESOURCES DDCs Indicat
Page 15 and 16: VDCs Indicator: % of all 3915 VDCs
Page 17 and 18: OUTCOME 3 LGCDP Outcome 3: Strength
Page 19 and 20: STAFFING POLICIES Indicator: Local
Page 21 and 22: Indicator: % of VDC Secretaries who
Page 23 and 24: LGCDP Sample Surveys do complement
Page 25 and 26: LGCDP MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLA
Page 27 and 28: 2069 1 st Trimester: • Indicator
Page 29 and 30: Indicators Indicator Baseline Indic
Page 31: INCLUSION • % total budget of DDC
Page 35 and 36: Indicators Indicator Baseline Indic
Page 37 and 38: ANNEX 2: TEMPLATE FOR INDICATOR TRA
Page 39: HOUSEHOLD / CITIZEN LEVEL % of rura

LGCDP M&E Framework

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?