LGCDP M&E Framework
LGCDP M&E Framework LGCDP M&E Framework
LOCAL BODIES FISCAL COMMISSION / DMIS Indicator: LBFC database contains data on internal and external revenue generation disaggregated by all DDCs, all VDCs and all municipalities Rationale: Strengthened policies and institutional frameworks require reliable data for decisionmaking. A key function of the Local Bodies Fiscal Commission is the collection and analysis of data from DDCs, VDCs and municipalities. Limits: • The indicator is not registering partial progress, but is only registering progress if data by all three levels of local governance are available. Baseline: No (2009) Target: Yes (2012) Means of LBFC database Verification Frequency annually Responsibility LGCDP PCU Indicator: Number of unique visitors on DMIS section in MLD website per trimester Rationale: This proxy indicator tracks both the availability and quality of data collected by the Local Bodies Fiscal Commission. The underlying assumption is that the number of users accessing data from DMIS will only increase and remain at a high level if a) sufficient data is publicly and easily available and b) this data is of sufficient quality. This data can be easily collected using free online tools like Google Analysis. Limits: • The indicator only captures web-based access to data from the data base. The underlying assumption is that changes in web-based access correspond with the overall use of the data. • By tracking “unique visitors”, the same visitors accessing data on different days are counted multiple times. Baseline: 0 (2009) Target: To be determined Mov MLD website Frequency annually Responsibility M&E Section of MLD LOCAL BODIES ASSOCIATIONS Indicator: % of LDOs in DDCs who think that ADDCN is performing better now then one year ago Rationale: This indicator tracks the perception of changes in ADDCN performance and the satisfaction of its main clients over time. It serves as a proxy for changes in the performance of this Local Body. Limits: • The indicator tracks perceptions rather than actual changes. The underlying assumption is that significant improvements in performance will – over time – be reflected by changes in the perception of its key clients. Baseline: To be determined by LGCDP baseline survey in 2009 Target: To be determined after the LGCDP baseline survey Means of Sample surveys by MLD Verification Frequency Every 2 years (2009, 2011, 2013) Responsibility M&E Section of MLD Indicator: % of Executive Officers in municipalities who think that MuAN is performing better now then one year ago Rationale: This indicator tracks the perception of changes in MuAN performance and the satisfaction of its main clients over time. It serves as a proxy for changes in the performance of this Local Body. Limits: • see above Baseline: To be determined by LGCDP baseline survey in 2009 Target: To be determined after the LGCDP baseline survey Mov Sample surveys by MLD Frequency Every 2 years (2009, 2011, 2013) Responsibility M&E Section of MLD 20
Indicator: % of VDC Secretaries who think that NAVIN is performing better now then one year ago Rationale: This indicator tracks the perception of changes in NAVINs performance and the satisfaction of its main clients over time. It serves as a proxy for changes in the performance of this Local Body. Limits: • see above Baseline: To be determined by LGCDP baseline survey in 2009 Target: To be determined after the LGCDP baseline survey Means of Sample surveys by MLD Verification Frequency Every 2 years (2009, 2011, 2013) Responsibility M&E Section of MLD MAINSTREAMING GENDER EQUALITY AND SOCIAL INCLUSION Indicator: % of DDCs that conduct GE/SI audit per year (proxy for implementation of GE/SI strategy) Rationale: This indicator is a proxy for the extent the GE/SI is implemented. Limits: • The proxy indicator does not track implementation per se, but a key aspect of the implementation of the GE/SI strategy. • The indicator does not capture the extent to which audit results are acted upon. Baseline: 0 (04/2009) Target: 50% (2012) Means of MLD administrative data Verification Frequency annually Responsibility M&E Section of MLD CHILD-FRIENDLY LOCAL GOVERNANCE Outcome Indicator: Number of local bodies (VDC, Municipalities and district) that have adopted child-friendly local governance (CFLG) Rational: • Child-Friendly Local Governance is reflected in the TYIP and NPC annual planning guidelines. • There is a provision for allocating 25% of VDC block grant for CFLG VDCs in the approved VDC block grant guidelines. • The child-friendly approach is accepted as key principles of local governance in the LGCDP programme document. Limits: Just adoption may not ensure that local bodies have agreed to implement the CFLG framework and guidelines Baseline: 0 (2008) Four districts, one Municipality and 6 VDCs have initiated CFLG. Target: 122 (2012) 75 VDCs, 37 districts and 10 Municipality Means of MLD annual reports Verification Frequency Annual 21
- Page 1 and 2: Ains Local Government and Community
- Page 3 and 4: 1. LGCDP Monitoring and Evaluation
- Page 5 and 6: Access to public goods/general Indi
- Page 7 and 8: 1.3. OUTCOMES OUTCOME 1 LGCDP Outco
- Page 9 and 10: Indicators: • % of participants a
- Page 11 and 12: ) ACCOUNTABILITY The following indi
- Page 13 and 14: a.) MANAGING RESOURCES DDCs Indicat
- Page 15 and 16: VDCs Indicator: % of all 3915 VDCs
- Page 17 and 18: OUTCOME 3 LGCDP Outcome 3: Strength
- Page 19: STAFFING POLICIES Indicator: Local
- Page 23 and 24: LGCDP Sample Surveys do complement
- Page 25 and 26: LGCDP MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLA
- Page 27 and 28: 2069 1 st Trimester: • Indicator
- Page 29 and 30: Indicators Indicator Baseline Indic
- Page 31 and 32: INCLUSION • % total budget of DDC
- Page 33 and 34: Indicators Indicator Baseline Indic
- Page 35 and 36: Indicators Indicator Baseline Indic
- Page 37 and 38: ANNEX 2: TEMPLATE FOR INDICATOR TRA
- Page 39: HOUSEHOLD / CITIZEN LEVEL % of rura
Indicator: % of VDC Secretaries who think that NAVIN is performing better now then one<br />
year ago<br />
Rationale: This indicator tracks the perception of changes in NAVINs performance and the satisfaction<br />
of its main clients over time. It serves as a proxy for changes in the performance of this<br />
Local Body.<br />
Limits: • see above<br />
Baseline: To be determined by <strong>LGCDP</strong> baseline survey in 2009<br />
Target:<br />
To be determined after the <strong>LGCDP</strong> baseline survey<br />
Means of<br />
Sample surveys by MLD<br />
Verification<br />
Frequency Every 2 years (2009, 2011, 2013)<br />
Responsibility M&E Section of MLD<br />
MAINSTREAMING GENDER EQUALITY AND SOCIAL INCLUSION<br />
Indicator: % of DDCs that conduct GE/SI audit per year (proxy for implementation of<br />
GE/SI strategy)<br />
Rationale: This indicator is a proxy for the extent the GE/SI is implemented.<br />
Limits: • The proxy indicator does not track implementation per se, but a key aspect of<br />
the implementation of the GE/SI strategy.<br />
• The indicator does not capture the extent to which audit results are acted<br />
upon.<br />
Baseline: 0 (04/2009)<br />
Target: 50% (2012)<br />
Means of<br />
MLD administrative data<br />
Verification<br />
Frequency annually<br />
Responsibility M&E Section of MLD<br />
CHILD-FRIENDLY LOCAL GOVERNANCE<br />
Outcome<br />
Indicator:<br />
Number of local bodies (VDC, Municipalities and district) that have adopted<br />
child-friendly local governance (CFLG)<br />
Rational: • Child-Friendly Local Governance is reflected in the TYIP and NPC annual<br />
planning guidelines.<br />
• There is a provision for allocating 25% of VDC block grant for CFLG VDCs in<br />
the approved VDC block grant guidelines.<br />
• The child-friendly approach is accepted as key principles of local governance<br />
in the <strong>LGCDP</strong> programme document.<br />
Limits:<br />
Just adoption may not ensure that local bodies have agreed to implement the CFLG<br />
framework and guidelines<br />
Baseline: 0 (2008)<br />
Four districts, one Municipality and 6 VDCs have initiated CFLG.<br />
Target: 122 (2012)<br />
75 VDCs, 37 districts and 10 Municipality<br />
Means of<br />
MLD annual reports<br />
Verification<br />
Frequency Annual<br />
21
Change language