The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ready, R. C. and Abdalla, C. W. (2005) <strong>The</strong> Amenity and Disamenity <strong>Impact</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Agriculture: Estimates from a Hedonic Pricing Model. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Economics. 87(2): 314-326. Riggs, P. D. and Dean, D. J. (2007) An Investigation into the Causes <strong>of</strong> Errors and Inconsistencies in Predicted Viewsheds. Transactions in GIS. 11(2): 175-196. Rosen, S. (1974) Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal <strong>of</strong> Political Economy. 82(1): 34-55. Schwarz, G. E. (1978) Estimating the Dimension <strong>of</strong> a Model. Annals <strong>of</strong> Statistics. 6(2): 461-464. Seiler, M. J., Bond, M. T. and Seiler, V. L. (2001) <strong>The</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> World Class Great Lakes Water Views on Residential Property Values. <strong>The</strong> Appraisal Journal. 69(3): 287-295. Simons, R. (2006a) When Bad Things Happen To Good Property. Environmental Law Institute Press. Washington DC. 350 pages. ISBN: 9781585761012. Simons, R. (2006b) Peer Reviewed Evidence on Property Value <strong>Impact</strong>s by Source <strong>of</strong> Contamination. Section in When Bad Things Happen To Good Property. Environmental Law Institute Press. Washington DC. p. 350. ISBN: 9781585761012. Simons, R. A. and Saginor, J. D. (2006) A Meta-Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Effect <strong>of</strong> Environmental Contamination and Positive Amenities on Residential Real Estate Values. Journal <strong>of</strong> Real Estate Research. 28(1): 71-104. Sims, S. and Dent, P. (2007) Property Stigma: <strong>Wind</strong> Farms Are Just <strong>The</strong> Latest Fashion. Journal <strong>of</strong> Property Investment & Finance. 25(6): 626-651. Sims, S., Dent, P. and Oskrochi, G. R. (2008) Modeling the <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> Farms on House Prices in the UK. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Strategic Property Management. 12(4): 251- 269. Sirmans, G. S., Lynn, M., Macpherson, D. A. and Zietz, E. N. (2005a). <strong>The</strong> Value <strong>of</strong> Housing Characteristics: A Meta Analysis. Presented at Mid Year Meeting <strong>of</strong> the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association. May 2005. Sirmans, G. S., Macpherson, D. A. and Zietz, E. N. (2005b) <strong>The</strong> Composition <strong>of</strong> Hedonic Pricing Models. Journal <strong>of</strong> Real Estate Literature. 13(1): 3-42. Sterzinger, G., Beck, F. and Kostiuk, D. (2003) <strong>The</strong> Effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> Development on Local Property Values. Renewable Energy Policy Project, Washington, DC. May, 2003. 77 pages. Thayer, M., Albers, H. and Rhamation, M. (1992) <strong>The</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> Landfills on Residential Property Values. Journal <strong>of</strong> Real Estate Research. 7(3): 265-282. Thayer, R. L. and Freeman, C. N. (1987) Altamont: Public Perceptions <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Wind</strong> Energy Landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning. 14(1987): 379-398. Torres-Sibillea, A., V. Cloquell-Ballester and Darton, R. (2009) Development and Validation <strong>of</strong> a Multicriteria Indicator for the Assessment <strong>of</strong> Objective Aesthetic <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> Farms. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 13(1): 40-66. United States Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (USDA) (1995) Landscape Aesthetics: A Handbook for Scenic Management. United States Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture - Forest Service, Washington, DC. December 1995. United States Department <strong>of</strong> Energy (US DOE) (2008) 20% <strong>Wind</strong> Energy by 2030: Increasing <strong>Wind</strong> Energy's Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, Washington, DC. May, 2008. 248 pages. 80
Watson, M. (2005) Estimation <strong>of</strong> Social and Environmental Externalities for Electricity Infrastructure in the Northwest Sector. Reviewed by Martin Hill. Prepared for Prepared for Parsons Brinckerh<strong>of</strong>f by Integral Energy, Sydney, Australia. August 2005. 73 pages. White, H. (1980) A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 48(4): 817-838. Wiser, R. and Bolinger, M. (2009) 2008 <strong>Wind</strong> Technologies Market Report. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Prepared for U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, Washington, DC. July, 2009. 68 pages. DOE/GO-102009-2868. Wiser, R. and Hand, M. (2010) <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Power</strong>: How Much, How Soon, and At What Cost? Section in Generating Electricity in a Carbon-Constrained World. Elsevier. Oxford, UK. p. 632. ISBN-13: 978-1-85617-655-2. Wolsink, M. (1989) Attitudes and Expectancies about <strong>Wind</strong> Turbines and <strong>Wind</strong> Farms. <strong>Wind</strong> Engineering. 13(4): 196-206. Wolsink, M. (2000) <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Power</strong> and the NIMBY-Myth: Institutional Capacity and the Limited Significance <strong>of</strong> Public Support. Renewable Energy. 21(1): 49-64. Zarem, K. L. (2005) Direct Testimony Regarding Forward <strong>Wind</strong> Project, Dodge and Fond Du Lac Counties, Wisconsin. Public Service Commission <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. June, 2005. 12 pages. Docket No. 9300-CE-100. 81
Page 1 and 2:
LBNL-2829E ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE
Page 3 and 4:
LBNL-2829E The <st
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents
Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables Tab
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements The</stron
Page 11 and 12:
This report builds on the previous
Page 13 and 14:
Table ES-2: Impact
Page 15 and 16:
Figure ES-3: Base Model Results: Sc
Page 17 and 18:
In the Distance Stability Model, fo
Page 19 and 20:
1. Introduction Wind</stron
Page 21 and 22:
model 7 and uses various forms <str
Page 23 and 24:
A particularly useful application <
Page 25 and 26:
Using different statistical methods
Page 27 and 28:
Table 1: Summary of</strong
Page 29 and 30:
By using a variety of</stro
Page 31 and 32:
minimum of 164 fee
Page 33 and 34:
3.2.2. GIS Data GIS data on parcel
Page 35 and 36:
In addition to the qualitative VIEW
Page 37 and 38:
with the rest of t
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 4: Frequency of</str
Page 41 and 42:
4. Base Hedonic Model This section
Page 43 and 44:
impose the least structure on the u
Page 45 and 46:
of the home, home
Page 47 and 48: etween the reference study area (WA
Page 49 and 50: Figure 7: Results from the Base Mod
Page 51 and 52: 5. Alternative Hedonic Models <stro
Page 53 and 54: concentrated inside of</str
Page 55 and 56: all other components are as defined
Page 57 and 58: the distance from them might not oc
Page 59 and 60: explanation is that the additional
Page 61 and 62: 6) More than four years after const
Page 63 and 64: Table 19: Results from Temporal Asp
Page 65 and 66: Turning to the coefficient differen
Page 67 and 68: Table 21: Frequency Crosstab <stron
Page 69 and 70: 5.6.1. Dataset and Model Form Data
Page 71 and 72: with the scenic vista. In other wor
Page 73 and 74: 6. Repeat Sales Analysis In general
Page 75 and 76: Table 27: List of
Page 77 and 78: adjustment, and represent another t
Page 79 and 80: that are located within one mile <s
Page 81 and 82: 7. Sales Volume Analysis Th
Page 83 and 84: Figure 11: Sales Volumes by PERIOD
Page 85 and 86: three years before announcement), a
Page 87 and 88: 8. Wind Pr
Page 89 and 90: Drawing from the previous literatur
Page 91 and 92: Taken together, the results from al
Page 93 and 94: 9. Conclusions Though surveys gener
Page 95 and 96: Davis, L. W. (2008) The</st
Page 97: LeSage, J. P. (1999) The</s
Page 101 and 102: Figure A - 1: Map of</stron
Page 103 and 104: all very small communities with lit
Page 105 and 106: A.2 TXHC Study Area: Howard County
Page 107 and 108: Census Statistics Name Type 2007 Po
Page 109 and 110: Data Collection and Summary County
Page 111 and 112: A.4 IABV Study Area: Buena Vista Co
Page 113 and 114: Variables of Inter
Page 115 and 116: facilities than the towns o
Page 117 and 118: A.6 WIKCDC Study Area: Kewaunee and
Page 121 and 122: elatively high elevations o
Page 123 and 124: A.8 PAWC Study Area: Wayne County (
Page 125 and 126: Census Statistics Name Type 2007 Po
Page 127 and 128: ural landscapes, with the largest p
Page 129 and 130: A.10 NYMC Study Area: Madison Count
Page 133 and 134: account, combined with the determin
Page 135 and 136: Appendix C: Field Data Collection I
Page 137 and 138: Figure A - 14: Field Data Collectio
Page 139 and 140: ABOVE AVERAGE VISTA PREMIUM VISTA 1
Page 141 and 142: EXTREME VIEW 6 turbines visible fro
Page 143 and 144: 5 is a vector of d
Page 145 and 146: values, that effect seems likely to
Page 147 and 148: unrestricted Home and Site Characte
Page 149 and 150:
with coefficients above zero and th
Page 151 and 152:
Figure A - 15: Histogram of
Page 153 and 154:
The M Distance his
Page 155 and 156:
sold within the preceding six month
Page 157 and 158:
Appendix H: Alternative Models: Ful
Page 159 and 160:
Table A - 8: Full Results for the C
Page 161 and 162:
Table A - 10: Full Results for the
Page 163 and 164:
Table A - 11: Full Results for the
show all

The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?