The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...
Share Embed Flag
Download ePaper

The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...

The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ... The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...

ontario.sea.org
from ontario.sea.org More from this publisher
06.05.2014 Views

List ong>ofong> Figures Figure 1: Map ong>ofong> Study Areas and Potential Study Areas............................................................ 12 Figure 2: Frequency ong>ofong> VISTA Ratings for All and Post-Construction Transactions.................. 20 Figure 3: Frequency ong>ofong> DISTANCE Ratings for Post-Construction Transactions....................... 20 Figure 4: Frequency ong>ofong> VIEW Ratings for Post-Construction Transactions ................................ 21 Figure 5: Results from the Base Model for VISTA...................................................................... 29 Figure 6: Results from the Base Model for VIEW ....................................................................... 30 Figure 7: Results from the Base Model for DISTANCE.............................................................. 31 Figure 8: Results from the Temporal Aspects Model................................................................... 46 Figure 9: Repeat Sales Model Results for VIEW.........................................................................61 Figure 10: Repeat Sales Model Results for DISTANCE.............................................................. 61 Figure 11: Sales Volumes by PERIOD and DISTANCE ............................................................. 65 Figure A - 1: Map ong>ofong> Study Areas ................................................................................................ 83 Figure A - 2: Map ong>ofong> WAOR Study Area..................................................................................... 84 Figure A - 3: Map ong>ofong> TXHC Study Area ...................................................................................... 87 Figure A - 4: Map ong>ofong> OKCC Study Area...................................................................................... 90 Figure A - 5: Map ong>ofong> IABV Study Area ....................................................................................... 93 Figure A - 6: Map ong>ofong> ILLC Study Area ........................................................................................ 96 Figure A - 7: Map ong>ofong> WIKCDC Study Area................................................................................. 99 Figure A - 8: Map ong>ofong> PASC Study Area..................................................................................... 102 Figure A - 9: Map ong>ofong> PAWC Study Area ................................................................................... 105 Figure A - 10: Map ong>ofong> NYMCOC Study Area ........................................................................... 108 Figure A - 11: Map ong>ofong> NYMC Study Area................................................................................. 111 Figure A - 12: Field Data Collection Instrument........................................................................ 117 Figure A - 13: Field Data Collection Instrument - Instructions - Page 1.................................... 118 Figure A - 14: Field Data Collection Instrument - Instructions - Page 2.................................... 119 Figure A - 15: Histogram ong>ofong> Standardized Residuals for Base Model ....................................... 133 Figure A - 16: Histogram ong>ofong> Mahalanobis Distance Statistics for Base Model.......................... 133 Figure A - 17: Histogram ong>ofong> Standardized Residuals for All Sales Model ................................ 134 Figure A - 18: Histogram ong>ofong> Mahalanobis Distance Statistics for All Sales Model................... 134 vii

Acknowledgements ong>Theong> work described in this report was funded by the Office ong>ofong> Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (ong>Windong> & Hydropower Technologies Program) ong>ofong> the U.S. Department ong>ofong> Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. ong>Theong> authors would particularly like to thank Megan McCluer, Patrick Gilman, Jim Ahlgrimm, Michele Desautels, and Steve Lindenberg, all ong>ofong> the U.S. Department ong>ofong> Energy, for their long-term support ong>ofong> this work. For reviewing drafts ong>ofong> this report and/or for providing comments that helped shape the early thinking on this project, the authors thank Mark Bolinger, Galen Barbose, and Larry Dale (Berkeley Lab), Alejandro Moreno (US DOE), Larry Flowers and Eric Lantz (NREL), Peter Dent and Sally Sims (Oxford Brookes University), Sandy Bond (Curtin Business School), Randy Winter, Dave Loomis, and Jennifer Hinman (Illinois State University), Thomas Priestley (CH2M Hill), Barton DeLacy (Cushman & Wakefield), Dave Maturen (Maturen Appraisal), Mike McCann (McCann Appraisal), Tom Hewson (Energy Ventures Analysis), Kimberly Centera (AES), Jeff Peterson (NYSERDA), Charles Kubert (Clean Energy Group), Lisa Linowes (Industrial ong>Windong> Action), Chris Taylor (Element ong>Powerong>), Sam Enfield (MAP Royalty, Inc.), and Laurie Jodziewicz (AWEA). Of course, any remaining omissions or inaccuracies are those ong>ofong> the authors. viii

Acknowledgements<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> work described in this report was funded by the Office <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Energy Efficiency and Renewable<br />

Energy (<str<strong>on</strong>g>Wind</str<strong>on</strong>g> & Hydropower Technologies Program) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the U.S. Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Energy under<br />

C<strong>on</strong>tract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> authors would particularly like to thank Megan<br />

McCluer, Patrick Gilman, Jim Ahlgrimm, Michele Desautels, and Steve Lindenberg, all <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

U.S. Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Energy, for their l<strong>on</strong>g-term support <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this work. For reviewing drafts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this<br />

report and/or for providing comments that helped shape the early thinking <strong>on</strong> this project, the<br />

authors thank Mark Bolinger, Galen Barbose, and Larry Dale (Berkeley Lab), Alejandro Moreno<br />

(US DOE), Larry Flowers and Eric Lantz (NREL), Peter Dent and Sally Sims (Oxford Brookes<br />

University), Sandy B<strong>on</strong>d (Curtin Business School), Randy Winter, Dave Loomis, and Jennifer<br />

Hinman (Illinois State University), Thomas Priestley (CH2M Hill), Bart<strong>on</strong> DeLacy (Cushman &<br />

Wakefield), Dave Maturen (Maturen Appraisal), Mike McCann (McCann Appraisal), Tom<br />

Hews<strong>on</strong> (Energy Ventures Analysis), Kimberly Centera (AES), Jeff Peters<strong>on</strong> (NYSERDA),<br />

Charles Kubert (Clean Energy Group), Lisa Linowes (Industrial <str<strong>on</strong>g>Wind</str<strong>on</strong>g> Acti<strong>on</strong>), Chris Taylor<br />

(Element <str<strong>on</strong>g>Power</str<strong>on</strong>g>), Sam Enfield (MAP Royalty, Inc.), and Laurie Jodziewicz (AWEA). Of course,<br />

any remaining omissi<strong>on</strong>s or inaccuracies are those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the authors.<br />

viii

logo

products

Resources

Company

Terms of service
Privacy policy
Cookie policy
Cookie settings
Imprint
Change language
Made with love in Switzerland
© 2024 Yumpu.com all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!