The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...
The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ... The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...
Table 18: Frequency Crosstab
Table 19: Results from Temporal Aspects Model Temporal Aspects Variables
- Page 11 and 12: This report builds on the previous
- Page 13 and 14: Table ES-2: Impact
- Page 15 and 16: Figure ES-3: Base Model Results: Sc
- Page 17 and 18: In the Distance Stability Model, fo
- Page 19 and 20: 1. Introduction Wind</stron
- Page 21 and 22: model 7 and uses various forms <str
- Page 23 and 24: A particularly useful application <
- Page 25 and 26: Using different statistical methods
- Page 27 and 28: Table 1: Summary of</strong
- Page 29 and 30: By using a variety of</stro
- Page 31 and 32: minimum of 164 fee
- Page 33 and 34: 3.2.2. GIS Data GIS data on parcel
- Page 35 and 36: In addition to the qualitative VIEW
- Page 37 and 38: with the rest of t
- Page 39 and 40: Figure 4: Frequency of</str
- Page 41 and 42: 4. Base Hedonic Model This section
- Page 43 and 44: impose the least structure on the u
- Page 45 and 46: of the home, home
- Page 47 and 48: etween the reference study area (WA
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 7: Results from the Base Mod
- Page 51 and 52: 5. Alternative Hedonic Models <stro
- Page 53 and 54: concentrated inside of</str
- Page 55 and 56: all other components are as defined
- Page 57 and 58: the distance from them might not oc
- Page 59 and 60: explanation is that the additional
- Page 61: 6) More than four years after const
- Page 65 and 66: Turning to the coefficient differen
- Page 67 and 68: Table 21: Frequency Crosstab <stron
- Page 69 and 70: 5.6.1. Dataset and Model Form Data
- Page 71 and 72: with the scenic vista. In other wor
- Page 73 and 74: 6. Repeat Sales Analysis In general
- Page 75 and 76: Table 27: List of
- Page 77 and 78: adjustment, and represent another t
- Page 79 and 80: that are located within one mile <s
- Page 81 and 82: 7. Sales Volume Analysis Th
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 11: Sales Volumes by PERIOD
- Page 85 and 86: three years before announcement), a
- Page 87 and 88: 8. Wind Pr
- Page 89 and 90: Drawing from the previous literatur
- Page 91 and 92: Taken together, the results from al
- Page 93 and 94: 9. Conclusions Though surveys gener
- Page 95 and 96: Davis, L. W. (2008) The</st
- Page 97 and 98: LeSage, J. P. (1999) The</s
- Page 99 and 100: Watson, M. (2005) Estimation <stron
- Page 101 and 102: Figure A - 1: Map of</stron
- Page 103 and 104: all very small communities with lit
- Page 105 and 106: A.2 TXHC Study Area: Howard County
- Page 107 and 108: Census Statistics Name Type 2007 Po
- Page 109 and 110: Data Collection and Summary County
- Page 111 and 112: A.4 IABV Study Area: Buena Vista Co
Table 19: Results from Temporal Aspects Model<br />
Temporal Aspects<br />
Variables <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Interest Coef SE p Value n<br />
More Than 2 Years Before Announcement -0.13 0.06 0.02 38<br />
Less Than 2 Years Before Announcement -0.10 0.05 0.06 40<br />
Inside 1 Mile<br />
Between 1-3<br />
Miles<br />
Between 3-5<br />
Miles<br />
Outside 5 Miles<br />
Model Informati<strong>on</strong><br />
Model Equati<strong>on</strong> Number<br />
Dependent Variable<br />
Number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Cases<br />
Number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Predictors (k)<br />
F Statistic<br />
Adjusted R Squared<br />
After Announcement Before C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> -0.14 0.06 0.04 21<br />
2 Years After C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> -0.09 0.07 0.11 39<br />
Between 2 and 4 Years After C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> -0.01 0.06 0.85 44<br />
More Than 4 Years After C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> -0.07 0.08 0.22 42<br />
More Than 2 Years Before Announcement -0.04 0.03 0.18 283<br />
Less Than 2 Years Before Announcement 0.00 0.03 0.91 592<br />
After Announcement Before C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> -0.02 0.03 0.54 342<br />
2 Years After C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> 0.00 0.03 0.90 807<br />
Between 2 and 4 Years After C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> 0.01 0.03 0.78 503<br />
More Than 4 Years After C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> 0.00 0.03 0.93 710<br />
More Than 2 Years Before Announcement 0.00 0.04 0.92 157<br />
Less Than 2 Years Before Announcement 0.00 0.03 0.97 380<br />
After Announcement Before C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> 0.00 0.03 0.93 299<br />
2 Years After C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> 0.02 0.03 0.55 574<br />
Between 2 and 4 Years After C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> 0.01 0.03 0.65 594<br />
More Than 4 Years After C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> 0.01 0.03 0.67 758<br />
More Than 2 Years Before Announcement Omitted Omitted Omitted 132<br />
Less Than 2 Years Before Announcement -0.03 0.04 0.33 133<br />
After Announcement Before C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> -0.03 0.03 0.39 105<br />
2 Years After C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> -0.03 0.03 0.44 215<br />
Between 2 and 4 Years After C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> 0.03 0.03 0.44 227<br />
More Than 4 Years After C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> 0.01 0.03 0.73 424<br />
"Omitted" = reference category for fixed effects variables.<br />
"n" indicates number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cases in category when category = "1"<br />
7<br />
LN_SalePrice96<br />
7459<br />
56<br />
404.5<br />
0.75<br />
What these results suggest (as shown in Figure 8) is that homes inside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e mile in the sample,<br />
<strong>on</strong> average, were depressed in value (in relati<strong>on</strong> to the reference category) before and after the<br />
announcement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the wind facility and up to the point that c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> began, but that those<br />
values rebounded somewhat after c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> commenced. 81 This c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> also likely<br />
explains why a significant and negative effect for homes that sold between 3000 feet and <strong>on</strong>e<br />
mile is found in the All Sales Model presented in Secti<strong>on</strong> 5.3: homes within this distance range<br />
that sold prior to facility c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> were depressed in value and most likely drove the results<br />
for homes that sold after announcement. Regardless, these results are not suggestive <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a<br />
pervasive Nuisance Stigma.<br />
81 As discussed in footnotes 47 (<strong>on</strong> page 19) and 74 (<strong>on</strong> page 38), the “announcement date” <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten refers to the first<br />
time the proposed facility appeared in the press. “Awareness” <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the project in the community may precede this<br />
date, however, and therefore transacti<strong>on</strong>s occurring in the period “less than two years before announcement” could<br />
c<strong>on</strong>ceivably have been influenced by the prospective wind project, but it is c<strong>on</strong>siderably less likely that those in the<br />
period more than two years before announcement would have been influenced.<br />
45