The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...

The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ... The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...

ontario.sea.org
from ontario.sea.org More from this publisher
06.05.2014 Views

Abstract With wind energy expanding rapidly in the U.S. and abroad, and with an increasing number ong>ofong> communities considering wind power development nearby, there is an urgent need to empirically investigate common community concerns about wind project development. ong>Theong> concern that property values will be adversely affected by wind energy facilities is commonly put forth by stakeholders. Although this concern is not unreasonable, given property value impacts that have been found near high voltage transmission lines and other electric generation facilities, the impacts ong>ofong> wind energy facilities on residential property values had not previously been investigated thoroughly. ong>Theong> present research collected data on almost 7,500 sales ong>ofong> singlefamily homes situated within 10 miles ong>ofong> 24 existing wind facilities in nine different U.S. states. ong>Theong> conclusions ong>ofong> the study are drawn from eight different hedonic pricing models, as well as both repeat sales and sales volume models. ong>Theong> various analyses are strongly consistent in that none ong>ofong> the models uncovers conclusive evidence ong>ofong> the existence ong>ofong> any widespread property value impacts that might be present in communities surrounding wind energy facilities. Specifically, neither the view ong>ofong> the wind facilities nor the distance ong>ofong> the home to those facilities is found to have any consistent, measurable, and statistically significant effect on home sales prices. Although the analysis cannot dismiss the possibility that individual homes or small numbers ong>ofong> homes have been or could be negatively impacted, it finds that if these impacts do exist, they are either too small and/or too infrequent to result in any widespread, statistically observable impact. iii

Table ong>ofong> Contents List ong>ofong> Tables ................................................................................................................................. vi List ong>ofong> Figures............................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements......................................................................................................................viii Executive Summary....................................................................................................................... ix 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................. 1 2. Previous Research................................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Hedonic Models and Environmental Disamenities......................................................... 4 2.2. ong>Impactong>s ong>ofong> ong>Windong> ong>Projectsong> on Property Values................................................................ 6 3. Data Overview ...................................................................................................................... 10 3.1. Site Selection ................................................................................................................ 10 3.2. Data Collection ............................................................................................................. 13 3.2.1. Tabular Data.......................................................................................................... 13 3.2.2. GIS Data................................................................................................................ 15 3.2.3. Field Data.............................................................................................................. 15 3.2.4. Field Data Collection ............................................................................................ 18 3.3. Data Summary .............................................................................................................. 18 4. Base Hedonic Model............................................................................................................. 23 4.1. Dataset........................................................................................................................... 23 4.2. Model Form .................................................................................................................. 24 4.3. Analysis ong>ofong> Results ....................................................................................................... 28 5. Alternative Hedonic Models ................................................................................................. 33 5.1. View and Distance Stability Models............................................................................. 33 5.1.1. Dataset and Model Form....................................................................................... 34 5.1.2. Analysis ong>ofong> Results ............................................................................................... 35 5.2. Continuous Distance Model.......................................................................................... 36 5.2.1. Dataset and Model Form....................................................................................... 36 5.2.2. Analysis ong>ofong> Results ............................................................................................... 37 5.3. All Sales Model............................................................................................................. 37 5.3.1. Dataset and Model Form....................................................................................... 38 5.3.2. Analysis ong>ofong> Results ............................................................................................... 39 5.4. Temporal Aspects Model.............................................................................................. 42 5.4.1. Dataset and Model Form....................................................................................... 42 5.4.2. Analysis ong>ofong> Results ............................................................................................... 44 5.5. Orientation Model......................................................................................................... 47 5.5.1. Dataset and Model Form....................................................................................... 47 5.5.2. Analysis ong>ofong> Results ............................................................................................... 49 5.6. Overlap Model .............................................................................................................. 50 5.6.1. Dataset and Model Form....................................................................................... 51 5.6.2. Analysis ong>ofong> Results ............................................................................................... 52 6. Repeat Sales Analysis ........................................................................................................... 55 6.1. Repeat Sales Models and Environmental Disamenities Literature............................... 55 iv

Abstract<br />

With wind energy expanding rapidly in the U.S. and abroad, and with an increasing number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

communities c<strong>on</strong>sidering wind power development nearby, there is an urgent need to empirically<br />

investigate comm<strong>on</strong> community c<strong>on</strong>cerns about wind project development. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cern that<br />

property values will be adversely affected by wind energy facilities is comm<strong>on</strong>ly put forth by<br />

stakeholders. Although this c<strong>on</strong>cern is not unreas<strong>on</strong>able, given property value impacts that have<br />

been found near high voltage transmissi<strong>on</strong> lines and other electric generati<strong>on</strong> facilities, the<br />

impacts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> wind energy facilities <strong>on</strong> residential property values had not previously been<br />

investigated thoroughly. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> present research collected data <strong>on</strong> almost 7,500 sales <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> singlefamily<br />

homes situated within 10 miles <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 24 existing wind facilities in nine different U.S. states.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the study are drawn from eight different hed<strong>on</strong>ic pricing models, as well as<br />

both repeat sales and sales volume models. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> various analyses are str<strong>on</strong>gly c<strong>on</strong>sistent in that<br />

n<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the models uncovers c<strong>on</strong>clusive evidence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the existence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any widespread property<br />

value impacts that might be present in communities surrounding wind energy facilities.<br />

Specifically, neither the view <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the wind facilities nor the distance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the home to those facilities<br />

is found to have any c<strong>on</strong>sistent, measurable, and statistically significant effect <strong>on</strong> home sales<br />

prices. Although the analysis cannot dismiss the possibility that individual homes or small<br />

numbers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> homes have been or could be negatively impacted, it finds that if these impacts do<br />

exist, they are either too small and/or too infrequent to result in any widespread, statistically<br />

observable impact.<br />

iii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!