06.05.2014 Views

The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...

The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...

The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

slightly better than average c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>. 48 Within the full sample, 6% and 58% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> homes had a<br />

poor or below average VISTA rating, respectively; 26% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> homes received an average rating <strong>on</strong><br />

this scale, with 9% above average and 2% experiencing premium vistas (see Figure 2).<br />

Figure 2: Frequency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> VISTA Ratings for All and Post-C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> Transacti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

All Transacti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

470<br />

4,301<br />

1,912<br />

659<br />

117<br />

PostC<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> Transacti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

310<br />

2,857<br />

1,247<br />

448<br />

75<br />

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%<br />

Poor Below Average Average Above Average Premium<br />

With respect to the variables <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> interest, am<strong>on</strong>g the post-c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> subset <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4,937 transacti<strong>on</strong>s,<br />

the frequency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the DISTANCE categories is found to follow geometry with the smallest<br />

numbers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> transacti<strong>on</strong>s occurring near the wind turbines and ever increasing numbers further<br />

away (see Figure 3). 67 transacti<strong>on</strong>s (1%) are situated inside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 3,000 feet (< 0.57 Miles), 58<br />

(1%) are between 3,000 feet and <strong>on</strong>e mile (0.57-1 mile), 2,019 (41%) occur outside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e mile<br />

but inside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> three miles (1-3 miles), 1,923 (39%) occur between three and five miles (3-5 miles),<br />

and 870 (18%) occur outside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> five miles (>5 miles). 49 In this same post-c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> group, a<br />

total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 730 homes that sold (15%) have a view <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the wind turbines (see Figure 4). A large<br />

majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those homes have MINOR view ratings (n = 561, 11% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> total), with 2% having<br />

MODERATE ratings (n=106) and the remaining transacti<strong>on</strong>s roughly split between<br />

SUBSTANTIAL and EXTREME ratings (n=35, 0.6%, and n=28, 0.5%, respectively). A full<br />

descripti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the variables <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> interest and how they are arrayed at the study area level is<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tained in Appendix A.<br />

Figure 3: Frequency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> DISTANCE Ratings for Post-C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> Transacti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

1 - 3 MIle<br />

(n = 2019)<br />

3000 Feet -<br />

1 Mile<br />

(n = 58)<br />

3 - 5 Miles<br />

(n = 1923)<br />

> 5 Miles<br />

(n = 870)<br />

Other<br />

< 3000 Feet<br />

(n = 67)<br />

48 <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> variable for the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the home was not uniform across study areas because, in some cases, it took into<br />

account c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> grade while in others it did not.<br />

49 <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se numbers and percentages are skewed slightly from the overall populati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> transacti<strong>on</strong>s because homes<br />

outside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> three miles were <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten under-sampled to reduce field data collecti<strong>on</strong> burdens. Further, higher numbers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

homes fall into each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the categories when the post-announcement-pre-c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> transacti<strong>on</strong>s are included, as<br />

they are in some models. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se additi<strong>on</strong>al transacti<strong>on</strong>s are described below in Table 7 under “All Sales.”<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!