The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...
The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ... The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...
Appendix F: Selecting the Primary (“Base”) Hedonic Model Equation (1) as described in Section 4.2 is presented in this report as the primary (or “Base”) model to which all other models are compared. As noted earlier, in the Base Hedonic Model and in all subsequent models presented in Section 5 all variables
5 is a vector
- Page 91 and 92: Taken together, the results from al
- Page 93 and 94: 9. Conclusions Though surveys gener
- Page 95 and 96: Davis, L. W. (2008) The</st
- Page 97 and 98: LeSage, J. P. (1999) The</s
- Page 99 and 100: Watson, M. (2005) Estimation <stron
- Page 101 and 102: Figure A - 1: Map of</stron
- Page 103 and 104: all very small communities with lit
- Page 105 and 106: A.2 TXHC Study Area: Howard County
- Page 107 and 108: Census Statistics Name Type 2007 Po
- Page 109 and 110: Data Collection and Summary County
- Page 111 and 112: A.4 IABV Study Area: Buena Vista Co
- Page 113 and 114: Variables of Inter
- Page 115 and 116: facilities than the towns o
- Page 117 and 118: A.6 WIKCDC Study Area: Kewaunee and
- Page 119 and 120: Variables of Inter
- Page 121 and 122: elatively high elevations o
- Page 123 and 124: A.8 PAWC Study Area: Wayne County (
- Page 125 and 126: Census Statistics Name Type 2007 Po
- Page 127 and 128: ural landscapes, with the largest p
- Page 129 and 130: A.10 NYMC Study Area: Madison Count
- Page 131 and 132: Variables of Inter
- Page 133 and 134: account, combined with the determin
- Page 135 and 136: Appendix C: Field Data Collection I
- Page 137 and 138: Figure A - 14: Field Data Collectio
- Page 139 and 140: ABOVE AVERAGE VISTA PREMIUM VISTA 1
- Page 141: EXTREME VIEW 6 turbines visible fro
- Page 145 and 146: values, that effect seems likely to
- Page 147 and 148: unrestricted Home and Site Characte
- Page 149 and 150: with coefficients above zero and th
- Page 151 and 152: Figure A - 15: Histogram of
- Page 153 and 154: The M Distance his
- Page 155 and 156: sold within the preceding six month
- Page 157 and 158: Appendix H: Alternative Models: Ful
- Page 159 and 160: Table A - 8: Full Results for the C
- Page 161 and 162: Table A - 10: Full Results for the
- Page 163 and 164: Table A - 11: Full Results for the
Appendix F: Selecting the Primary (“Base”) Hed<strong>on</strong>ic Model<br />
Equati<strong>on</strong> (1) as described in Secti<strong>on</strong> 4.2 is presented in this report as the primary (or “Base”)<br />
model to which all other models are compared. As noted earlier, in the Base Hed<strong>on</strong>ic Model and<br />
in all subsequent models presented in Secti<strong>on</strong> 5 all variables <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> interest, spatial adjustments, and<br />
home and site characteristics are pooled, and therefore their estimates represent the average<br />
across all study areas. Ideally, <strong>on</strong>e would have enough data to estimate a model at the study area<br />
level - a fully unrestricted model - rather than pooled across all areas. In this appendix,<br />
alternative model forms are presented that unrestrict these variables at the level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> study areas.<br />
As shown here, these investigati<strong>on</strong>s ultimately encouraged the selecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the somewhat simpler<br />
pooled Base Model as the primary model, and to c<strong>on</strong>tinue to use restricted or pooled models in<br />
the alternative hed<strong>on</strong>ic analyses.<br />
F.1 Discussi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Fully Unrestricted Model Form<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Base Model described by equati<strong>on</strong> (1) has variables that are pooled, and the coefficients for<br />
these variables therefore represent the average across all study areas (after accounting for study<br />
area fixed effects). An alternative (and arguably superior) approach would be to estimate<br />
coefficients at the level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each study area, thereby allowing coefficient values to vary am<strong>on</strong>g<br />
study areas. 116 This fully interacted – or unrestricted – model would take the following form:<br />
<br />
ln(P) NS Y XS (VIEWS) <br />
0 1 2 3 4<br />
s c k v<br />
<br />
d<br />
(DISTANCE S)<br />
<br />
5<br />
(F13)<br />
where<br />
P represents the inflati<strong>on</strong>-adjusted sale price,<br />
N is the spatially weighted neighbors’ predicted sale price,<br />
S is a vector <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> s study areas (e.g., WAOR, OKCC, etc.),<br />
Y is a vector <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c study area locati<strong>on</strong>al characteristics (e.g., census tract, school district, etc.),<br />
X is a vector <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> k home and site characteristics (e.g., acres, square feet, number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> bathrooms,<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the home, age <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> home, VISTA, etc.),<br />
VIEW is a vector <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> v categorical view <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> turbine variables (e.g., MINOR, MODERATE,<br />
etc.),<br />
DISTANCE is a vector <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> d categorical distance to turbine variables (e.g., less than 3000 feet,<br />
between <strong>on</strong>e and three miles, etc.),<br />
0 is the c<strong>on</strong>stant or intercept across the full sample,<br />
1 is a vector <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> s parameter estimates for the spatially weighted neighbor’s predicted sale<br />
price for S study areas,<br />
2 is a vector <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c parameter estimates for the study area locati<strong>on</strong>al fixed effect variables,<br />
3 is a vector <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> k parameter estimates for the home and site characteristics for S study areas,<br />
4 is a vector <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> v parameter estimates for the VIEW variables as compared to homes sold<br />
with no view <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the turbines for S study areas,<br />
116 For instance, the marginal c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Acres (the number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> acres) to the selling price would be estimated for<br />
each study area (i.e., Acres_WAOR, Acres_TXHC etc.), as would the variables <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> interest: VIEW and DISTANCE.<br />
124