The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...
The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ... The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...
wind facilities and therefore provides dramatic views
Variables
- Page 61 and 62: 6) More than four years after const
- Page 63 and 64: Table 19: Results from Temporal Asp
- Page 65 and 66: Turning to the coefficient differen
- Page 67 and 68: Table 21: Frequency Crosstab <stron
- Page 69 and 70: 5.6.1. Dataset and Model Form Data
- Page 71 and 72: with the scenic vista. In other wor
- Page 73 and 74: 6. Repeat Sales Analysis In general
- Page 75 and 76: Table 27: List of
- Page 77 and 78: adjustment, and represent another t
- Page 79 and 80: that are located within one mile <s
- Page 81 and 82: 7. Sales Volume Analysis Th
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 11: Sales Volumes by PERIOD
- Page 85 and 86: three years before announcement), a
- Page 87 and 88: 8. Wind Pr
- Page 89 and 90: Drawing from the previous literatur
- Page 91 and 92: Taken together, the results from al
- Page 93 and 94: 9. Conclusions Though surveys gener
- Page 95 and 96: Davis, L. W. (2008) The</st
- Page 97 and 98: LeSage, J. P. (1999) The</s
- Page 99 and 100: Watson, M. (2005) Estimation <stron
- Page 101 and 102: Figure A - 1: Map of</stron
- Page 103 and 104: all very small communities with lit
- Page 105 and 106: A.2 TXHC Study Area: Howard County
- Page 107 and 108: Census Statistics Name Type 2007 Po
- Page 109 and 110: Data Collection and Summary County
- Page 111: A.4 IABV Study Area: Buena Vista Co
- Page 115 and 116: facilities than the towns o
- Page 117 and 118: A.6 WIKCDC Study Area: Kewaunee and
- Page 119 and 120: Variables of Inter
- Page 121 and 122: elatively high elevations o
- Page 123 and 124: A.8 PAWC Study Area: Wayne County (
- Page 125 and 126: Census Statistics Name Type 2007 Po
- Page 127 and 128: ural landscapes, with the largest p
- Page 129 and 130: A.10 NYMC Study Area: Madison Count
- Page 131 and 132: Variables of Inter
- Page 133 and 134: account, combined with the determin
- Page 135 and 136: Appendix C: Field Data Collection I
- Page 137 and 138: Figure A - 14: Field Data Collectio
- Page 139 and 140: ABOVE AVERAGE VISTA PREMIUM VISTA 1
- Page 141 and 142: EXTREME VIEW 6 turbines visible fro
- Page 143 and 144: 5 is a vector of d
- Page 145 and 146: values, that effect seems likely to
- Page 147 and 148: unrestricted Home and Site Characte
- Page 149 and 150: with coefficients above zero and th
- Page 151 and 152: Figure A - 15: Histogram of
- Page 153 and 154: The M Distance his
- Page 155 and 156: sold within the preceding six month
- Page 157 and 158: Appendix H: Alternative Models: Ful
- Page 159 and 160: Table A - 8: Full Results for the C
- Page 161 and 162: Table A - 10: Full Results for the
wind facilities and therefore provides dramatic views <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the turbines. In general, except for the<br />
depressi<strong>on</strong> in which Storm Lake sits, the topography is very flat, largely made up corn fields, and<br />
the turbines are therefore visible from quite far away. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> housing market is driven, to some<br />
extent, by the water body, Storm Lake, which is a popular recreati<strong>on</strong>al tourist destinati<strong>on</strong>, and<br />
therefore development is occurring to the East and South <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the lake. Some development is also<br />
occurring, to a lesser degree, to the East <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Alta.<br />
Data Collecti<strong>on</strong> and Summary<br />
County Assessor Kathy A. Croker and Deputy Assessor Kim Carnine were both extremely<br />
helpful in answering questi<strong>on</strong>s and providing GIS data. Sales and home characteristic data were<br />
provided by Vanguard Appraisals, Inc., facilitated by the county <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficials. David Healy from<br />
MidAmerican provided some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the necessary turbine locati<strong>on</strong> GIS files.<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> county provided data <strong>on</strong> valid single-family residential transacti<strong>on</strong>s between 1996 and 2007<br />
for 1,743 homes inside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> five miles <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the nearest wind turbine. This sample exceeded the<br />
number for which field data could reas<strong>on</strong>ably be collected; as a result, <strong>on</strong>ly a sample <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these<br />
homes sales was used for the study. Specifically, all transacti<strong>on</strong>s that occurred within three miles<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the nearest turbine were used, in combinati<strong>on</strong> with a random sample (totaling roughly 10%) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
those homes between three and five miles. This approach resulted in 822 sales, with prices that<br />
ranged from $12,000 to $525,000, and a mean <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $94,713. Development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the wind facilities in<br />
this area occurred relatively early in the sample period, and therefore roughly 75% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the sales (n<br />
= 605) occurred after project c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> had commenced. Of those 605 sales, 105 had views <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
the turbines, 37 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which were ranked with a view rating more dramatic than MINOR, and 30<br />
sales occurred within <strong>on</strong>e mile <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the nearest wind turbine.<br />
Area Statistics<br />
Study Period Study Period Number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Median Mean Minimum Maximum<br />
Begin End Sales Price Price Price Price<br />
1/2/1996 3/30/2007 822 $79,000 $94,713 $12,000 $525,000<br />
Facility Statistics<br />
Facility Name<br />
Number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
MW<br />
Number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Turbines<br />
Announce<br />
Date<br />
C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />
Begin Date<br />
Completi<strong>on</strong><br />
Date<br />
Turbine<br />
Maker<br />
Hub Height<br />
(Meters)<br />
Storm Lake I 112.5 150 Feb-98 Oct-98 Jun-99 Enr<strong>on</strong> 63<br />
Storm Lake II 80.3 107 Feb-98 Oct-98 Apr-99 Enr<strong>on</strong> 63<br />
Waverly 1.5 2 Feb-98 Oct-98 Jun-99 Enr<strong>on</strong> 65<br />
Intrepid 160.5 107 Mar-03 Oct-04 Dec-04 GE <str<strong>on</strong>g>Wind</str<strong>on</strong>g> 65<br />
Intrepid Expansi<strong>on</strong> 15.0 15 Jan-05 Apr-05 Dec-05 Mitsubishi 65<br />
Source: AWEA & Ventyx Inc.<br />
94