The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...
The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ... The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...
Data Collection and Summary County
Census Statistics Name Type 2007 Population % Change Since 2000 Population Per Mile^2 Median Age Median Income Median House 2007 % Change Since 2000 Big Spring City 24,075 -5.4% 1,260 35.1 $ 32,470 $ 54,442 50% Forsan Town 220 -4.0% 758 36.8 $ 50,219 $ 64,277 84% Howard County 32,295 -1.9% 36 36.4 $ 36,684 $ 60,658 58% Texas State 23,904,380 14.6% 80 32.3 $ 47,548 $ 120,900 47% US Country 301,139,947 6.8% 86 37.9 $ 50,233 $ 243,742 46% Source: City-Data.com & Wikipedia. “% Change Since 2000” refers to the percentage change between 2000 and 2007 for the figures in the column to the left (population or median house price). “Town” signifies any municipality with less than 10,000 inhabitants. . 89
- Page 55 and 56: all other components are as defined
- Page 57 and 58: the distance from them might not oc
- Page 59 and 60: explanation is that the additional
- Page 61 and 62: 6) More than four years after const
- Page 63 and 64: Table 19: Results from Temporal Asp
- Page 65 and 66: Turning to the coefficient differen
- Page 67 and 68: Table 21: Frequency Crosstab <stron
- Page 69 and 70: 5.6.1. Dataset and Model Form Data
- Page 71 and 72: with the scenic vista. In other wor
- Page 73 and 74: 6. Repeat Sales Analysis In general
- Page 75 and 76: Table 27: List of
- Page 77 and 78: adjustment, and represent another t
- Page 79 and 80: that are located within one mile <s
- Page 81 and 82: 7. Sales Volume Analysis Th
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 11: Sales Volumes by PERIOD
- Page 85 and 86: three years before announcement), a
- Page 87 and 88: 8. Wind Pr
- Page 89 and 90: Drawing from the previous literatur
- Page 91 and 92: Taken together, the results from al
- Page 93 and 94: 9. Conclusions Though surveys gener
- Page 95 and 96: Davis, L. W. (2008) The</st
- Page 97 and 98: LeSage, J. P. (1999) The</s
- Page 99 and 100: Watson, M. (2005) Estimation <stron
- Page 101 and 102: Figure A - 1: Map of</stron
- Page 103 and 104: all very small communities with lit
- Page 105: A.2 TXHC Study Area: Howard County
- Page 109 and 110: Data Collection and Summary County
- Page 111 and 112: A.4 IABV Study Area: Buena Vista Co
- Page 113 and 114: Variables of Inter
- Page 115 and 116: facilities than the towns o
- Page 117 and 118: A.6 WIKCDC Study Area: Kewaunee and
- Page 119 and 120: Variables of Inter
- Page 121 and 122: elatively high elevations o
- Page 123 and 124: A.8 PAWC Study Area: Wayne County (
- Page 125 and 126: Census Statistics Name Type 2007 Po
- Page 127 and 128: ural landscapes, with the largest p
- Page 129 and 130: A.10 NYMC Study Area: Madison Count
- Page 131 and 132: Variables of Inter
- Page 133 and 134: account, combined with the determin
- Page 135 and 136: Appendix C: Field Data Collection I
- Page 137 and 138: Figure A - 14: Field Data Collectio
- Page 139 and 140: ABOVE AVERAGE VISTA PREMIUM VISTA 1
- Page 141 and 142: EXTREME VIEW 6 turbines visible fro
- Page 143 and 144: 5 is a vector of d
- Page 145 and 146: values, that effect seems likely to
- Page 147 and 148: unrestricted Home and Site Characte
- Page 149 and 150: with coefficients above zero and th
- Page 151 and 152: Figure A - 15: Histogram of
- Page 153 and 154: The M Distance his
- Page 155 and 156: sold within the preceding six month
Data Collecti<strong>on</strong> and Summary<br />
County <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficials Brett McKibben, Sally Munoz, and Sheri Proctor were extremely helpful in<br />
answering questi<strong>on</strong>s about the data required for this project, and the data were provided by two<br />
firms that manage it for the county. Specifically, Erin Welch <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Capital Appraisal Group<br />
provided the sales and house characteristic data and Paul Brandt <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> MIMS provided the GIS data.<br />
All valid single-family home sales transacti<strong>on</strong>s within five miles <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the nearest turbine and<br />
occurring between January 1996 and March 2007 were included in the dataset, resulting in 1,311<br />
sales. 106 <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se sales ranged in price from $10,492 to $490,000, with a mean <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $74,092.<br />
Because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the age <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the wind facility, many <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the sales in the sample occurred after wind<br />
facility c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> had commenced (n = 1,071). Of those, 104 had views <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the turbines, with<br />
27 having views more dramatic than MINOR. Four homes sold within a mile <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the facility,<br />
with the rest falling between <strong>on</strong>e and three miles (n = 584), three to five miles (n = 467), and<br />
outside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> five miles (n = 16).<br />
Area Statistics<br />
Study Period Study Period Number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Median Mean Minimum Maximum<br />
Begin End Sales Price Price Price Price<br />
1/2/1996 3/30/2007 1,311 $66,500 $74,092 $10,492 $490,000<br />
Facility Statistics<br />
Facility Name<br />
Number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
MW<br />
Number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Turbines<br />
Announce<br />
Date<br />
C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />
Begin Date<br />
Completi<strong>on</strong><br />
Date<br />
Turbine<br />
Maker<br />
Hub Height<br />
(Meters)<br />
Big Spring I 27.7 42 Jan-98 Jul-98 Jun-99 Vestas 65<br />
Big Spring II 6.6 4 Jan-98 Jul-98 Jun-99 Vestas 80<br />
Source: AWEA & Ventyx Inc.<br />
Variables <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Interest Statistics<br />
Development Period<br />
Pre<br />
Announcement<br />
Post Announcement<br />
Pre C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />
1st Year After<br />
C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />
2nd Year After<br />
C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />
2+ Years After<br />
C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />
Total<br />
Howard, TX (TXHC) 169 71 113 131 827 1311<br />
View <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Turbines<br />
Pre<br />
C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />
N<strong>on</strong>e Minor Moderate Substantial Extreme Total<br />
Howard, TX (TXHC) 240 967 77 22 5 0 1311<br />
Distance to<br />
Nearest Turbine<br />
Pre<br />
C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />
< 0.57 Miles 0.57 - 1 Miles 1 - 3 Miles 3 - 5 Miles > 5 Miles Total<br />
Howard, TX (TXHC) 240 0 4 584 467 16 1311<br />
106 If parcels intersected the five mile boundary, they were included in the sample, but were coded as being outside<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> five miles.<br />
88