The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Variables <strong>of</strong> Interest Statistics Development Period Pre Announcement Post Announcement Pre Construction 1st Year After Construction 2nd Year After Construction 2+ Years After Construction Total Benton/Walla Walla, WA & Umatilla, OR (WAOR) 226 45 76 59 384 790 View <strong>of</strong> Turbines Pre Construction None Minor Moderate Substantial Extreme Total Benton/Walla Walla, WA & Umatilla, OR (WAOR) Distance to Nearest Turbine Benton/Walla Walla, WA & Umatilla, OR (WAOR) 271 409 106 4 0 0 790 Pre Construction < 0.57 Miles 0.57 - 1 Miles 1 - 3 Miles 3 - 5 Miles > 5 Miles Total 271 0 0 20 277 222 790 Census Statistics Name Type 2007 Population % Change Since 2000 Population Per Mile^2 Median Age Median Income Median House 2007 % Change Since 2000 Kennewich, WA City 62,182 12.5% 2,711 32.3 $ 45,085 $ 155,531 46% Walla Walla, WA City 30,794 4.0% 2,847 33.8 $ 38,391 $ 185,706 91% Milton Freewater, OR Town 6,335 -2.0% 3,362 31.7 $ 30,229 $ 113,647 47% Touchet, WA Town 413 n/a 340 33.6 $ 47,268 $ 163,790 81% Benton County 159,414 3.6% 94 34.4 $ 51,464 $ 162,700 46% Walla Walla County 57,709 1.0% 45 34.9 $ 43,597 $ 206,631 89% Umatilla County 73,491 0.6% 23 34.6 $ 38,631 $ 138,200 47% Washington State 6,488,000 10.1% 89 35.3 $ 55,591 $ 300,800 79% Oregon State 3,747,455 9.5% 36 36.3 $ 48,730 $ 257,300 69% US Country 301,139,947 6.8% 86 37.9 $ 50,233 $ 243,742 46% Source: City-Data.com & Wikipedia. “% Change Since 2000” refers to the percentage change between 2000 and 2007 for the figures in the column to the left (population or median house price). “Town” signifies any municipality with less than 10,000 inhabitants. “n/a” signifies data not available. 86
A.2 TXHC Study Area: Howard County (Texas) Figure A - 3: Map <strong>of</strong> TXHC Study Area Note: “Sold Homes” include all sold homes both before and after construction. Area Description This study area is entirely contained within Howard County, Texas, and includes the city <strong>of</strong> Big Spring, which is situated roughly 100 miles South <strong>of</strong> Lubbock and 275 miles West <strong>of</strong> Dallas in West Texas. On top <strong>of</strong> the Northern end <strong>of</strong> the Edwards Plateau, which runs from the Southeast to the Northwest, sits the 46 turbine (34 MW) Big Spring wind facility, which was constructed in 1998 and 1999. Most <strong>of</strong> the wind turbines in this project have a hub height <strong>of</strong> 213 feet, but four are taller, at 262 feet. <strong>The</strong> plateau and the wind facility overlook the city <strong>of</strong> Big Spring which, when including its suburbs, wraps around the plateau to the South and East. Surrounding the town are modest farming tracks and arid, undeveloped land. <strong>The</strong>se lands, primarily to the South <strong>of</strong> the facility towards Forsan (not shown on map), are dotted with small oil rigs. Many <strong>of</strong> the homes in Big Spring do not have a view <strong>of</strong> the wind facility, but others to the South and East do have such views. 87
Page 1 and 2:
LBNL-2829E ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE
Page 3 and 4:
LBNL-2829E The <st
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents
Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables Tab
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements The</stron
Page 11 and 12:
This report builds on the previous
Page 13 and 14:
Table ES-2: Impact
Page 15 and 16:
Figure ES-3: Base Model Results: Sc
Page 17 and 18:
In the Distance Stability Model, fo
Page 19 and 20:
1. Introduction Wind</stron
Page 21 and 22:
model 7 and uses various forms <str
Page 23 and 24:
A particularly useful application <
Page 25 and 26:
Using different statistical methods
Page 27 and 28:
Table 1: Summary of</strong
Page 29 and 30:
By using a variety of</stro
Page 31 and 32:
minimum of 164 fee
Page 33 and 34:
3.2.2. GIS Data GIS data on parcel
Page 35 and 36:
In addition to the qualitative VIEW
Page 37 and 38:
with the rest of t
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 4: Frequency of</str
Page 41 and 42:
4. Base Hedonic Model This section
Page 43 and 44:
impose the least structure on the u
Page 45 and 46:
of the home, home
Page 47 and 48:
etween the reference study area (WA
Page 49 and 50:
Figure 7: Results from the Base Mod
Page 51 and 52:
5. Alternative Hedonic Models <stro
Page 53 and 54: concentrated inside of</str
Page 55 and 56: all other components are as defined
Page 57 and 58: the distance from them might not oc
Page 59 and 60: explanation is that the additional
Page 61 and 62: 6) More than four years after const
Page 63 and 64: Table 19: Results from Temporal Asp
Page 65 and 66: Turning to the coefficient differen
Page 67 and 68: Table 21: Frequency Crosstab <stron
Page 69 and 70: 5.6.1. Dataset and Model Form Data
Page 71 and 72: with the scenic vista. In other wor
Page 73 and 74: 6. Repeat Sales Analysis In general
Page 75 and 76: Table 27: List of
Page 77 and 78: adjustment, and represent another t
Page 79 and 80: that are located within one mile <s
Page 81 and 82: 7. Sales Volume Analysis Th
Page 83 and 84: Figure 11: Sales Volumes by PERIOD
Page 85 and 86: three years before announcement), a
Page 87 and 88: 8. Wind Pr
Page 89 and 90: Drawing from the previous literatur
Page 91 and 92: Taken together, the results from al
Page 93 and 94: 9. Conclusions Though surveys gener
Page 95 and 96: Davis, L. W. (2008) The</st
Page 97 and 98: LeSage, J. P. (1999) The</s
Page 99 and 100: Watson, M. (2005) Estimation <stron
Page 101 and 102: Figure A - 1: Map of</stron
Page 103: all very small communities with lit
Page 107 and 108: Census Statistics Name Type 2007 Po
Page 109 and 110: Data Collection and Summary County
Page 111 and 112: A.4 IABV Study Area: Buena Vista Co
Page 113 and 114: Variables of Inter
Page 115 and 116: facilities than the towns o
Page 117 and 118: A.6 WIKCDC Study Area: Kewaunee and
Page 121 and 122: elatively high elevations o
Page 123 and 124: A.8 PAWC Study Area: Wayne County (
Page 125 and 126: Census Statistics Name Type 2007 Po
Page 127 and 128: ural landscapes, with the largest p
Page 129 and 130: A.10 NYMC Study Area: Madison Count
Page 133 and 134: account, combined with the determin
Page 135 and 136: Appendix C: Field Data Collection I
Page 137 and 138: Figure A - 14: Field Data Collectio
Page 139 and 140: ABOVE AVERAGE VISTA PREMIUM VISTA 1
Page 141 and 142: EXTREME VIEW 6 turbines visible fro
Page 143 and 144: 5 is a vector of d
Page 145 and 146: values, that effect seems likely to
Page 147 and 148: unrestricted Home and Site Characte
Page 149 and 150: with coefficients above zero and th
Page 151 and 152: Figure A - 15: Histogram of
Page 153 and 154: The M Distance his
Page 155 and 156:
sold within the preceding six month
Page 157 and 158:
Appendix H: Alternative Models: Ful
Page 159 and 160:
Table A - 8: Full Results for the C
Page 161 and 162:
Table A - 10: Full Results for the
Page 163 and 164:
Table A - 11: Full Results for the
show all

The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?