06.05.2014 Views

GORDON KEENE VELLA. - On Point News

GORDON KEENE VELLA. - On Point News

GORDON KEENE VELLA. - On Point News

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

accurately it is akin to a land war. (See generally Barden Decl. 12-20 and authorities cited<br />

therein.)<br />

However, rather than simply admit the controversial nature of his theory, Dr. Brown<br />

persists in misrepresenting surveys and studies as supporting a conclusion of general acceptance<br />

when they do no such thing.<br />

For instance, Dr. Brown cites certain surveys and testifies that a combined figure of 89%<br />

of respondent members of the relevant scientific community either consider dissociative amnesia<br />

valid or possibly valid. (Tr. at 46:14 – 47:4.) There are two major errors with Dr. Brown’s<br />

conclusion. First, the surveys to which Dr. Brown cites involved mostly practicing clinicians<br />

including psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, counselors, and other types of therapists.<br />

However, practicing clinicians are not the “relevant scientific community” in this case. (Pope<br />

Decl. 36.) This is so because “such clinicians may or may not have sufficient training to be<br />

able to evaluate the merits of a theory such as ‘dissociative amnesia.’ Indeed, many types of<br />

practicing clinicians have had little formal scientific training, and very little ability to evaluate<br />

the methodology and conclusions of peer-reviewed scientific studies.” (Id.)<br />

Furthermore, even if clinicians are members of the relevant scientific community, Dr.<br />

Brown has misled this Court as to the meaning of these surveys. In particular, the inclusion of<br />

individuals responding “possibly valid” as being among those in general acceptance of the theory<br />

is without support. As Dr. Pope notes:<br />

The truth is that a response of “possibly valid” does not mean that a<br />

hypothesis is scientifically accepted. For example, many scientists would<br />

agree that there is “possibly” some form of life on Mars, at least on a<br />

bacterial level. A search for evidence of such life is currently underway.<br />

But the fact that many scientists think there is “possibly” life on Mars<br />

does not mean that it is generally accepted in the relevant scientific<br />

community that there is life on Mars.<br />

- 21 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!