Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Electrogenetherapy in cancer<br />
Franck Andre, Lluis M. Mir<br />
UMR 8121 CNRS - Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France<br />
Gene therapy basic principle is the introduction of nucleic acids into cells in order to<br />
obtain a therapeutic effect. Originally it was meant to correct hereditary monogenetic<br />
diseases but nowadays cancer diseases are the main indication, (67% of the clinical<br />
trials made between 1989 and 2006 [1]). The major limitation of gene therapy is the<br />
vector used for the transfer. Viruses, with their natural ability to infect the cells represent<br />
the most used approach in gene therapy (≈ 70% of current clinical protocols [1]). Due<br />
to adverse events in gene therapy clinical trials using adenovirus or retrovirus, there<br />
was a need for nonviral vectors. Electrogenetherapy is one of the most promising<br />
nonviral approaches.<br />
Electrogenetherapy, or DNA electrotransfer, is the in vivo application of the in vitro<br />
cell transfection approach initiated by Neumann in 1982. Electrogenetherapy includes:<br />
(i) the injection of a DNA or RNA sequence either locally or intravenously, (ii) the<br />
delivery of electric pulses to the targeted tissue, allowing the reversible permeabilisation<br />
of the targeted cells and the penetration of the nucleic acids into these permeabilised<br />
cells, (iii) gene expression or gene silencing.<br />
Although the main target of the therapy is the cancer cell, for electrogenetherapy in<br />
cancer there are two possible approaches: a) to transfect the tumor cells themselves,<br />
or b) to transfect muscle cells and to use the muscle as a factory to produce circulating<br />
molecules that will act on distant tissues (e.g. the tumor). Indeed, muscle is a tissue<br />
that can be very efficiently and reproducibly transfected, while transfection efficacy<br />
may vary from tumor to tumor.<br />
Whatever the transfected tissue, we have shown that the speed and volume of the<br />
injection<br />
48l31<br />
can affect nucleic acid distribution and transfer efficacy. We have shown<br />
that the electric pulses have two roles, a) to permeabilize the target cells and b) to<br />
electrophoretically push the nucleic acids towards the target cells [2]. The combinations<br />
of high voltage microsecond squared pulses (HV) with low voltage millisecond squared<br />
pulses (LV) allow to adjust the delivered pulses to the needs of the electrotransfer.<br />
Even though several kind of pulses have been used, we have found that very high<br />
efficacy and very reduced toxic effects (cellular stress or histological damages) are<br />
obtained using HV + LV combinations of pulses. The optimal parameters (amplitude,<br />
duration, number) of the HV and LV pulses depend on the target tissue.<br />
A wide range of type of nucleic acid have been electrotransfected to treat cancer:<br />
from plasmid DNA expressing local suicide gene in transfected tumor cells or plasmid<br />
coding for antiangiogienic secreted factor in muscular transfected cell, to siRNA<br />
silencing known oncogene in the tumor cells. The results obtained in these preclinical<br />
studies show that electrogenetherapy is a promising approach for cancer treatment.<br />
1. (http://82.182.180.141/trials/index.html)<br />
2. Satkauskas, S., et al., Electrophoretic Component of Electric Pulses Determines<br />
the Efficacy of In Vivo DNA Electrotransfer. Hum Gene Ther, 2005.