05.05.2014 Views

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 1. Ingredients of Powder Mixtures (Weight in grams)<br />

Ingredients Cellulose Binder Solvent<br />

Groups<br />

MCC<br />

MC<br />

CMC<br />

Gelatin Ethanol Water<br />

2%<br />

2%<br />

2%<br />

99%<br />

A 1 1 – – 2 2<br />

B 1 – 1 – 2 3,5<br />

C 2 5 1 – 4 5,5<br />

D 1 1 – 2 2 2<br />

E 1 – 1 2 2 5<br />

F 1 2 1 4 4 3<br />

Table 2. Results of Viscosity Test<br />

Group<br />

Drain time in Average ± Standard Deviation<br />

(seconds)<br />

A 20.8 ± 0.8<br />

B 20.2 ± 0.4<br />

C 23 ± 0.9<br />

D 19 ± 0.7<br />

E 19.6 ± 0.5<br />

F 23 ± 0.0<br />

at 25°C ± 2°C, equivalent to 40 to 60 cp at ideal<br />

viscosity for airbrush application. The results of<br />

the viscosity test are shown in Table 2. The drain<br />

time for all tested groups fell in the range of 19<br />

to 23 seconds, which indicates that all of the tested<br />

mixtures are suitable for spray application.<br />

Mixtures for Spray Test<br />

Different amounts of mixtures were designed<br />

for spraying at a distance of 15 to 20 cm. In this<br />

test, 1oz and 0.5oz of mixtures were sprayed onto<br />

a surface of Xuan paper in size of 5cm by 10cm.<br />

After spraying, roughness of six groups were measured<br />

by using Mitutoyo Surface Roughness SJ-<br />

301. The results of test showed that the roughness<br />

values of groups A and C were greater. Group F<br />

was shown to be the most consistent of all tested<br />

groups. In addition, the evenness of the mixture<br />

in Group F also appeared to be more controllable<br />

for spray application.<br />

<strong>Conservation</strong> Implementation<br />

The hand scroll, painted by Lin-can Lee, used for<br />

this study was seriously degraded by mold. The<br />

treatment process included surface cleaning,<br />

facing, backing removal, first layer of lining, second<br />

layer of lining, removing the facing paper,<br />

mapping the losses, applying masking to losses,<br />

filling losses with airbrush, in-painting and mounting.<br />

The method used to fill losses using an<br />

airbrush is as follows. Strips of Xuan paper were<br />

used to cover holes. Water was then applied on<br />

the Xuan paper according to the shape of the<br />

hole. Water tear was performed to shape areas to<br />

be compensated, shown on Figure 1. Based on the<br />

result of this experiment, the powder mixture F<br />

was chosen to be used as filling material in accordance<br />

with the airbrush technique. After filling,<br />

0.2% gelatin was also sprayed to provide further<br />

reinforcement. Before and after filling are shown<br />

in Figure 2.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The results showed that airbrushing can be an efficient<br />

way to fill losses of paper. A Chinese hand<br />

scroll was successfully restored in a follow-up<br />

conservation operation. In conclusion, this study<br />

offers an alternative method for filling losses in<br />

paper artifacts with special considerations.<br />

ICOM-CC Graphic Documents Working Group Interim Meeting | Vienna 17 – 19 April 2013<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!