Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Fig. 2: Coloured paper strips placed<br />
in the first half of the fore edge of the<br />
codex mark the original position of<br />
the head (yellow) and tail (green) of the<br />
animal on the skin. There are several<br />
reasons why the spines are distributed<br />
in this way through the quires. Parchment<br />
is more undulated and thicker in<br />
the area of the original neck, spine and<br />
rump than in other parts. With this<br />
layout one achieves a better balance in<br />
the thickness of the text block so that<br />
undesirable undulation of the folia is<br />
prevented. Spines of the skins of smaller<br />
sizes are placed centrally, while spines<br />
of larger skins are positioned either<br />
further up or down towards the top or<br />
bottom of the text block. With this arrangement<br />
a larger skin can also be used<br />
more economically, since leftovers which<br />
are cut away from one side of parchment<br />
may be used for the production of smaller<br />
manuscript documents.<br />
Fig. 3: One of the reassembled skins from<br />
the Prague Sacramentary, a manuscript<br />
of quarto size, shows that this skin was<br />
large enough to produce only 3 bifolia<br />
and not 4 as might be generally expected.<br />
This is not so surprising, since the sheepskin<br />
from which the parchment was<br />
made is quite thin and weak and could<br />
easily be mechanically damaged during<br />
the flaying of the skin. In addition, raw<br />
skin in the course of the parchment-making<br />
process may be affected by bacteria<br />
or mould, resulting in the appearance of<br />
a large number of small holes. Skin can<br />
become mechanically weak and quite<br />
large areas have to be removed already<br />
before the skin is stretched on the frame.<br />
Fig. 4: Traces of the parchment-maker’s<br />
knife can be visualised by making a rubbing<br />
over a textured surface placed over<br />
the parchment folio. This frottage method<br />
helps to isolate and record traces of<br />
a tool which left on the parchment a<br />
unique offprint made by its jagged edge.<br />
The obtained “fingerprint” or “bar code”<br />
can be later used for recognition of the<br />
identical tool on the surface of other<br />
parchment folia coming from the identical<br />
skin and later placed in a different<br />
part of the text block or even another<br />
codex. In the case of a smaller manuscript,<br />
for example of octavo size, we<br />
can expect a very uneven distribution of<br />
bifolia originating from one skin in the<br />
text block. For their production may also<br />
involve leftovers from the production of<br />
larger manuscripts.<br />
Jirí Vnoucek<br />
The Royal Library, Department of<br />
Preservation, Copenhagen, Denmark<br />
jiv@kb.dk<br />
ICOM-CC Graphic Documents Working Group Interim Meeting | Vienna 17 – 19 April 2013<br />
54