Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Fig 2. Partial least square prediction of DP of rag paper. RMSEP is root<br />
mean square error of prediction. It is defined as the root of the average<br />
of the squared differences between the predicted and measured values<br />
on the validation objects. R is the correlation coefficient, describing<br />
the strength of a linear dependence between two variables. N is the<br />
number of data points.<br />
(Zou 1996), giving rise to extensive use of viscometric<br />
determinations of degree of polymerisation<br />
(average number of monomer units in cellulose,<br />
DP) in characterisation of paper. Relative<br />
uncertainty is low, around 1% and a few tenths of<br />
mg of sample are needed. Although much lower<br />
than in the case of mechanical properties, this is<br />
an ample amount which prevents the use of the<br />
technique on historic materials. Alternatively,<br />
molar mass of cellulose may be determined using<br />
size exclusion chromatography, either using<br />
non derivatised cellulose (e.g. Henniges 2008) or<br />
derivatised (e.g. Lojewski 2010). A good correlation<br />
is observed between the viscometrically determined<br />
DP and the molar mass of carbanilated<br />
cellulose (Fig. 1).<br />
It had been shown that in the case when cellulose<br />
is derivatised using phenyl isocyanate, a few<br />
fibres suffice for characterisation (Stôl 2002). Despite<br />
the destructive nature of the method, the<br />
amount of the sample is small and the method<br />
results in no visible damage to the artefact. It<br />
also enables evaluation of different stabilisation<br />
processes on historical samples containing iron<br />
gall ink (Kolar 2012). However, the uncertainty<br />
related to the method is larger than in case of<br />
viscometry, often exceeding 5%. This is partly<br />
due to inhomogeneity of paper, the effect of<br />
which is more prominent in smaller samples.<br />
It is also an expensive method requiring highly<br />
skilled personnel.<br />
Near- and mid-FT-IR reflectance spectroscopy<br />
was used to model DP values obtained using<br />
viscometry (Trafela 2007). Quality of prediction<br />
is often described with a correlation coefficient<br />
R. The closer it is to +1 or -1, the more closely the<br />
two variables are related. A good correlation (R<br />
= 0.9658) between actual and predicted values<br />
were obtained using a scientific bench-top spectrometer<br />
Perkin-Elmer Spectrum GX (Waltham,<br />
MA) which collects spectra between 714 nm ~<br />
5,000 nm. The same instrument was used in<br />
another study, where mechanical properties<br />
such as tensile strength after folding (R = 0.8845)<br />
and tensile strength (R = 0.7607) were predicted<br />
(Lichtblau 2008). The instrument is not portable<br />
and the otherwise non-destructive spectrometric<br />
measurements are limited by the small size of<br />
the sample which can be used for otherwise nondestructive<br />
analysis. Based on the promising predictions<br />
a commercial software was developed by<br />
MORANA RTD, which enables determination of a<br />
range of properties of various papers, such as DP,<br />
Mw, pH, alkaline reserve using a reasonably affordable,<br />
portable spectrometer which allows for<br />
non-destructive data collection using an optical<br />
fibre. The software is, were possible, adapted to<br />
the requirements of the conservation community,<br />
which is often particularly interested in more<br />
degraded papers. Thus in addition to the prediction<br />
of DP of all rag papers, a separate prediction<br />
is made for more degraded papers, decreasing<br />
the error associated with the method (Fig. 2).<br />
2. pH<br />
Given the importance of pH on stability of paper,<br />
pH determination is likely the most often used<br />
analytical method in paper conservation studies.<br />
Standard method involves immersing 1 g<br />
of paper into 70 mL of distilled water and pH is<br />
determined after 1 hour (ISO 6588-1:2012). Since<br />
destructive sampling is required, researchers<br />
have minimized the sample requirements to 30-<br />
50 μg by using a micro electrode. Miniaturisation<br />
of the procedure decreases the repeatability with<br />
acceptable values of 1.0 pH unit (Strlic 2004),<br />
which was ascribed to the inhomogeneity of paper.<br />
In the alternative standard (TAPPI T 529 om-09)<br />
determination of the surface pH is made up to<br />
30 min after application of a water droplet to the<br />
surface of paper. Although non-destructive sam-<br />
ICOM-CC Graphic Documents Working Group Interim Meeting | Vienna 17 – 19 April 2013<br />
43