05.05.2014 Views

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fig 2. Partial least square prediction of DP of rag paper. RMSEP is root<br />

mean square error of prediction. It is defined as the root of the average<br />

of the squared differences between the predicted and measured values<br />

on the validation objects. R is the correlation coefficient, describing<br />

the strength of a linear dependence between two variables. N is the<br />

number of data points.<br />

(Zou 1996), giving rise to extensive use of viscometric<br />

determinations of degree of polymerisation<br />

(average number of monomer units in cellulose,<br />

DP) in characterisation of paper. Relative<br />

uncertainty is low, around 1% and a few tenths of<br />

mg of sample are needed. Although much lower<br />

than in the case of mechanical properties, this is<br />

an ample amount which prevents the use of the<br />

technique on historic materials. Alternatively,<br />

molar mass of cellulose may be determined using<br />

size exclusion chromatography, either using<br />

non derivatised cellulose (e.g. Henniges 2008) or<br />

derivatised (e.g. Lojewski 2010). A good correlation<br />

is observed between the viscometrically determined<br />

DP and the molar mass of carbanilated<br />

cellulose (Fig. 1).<br />

It had been shown that in the case when cellulose<br />

is derivatised using phenyl isocyanate, a few<br />

fibres suffice for characterisation (Stôl 2002). Despite<br />

the destructive nature of the method, the<br />

amount of the sample is small and the method<br />

results in no visible damage to the artefact. It<br />

also enables evaluation of different stabilisation<br />

processes on historical samples containing iron<br />

gall ink (Kolar 2012). However, the uncertainty<br />

related to the method is larger than in case of<br />

viscometry, often exceeding 5%. This is partly<br />

due to inhomogeneity of paper, the effect of<br />

which is more prominent in smaller samples.<br />

It is also an expensive method requiring highly<br />

skilled personnel.<br />

Near- and mid-FT-IR reflectance spectroscopy<br />

was used to model DP values obtained using<br />

viscometry (Trafela 2007). Quality of prediction<br />

is often described with a correlation coefficient<br />

R. The closer it is to +1 or -1, the more closely the<br />

two variables are related. A good correlation (R<br />

= 0.9658) between actual and predicted values<br />

were obtained using a scientific bench-top spectrometer<br />

Perkin-Elmer Spectrum GX (Waltham,<br />

MA) which collects spectra between 714 nm ~<br />

5,000 nm. The same instrument was used in<br />

another study, where mechanical properties<br />

such as tensile strength after folding (R = 0.8845)<br />

and tensile strength (R = 0.7607) were predicted<br />

(Lichtblau 2008). The instrument is not portable<br />

and the otherwise non-destructive spectrometric<br />

measurements are limited by the small size of<br />

the sample which can be used for otherwise nondestructive<br />

analysis. Based on the promising predictions<br />

a commercial software was developed by<br />

MORANA RTD, which enables determination of a<br />

range of properties of various papers, such as DP,<br />

Mw, pH, alkaline reserve using a reasonably affordable,<br />

portable spectrometer which allows for<br />

non-destructive data collection using an optical<br />

fibre. The software is, were possible, adapted to<br />

the requirements of the conservation community,<br />

which is often particularly interested in more<br />

degraded papers. Thus in addition to the prediction<br />

of DP of all rag papers, a separate prediction<br />

is made for more degraded papers, decreasing<br />

the error associated with the method (Fig. 2).<br />

2. pH<br />

Given the importance of pH on stability of paper,<br />

pH determination is likely the most often used<br />

analytical method in paper conservation studies.<br />

Standard method involves immersing 1 g<br />

of paper into 70 mL of distilled water and pH is<br />

determined after 1 hour (ISO 6588-1:2012). Since<br />

destructive sampling is required, researchers<br />

have minimized the sample requirements to 30-<br />

50 μg by using a micro electrode. Miniaturisation<br />

of the procedure decreases the repeatability with<br />

acceptable values of 1.0 pH unit (Strlic 2004),<br />

which was ascribed to the inhomogeneity of paper.<br />

In the alternative standard (TAPPI T 529 om-09)<br />

determination of the surface pH is made up to<br />

30 min after application of a water droplet to the<br />

surface of paper. Although non-destructive sam-<br />

ICOM-CC Graphic Documents Working Group Interim Meeting | Vienna 17 – 19 April 2013<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!