05.05.2014 Views

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Expected collection lifetime<br />

In the VALUE questionnaire, the respondents<br />

were additionally asked how long they would<br />

like the document they had been using (or viewing,<br />

in the context of an exhibition or of a historic<br />

library) to last in a usable state. The majority<br />

of responses focused on 50, 100, 200 and 500<br />

years, with 86% of respondents giving a response<br />

of ≤500 years (Fig. 1). Interestingly, there was only<br />

a small proportion of respondents of the opinion<br />

that the documents need to remain in a useable<br />

state indefinitely. The results corroborate previous<br />

findings focussing on museum and conservation<br />

professionals (Lindsay, 2005).<br />

Interestingly, a similar study was recently carried<br />

out on the expected lifetime of geological<br />

collections among professionals working with<br />

natural history collections (Robb, 2012). The<br />

results showed that 70% of the respondents expected<br />

the objects to last ≤500 years. The similar<br />

figure indicates that the actual material stability<br />

(geological collections being generally more<br />

chemically stable than paper collections) may<br />

not be reflected in the expected collection lifetime.<br />

It is of further interest what users thought<br />

could prevent documents from lasting this long.<br />

The results showed that readers, as well as visitor<br />

to exhibits and historic libraries, generally<br />

place most importance on handling as the source<br />

of degradation. Environmental conditions and<br />

storage were generally thought to be the second<br />

most important reason, followed by neglect.<br />

These views overlap with general conservation<br />

considerations well.<br />

Fig. 2: Examples of differently distressed documents used in fitness-forpurpose<br />

workshops, progressively discoloured and with a progressively<br />

big missing piece from left to right. The document on the left also has<br />

a large tear, stretching across text.<br />

about the document they viewed or read on<br />

the day of the visit. Following factor analysis,<br />

nine factors were extracted (56% of variance explained),<br />

which are summarised in Table 1. The<br />

factors are related to personal as well as wider<br />

significance of historic archives and libraries.<br />

Wear and tear<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> conservation research has so far mainly<br />

focussed on material change and environmental<br />

impacts. There is a solid body of research on<br />

chemical degradation of historic paper, leading<br />

to the loss of mechanical properties and discoloration,<br />

and objects that are potentially unfit<br />

for the purpose of reading or display. Properties<br />

that might negatively affect the fitness of objects<br />

are colour (a direct consequence of chemical<br />

degradation) and physical features that reduce<br />

the readability of such an object, such as tears<br />

and missing pieces, which may accumulate due<br />

to use. The process of accumulation of physical<br />

change is of significant interest to the Collections<br />

Demography model, as it links material<br />

properties and instances of use.<br />

The influence of some of the value factors on<br />

the decision when a document becomes unfit for<br />

use was explored in a series of user workshops,<br />

where users were requested to rank the fitness<br />

for purpose of differently distressed documents<br />

(discoloured, with tears or missing pieces). In<br />

this exercise, carried out at The National Archives<br />

(Kew), Library of Congress (Washington)<br />

and the Wellcome Library (London), 331 users<br />

participated. An example of three documents<br />

used in these workshops (out of 17 in total, with<br />

different combinations of distress) is shown in<br />

Fig. 2. It turned out that users are concerned<br />

with colour and tears only to a minor extent<br />

(irrespective of the purpose, i.e. display or reading),<br />

while they generally rank documents as<br />

‘unfit’ only once a piece of document is missing,<br />

containing text. It is important to stress that by<br />

unfit, we mean that some users will likely find<br />

the accumulated degradation unacceptable. This<br />

certainly does not mean that the document becomes<br />

unsuitable for use.<br />

Mechanical degradation (wear and tear) can<br />

only occur during handling of a document. So<br />

far, there has been no study looking into the<br />

rate of accumulation of aspects of mechanical<br />

distress during handling and a controlled experiment<br />

was designed involving handling of<br />

ICOM-CC Graphic Documents Working Group Interim Meeting | Vienna 17 – 19 April 2013<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!