Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Expected collection lifetime<br />
In the VALUE questionnaire, the respondents<br />
were additionally asked how long they would<br />
like the document they had been using (or viewing,<br />
in the context of an exhibition or of a historic<br />
library) to last in a usable state. The majority<br />
of responses focused on 50, 100, 200 and 500<br />
years, with 86% of respondents giving a response<br />
of ≤500 years (Fig. 1). Interestingly, there was only<br />
a small proportion of respondents of the opinion<br />
that the documents need to remain in a useable<br />
state indefinitely. The results corroborate previous<br />
findings focussing on museum and conservation<br />
professionals (Lindsay, 2005).<br />
Interestingly, a similar study was recently carried<br />
out on the expected lifetime of geological<br />
collections among professionals working with<br />
natural history collections (Robb, 2012). The<br />
results showed that 70% of the respondents expected<br />
the objects to last ≤500 years. The similar<br />
figure indicates that the actual material stability<br />
(geological collections being generally more<br />
chemically stable than paper collections) may<br />
not be reflected in the expected collection lifetime.<br />
It is of further interest what users thought<br />
could prevent documents from lasting this long.<br />
The results showed that readers, as well as visitor<br />
to exhibits and historic libraries, generally<br />
place most importance on handling as the source<br />
of degradation. Environmental conditions and<br />
storage were generally thought to be the second<br />
most important reason, followed by neglect.<br />
These views overlap with general conservation<br />
considerations well.<br />
Fig. 2: Examples of differently distressed documents used in fitness-forpurpose<br />
workshops, progressively discoloured and with a progressively<br />
big missing piece from left to right. The document on the left also has<br />
a large tear, stretching across text.<br />
about the document they viewed or read on<br />
the day of the visit. Following factor analysis,<br />
nine factors were extracted (56% of variance explained),<br />
which are summarised in Table 1. The<br />
factors are related to personal as well as wider<br />
significance of historic archives and libraries.<br />
Wear and tear<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> conservation research has so far mainly<br />
focussed on material change and environmental<br />
impacts. There is a solid body of research on<br />
chemical degradation of historic paper, leading<br />
to the loss of mechanical properties and discoloration,<br />
and objects that are potentially unfit<br />
for the purpose of reading or display. Properties<br />
that might negatively affect the fitness of objects<br />
are colour (a direct consequence of chemical<br />
degradation) and physical features that reduce<br />
the readability of such an object, such as tears<br />
and missing pieces, which may accumulate due<br />
to use. The process of accumulation of physical<br />
change is of significant interest to the Collections<br />
Demography model, as it links material<br />
properties and instances of use.<br />
The influence of some of the value factors on<br />
the decision when a document becomes unfit for<br />
use was explored in a series of user workshops,<br />
where users were requested to rank the fitness<br />
for purpose of differently distressed documents<br />
(discoloured, with tears or missing pieces). In<br />
this exercise, carried out at The National Archives<br />
(Kew), Library of Congress (Washington)<br />
and the Wellcome Library (London), 331 users<br />
participated. An example of three documents<br />
used in these workshops (out of 17 in total, with<br />
different combinations of distress) is shown in<br />
Fig. 2. It turned out that users are concerned<br />
with colour and tears only to a minor extent<br />
(irrespective of the purpose, i.e. display or reading),<br />
while they generally rank documents as<br />
‘unfit’ only once a piece of document is missing,<br />
containing text. It is important to stress that by<br />
unfit, we mean that some users will likely find<br />
the accumulated degradation unacceptable. This<br />
certainly does not mean that the document becomes<br />
unsuitable for use.<br />
Mechanical degradation (wear and tear) can<br />
only occur during handling of a document. So<br />
far, there has been no study looking into the<br />
rate of accumulation of aspects of mechanical<br />
distress during handling and a controlled experiment<br />
was designed involving handling of<br />
ICOM-CC Graphic Documents Working Group Interim Meeting | Vienna 17 – 19 April 2013<br />
39