Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Fig. 1: Poster ‚Do Broni‘ after reconstructive restoration 1994 Fig. 2: Poster ‚Do Broni‘ after the additions were removed the historical significance of the object, rather it only approached the artifact’s aesthetic value, impaired due to parts of its design missing. The conservators agreed that a “deconstruction” of this restoration would be necessary. There were also some structural questions with this restoration treatment. The poster became stiff and inflexible because of the illmatched thickness of backing paper used for lining it. Large losses were made disturbingly obtrusive by the in-fills which were made a few tones too light and mismatched color used for the reconstruction of the lettering. Deconstruction started with the removal of the backing paper. The artifact was humidified in a Gore-Tex and spun polyester ‘sandwich’ to allow for a slow introduction of moisture. The backing paper was carefully peeled off and the added repairs were removed with various spatulas and locally applied moisture. The adhesive was reduced mechanically. The poor condition of the original paper support was revealed and it showed that only three fourths of the paper support had survived (Fig. 2). The paper support was structurally weakened and stained by mold and other degradation factors. The artifact suffered extensive losses to both lower corners and along its sides. Several loose fragments had to be reconnected with the main section of the poster with small paper tabs to keep them in place. Most tears and abrasions within the ink layer ran through the center fold line and had signs of direct retouching. In some places the color matching was off significantly, especially in the red ink areas where pinkish over paint became evident. To remove the surface grime and dust, the front was gently dry-cleaned with eraser crumbs and a soft brush. The back was cleaned with small wads of cotton wool and deionized water to remove any residual adhesive. The object was then humidified gently and blotter washed. The large losses posed a problem; in-fills were prepared from Japanese paper of an appropriate weight but their color had to be toned down. The toning became a complicated trial and error exercise but with the help of ‘hellion textile dyes’ some even tones of warm beige and tan colors were obtained. Unfortunately several sheets of toned tissue were needed to fill all the losses, and not all of them turned the identical shade of tan. The poster was then lined with a large sheet of kozo paper and wheat starch paste adhesive mixed with some thin methyl cellulose to extend the working time. The lining process was ICOM-CC Graphic Documents Working Group Interim Meeting | Vienna 17 – 19 April 2013 114
Fig. 3: Poster after 2012 conservation treatment Fig. 4: Nazi broadside before treatment completed with the help of two large sheets of Mylar serving as transferring aides. The object was then placed for 30 minutes under moderate weights in a ‘sandwich’ of blotter paper, spun polyester and a sheet of woolen felt. The blotters were changed a few times. When the poster was dry and flat, pieces of toned paper shaped to fit the areas of loss were attached with wheat starch paste from the front. Small losses within the ink layer were retouched with dry pigments, pastel pencils and Winston Newton watercolors. The objective was to make the main area of the image visually cohesive but not to reconstruct the image or the lettering (Fig. 3). Retouching proved to be tricky in the areas where previous intervention had taken place but overall successfully unified the main image. The Nazi announcement broadside was printed in the 1940s in Krakow on a thin, pink machinemade paper (Fig. 4). This propaganda poster consists primarily of historical text and minimal visual elements. Therefore the goal of the treatment was to stabilize the object with minimal aesthetic intervention. Just as in the case of ‘Do Broni’, the condition of the object was poor. The paper support was dimensionally unstable, had numerous tears and losses along its main folds and had its upper right–hand corner completely missing. Although at first glance this treatment seemed similar to the treatment of ’Do Broni’, it proved to have its own challenges. The pink color of the broadside was unstable, so only blotter washing was possible. As in the previous treatment, lining was necessary to stabilise the very weak and brittle original support. First, all the folded areas were reinforced from the back with thin strips of Japanese paper and wheat starch paste. Some of these areas were very brittle and abraded. After a matching color was identified, an infill for the missing corner was created and attached from the back with wheat starch paste. As before, the lining process was aided by two large sheets of Mylar serving as transferring aides. Unfortunately the first lining procedure was unsuccessful. The paper chosen for the backing was too thick and the dimensionally unstable original support expanded too much during the treatment and as a result did not attach well to the backing paper. A combination of a few factors made the second lining successful: It was done with a thinner kozo paper. The original object was humidified for a shorter time. After the lining paper was adhered to the back of the original, the back was ‘massaged’ with bone folders over thin blotters in the folded areas. To further reduce the creases ICOM-CC Graphic Documents Working Group Interim Meeting | Vienna 17 – 19 April 2013 115
- Page 64 and 65: Fig. 4: Dyed endpaper pasted at the
- Page 66 and 67: Preservation of Architectural Drawi
- Page 68 and 69: Notes 1 According Salvador Muñoz V
- Page 70 and 71: course of time under the influence
- Page 72 and 73: the curators in review of the treat
- Page 74 and 75: cellulose powders with cellulose et
- Page 76 and 77: Authors Xing Kung Liao Conservator
- Page 78 and 79: Fig. 2: Our Railroad Workers and th
- Page 80 and 81: The Restoration of Cartoons at the
- Page 82 and 83: tation presumes that the works are
- Page 84 and 85: To Remove or Retain? - Extensive In
- Page 86 and 87: Fig. 4 repeated applications until
- Page 88 and 89: The Migration of Hydroxy Propyl Cel
- Page 90: tion issue allowed a visualisation
- Page 93 and 94: Ethical Considerations Concerning t
- Page 95 and 96: emoved with damp cotton swab. Then
- Page 97 and 98: Conservation of a Book of Hours fro
- Page 99 and 100: Fig. 4: Pigments movement and conse
- Page 101 and 102: Notes 1 Brazilwood lake, lapis lazu
- Page 103 and 104: pages, which would easily have torn
- Page 105 and 106: The Microflora Inhabiting Leonardo
- Page 107 and 108: Acknowledgments The authors would l
- Page 109 and 110: Microorganisms in Books - First Res
- Page 111 and 112: hyaline white mycelia on and in the
- Page 113: Deconstructing the Reconstruction E
- Page 117 and 118: Conservators’ Investigation of Ch
- Page 119 and 120: had been used, may be false-positiv
- Page 121 and 122: function will provide a holistic pi
- Page 123 and 124: Fig. 2: Patriarchs of Chan Buddhism
- Page 125 and 126: ing techniques, which build upon fu
- Page 127 and 128: Applications of Image Processing So
- Page 129 and 130: Fig. 3 Fig. 4 images in a single wi
- Page 131 and 132: Analysing Deterioration Artifacts i
- Page 133 and 134: Fig. 3 similarity maps. Similarity
- Page 135 and 136: Strategy in the Case of a Wrecked P
- Page 137 and 138: without preliminary consolidation.
- Page 139 and 140: Fiber Optic Reflectance Spectroscop
- Page 141 and 142: Fig. 3: 18 th century paper seal, i
- Page 143 and 144: Fig. 3 Fig. 4 of responsibilities r
- Page 145 and 146: Characterising the Origin of Carbon
- Page 147: Fig. 3: Sampling depth for ATR spec
- Page 150 and 151: Fig. 2: Filmoplast® tape attached
- Page 152 and 153: Pluchart, F. 1971. Pop Art Et Cie.
- Page 154 and 155: Fig. 3: The reverse of left screen
- Page 156: porting the reverse of severe creas
Fig. 1: Poster ‚Do Broni‘ after reconstructive<br />
restoration 1994<br />
Fig. 2: Poster ‚Do Broni‘ after the additions were removed<br />
the historical significance of the object, rather<br />
it only approached the artifact’s aesthetic value,<br />
impaired due to parts of its design missing. The<br />
conservators agreed that a “deconstruction” of<br />
this restoration would be necessary.<br />
There were also some structural questions<br />
with this restoration treatment. The poster<br />
became stiff and inflexible because of the illmatched<br />
thickness of backing paper used for<br />
lining it. Large losses were made disturbingly<br />
obtrusive by the in-fills which were made a few<br />
tones too light and mismatched color used for<br />
the reconstruction of the lettering.<br />
Deconstruction started with the removal of the<br />
backing paper. The artifact was humidified in a<br />
Gore-Tex and spun polyester ‘sandwich’ to allow<br />
for a slow introduction of moisture. The backing<br />
paper was carefully peeled off and the added repairs<br />
were removed with various spatulas and locally<br />
applied moisture. The adhesive was reduced<br />
mechanically.<br />
The poor condition of the original paper support<br />
was revealed and it showed that only three<br />
fourths of the paper support had survived (Fig.<br />
2). The paper support was structurally weakened<br />
and stained by mold and other degradation factors.<br />
The artifact suffered extensive losses to<br />
both lower corners and along its sides. Several<br />
loose fragments had to be reconnected with the<br />
main section of the poster with small paper tabs<br />
to keep them in place. Most tears and abrasions<br />
within the ink layer ran through the center fold<br />
line and had signs of direct retouching. In some<br />
places the color matching was off significantly,<br />
especially in the red ink areas where pinkish<br />
over paint became evident.<br />
To remove the surface grime and dust, the<br />
front was gently dry-cleaned with eraser crumbs<br />
and a soft brush. The back was cleaned with<br />
small wads of cotton wool and deionized water<br />
to remove any residual adhesive. The object was<br />
then humidified gently and blotter washed.<br />
The large losses posed a problem; in-fills were<br />
prepared from Japanese paper of an appropriate<br />
weight but their color had to be toned down. The<br />
toning became a complicated trial and error exercise<br />
but with the help of ‘hellion textile dyes’<br />
some even tones of warm beige and tan colors<br />
were obtained. Unfortunately several sheets of<br />
toned tissue were needed to fill all the losses, and<br />
not all of them turned the identical shade of tan.<br />
The poster was then lined with a large sheet<br />
of kozo paper and wheat starch paste adhesive<br />
mixed with some thin methyl cellulose to extend<br />
the working time. The lining process was<br />
ICOM-CC Graphic Documents Working Group Interim Meeting | Vienna 17 – 19 April 2013<br />
114