Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
current electronic physical formats such of CDs<br />
and DVDs. 21 More reliable media are needed. One<br />
candidate is DNA, which has myriad advantages<br />
as an encoding system, from a preservation and<br />
information management perspective. 22<br />
3 Maximization of Minimal Resources<br />
through Partnerships<br />
Partnerships, like the aforementioned examples<br />
with IPI, NIST and LBNL, promote preservation<br />
possibilities, especially when supported by public<br />
and private funders and associations such as AIC,<br />
ICON, ICOM, ICCROM and IFLA. Examples of powerful<br />
partnerships that will advance preservation<br />
of collections include the following:<br />
• Digital Preservation Groups, such as that at<br />
the Library of Congress, which promotes preservation<br />
of digital formats most at risk, by developing<br />
guidelines based on best practices of<br />
life cycle management.<br />
• National Endowment for the Humanities/<br />
National Digital Newspaper Program, which<br />
provides a model for preservation of at-risk<br />
collections by its initiative to preserve newspapers<br />
through digitization from microfilm. 23<br />
• Council on Library and Information Resources’<br />
Digital Humanities Fellowship, which advances<br />
scientific studies of primary source materials.<br />
24<br />
• Andrew W. Mellon Foundation’s Grant for<br />
Library and Archives <strong>Conservation</strong> Training,<br />
which aims to advance graduate training<br />
through partnerships among institutions such<br />
as the Library of Congress. 25<br />
• Heritage Science Programs, such as that at the<br />
University College of London (UCL), to advance<br />
the new discipline of heritage science within<br />
university STEM (science, technology, engineering<br />
and math) curricula, as supported by<br />
national science agencies. 26<br />
New roles for conservators<br />
Conservators have long recognized the importance<br />
of materials science in assuring the longterm<br />
efficacy of our efforts. We now have new<br />
opportunities to exploit advances in computer<br />
science, particularly in the fields of imaging and<br />
data analysis, facilitating the emerging discipline<br />
of digital humanities. Partnerships with<br />
our computer savvy counterparts can ultimately<br />
lead to innovations that, for instance, enhance<br />
conservation treatment training through computer<br />
simulation incorporating haptic biofeedback<br />
technology, similar to that used to train<br />
medical surgeons. 27 This, particularly if coupled<br />
with the development of expert systems for decision-making,<br />
can extend our skills and judgement.<br />
We need to continue to promote surveys to document<br />
and prioritize collection needs, incorporating<br />
new endeavors that leverage economies of<br />
scale, such as UCL’s collection demography survey,<br />
or, in the US, the upcoming second Heritage<br />
Health Index Survey planned by Heritage Preservation<br />
to capture changes in stewardship, awareness<br />
and needs during the last decade.<br />
Finally, we must educate ourselves to recognize<br />
the pressing needs not only of our traditional<br />
collections, but also of the most vulnerable media<br />
in our audiovisual and digital collections,<br />
which are the legacy of our own era.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The trends described in this paper, which are<br />
becoming more prevalent in major institutions<br />
tasked to preserve our collective cultural heritage,<br />
aim to maximize today’s minimal resources<br />
through expanding preservation capabilities and<br />
partnerships. Despite economic limitations, we<br />
are all compelled to recognize our responsibilities<br />
to sustain and conserve our cultural resources,<br />
just as we do our natural resources, though<br />
development of information and educational<br />
outreach initiatives. 28<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
Special thanks go to the organizers of<br />
this Interim ICOM-CC Conference, as<br />
well as to Mark Sweeney, the current<br />
Director for Preservation at the Library<br />
of Congress, and to Fenella France, Chief<br />
of Preservation Research and Testing.<br />
Thanks go also to the current leadership<br />
of the Library of Congress, Robert<br />
Dizard, Chief of Staff, and to Roberta<br />
Shaffer, Associate Librarian for Library<br />
Services (ALLS). Additional thanks go<br />
to the Librarian of Congress, James Billington,<br />
and the former ALLS, Deanna<br />
Marcum. Final thanks go to other Library<br />
of Congress points of contact on the innovations<br />
highlighted in this presentation,<br />
including (but not limited to) the<br />
following: Diane Vogt-O’Connor, Nancy<br />
Lev-Alexander, Jeanne Drewes, Adrija<br />
Henley, Elmer Eusman, Peter Alyea, Lynn<br />
Brostoff, Michele Youket, Eric Breitung,<br />
ICOM-CC Graphic Documents Working Group Interim Meeting | Vienna 17 – 19 April 2013<br />
11