05.05.2014 Views

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

current electronic physical formats such of CDs<br />

and DVDs. 21 More reliable media are needed. One<br />

candidate is DNA, which has myriad advantages<br />

as an encoding system, from a preservation and<br />

information management perspective. 22<br />

3 Maximization of Minimal Resources<br />

through Partnerships<br />

Partnerships, like the aforementioned examples<br />

with IPI, NIST and LBNL, promote preservation<br />

possibilities, especially when supported by public<br />

and private funders and associations such as AIC,<br />

ICON, ICOM, ICCROM and IFLA. Examples of powerful<br />

partnerships that will advance preservation<br />

of collections include the following:<br />

• Digital Preservation Groups, such as that at<br />

the Library of Congress, which promotes preservation<br />

of digital formats most at risk, by developing<br />

guidelines based on best practices of<br />

life cycle management.<br />

• National Endowment for the Humanities/<br />

National Digital Newspaper Program, which<br />

provides a model for preservation of at-risk<br />

collections by its initiative to preserve newspapers<br />

through digitization from microfilm. 23<br />

• Council on Library and Information Resources’<br />

Digital Humanities Fellowship, which advances<br />

scientific studies of primary source materials.<br />

24<br />

• Andrew W. Mellon Foundation’s Grant for<br />

Library and Archives <strong>Conservation</strong> Training,<br />

which aims to advance graduate training<br />

through partnerships among institutions such<br />

as the Library of Congress. 25<br />

• Heritage Science Programs, such as that at the<br />

University College of London (UCL), to advance<br />

the new discipline of heritage science within<br />

university STEM (science, technology, engineering<br />

and math) curricula, as supported by<br />

national science agencies. 26<br />

New roles for conservators<br />

Conservators have long recognized the importance<br />

of materials science in assuring the longterm<br />

efficacy of our efforts. We now have new<br />

opportunities to exploit advances in computer<br />

science, particularly in the fields of imaging and<br />

data analysis, facilitating the emerging discipline<br />

of digital humanities. Partnerships with<br />

our computer savvy counterparts can ultimately<br />

lead to innovations that, for instance, enhance<br />

conservation treatment training through computer<br />

simulation incorporating haptic biofeedback<br />

technology, similar to that used to train<br />

medical surgeons. 27 This, particularly if coupled<br />

with the development of expert systems for decision-making,<br />

can extend our skills and judgement.<br />

We need to continue to promote surveys to document<br />

and prioritize collection needs, incorporating<br />

new endeavors that leverage economies of<br />

scale, such as UCL’s collection demography survey,<br />

or, in the US, the upcoming second Heritage<br />

Health Index Survey planned by Heritage Preservation<br />

to capture changes in stewardship, awareness<br />

and needs during the last decade.<br />

Finally, we must educate ourselves to recognize<br />

the pressing needs not only of our traditional<br />

collections, but also of the most vulnerable media<br />

in our audiovisual and digital collections,<br />

which are the legacy of our own era.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The trends described in this paper, which are<br />

becoming more prevalent in major institutions<br />

tasked to preserve our collective cultural heritage,<br />

aim to maximize today’s minimal resources<br />

through expanding preservation capabilities and<br />

partnerships. Despite economic limitations, we<br />

are all compelled to recognize our responsibilities<br />

to sustain and conserve our cultural resources,<br />

just as we do our natural resources, though<br />

development of information and educational<br />

outreach initiatives. 28<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Special thanks go to the organizers of<br />

this Interim ICOM-CC Conference, as<br />

well as to Mark Sweeney, the current<br />

Director for Preservation at the Library<br />

of Congress, and to Fenella France, Chief<br />

of Preservation Research and Testing.<br />

Thanks go also to the current leadership<br />

of the Library of Congress, Robert<br />

Dizard, Chief of Staff, and to Roberta<br />

Shaffer, Associate Librarian for Library<br />

Services (ALLS). Additional thanks go<br />

to the Librarian of Congress, James Billington,<br />

and the former ALLS, Deanna<br />

Marcum. Final thanks go to other Library<br />

of Congress points of contact on the innovations<br />

highlighted in this presentation,<br />

including (but not limited to) the<br />

following: Diane Vogt-O’Connor, Nancy<br />

Lev-Alexander, Jeanne Drewes, Adrija<br />

Henley, Elmer Eusman, Peter Alyea, Lynn<br />

Brostoff, Michele Youket, Eric Breitung,<br />

ICOM-CC Graphic Documents Working Group Interim Meeting | Vienna 17 – 19 April 2013<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!